Cal's Post-Season Hopes

8,619 Views | 115 Replies | Last: 25 days ago by stu
01Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realistically, the only way Cal gets invited to the Dance is if Cal somehow goes on a run and wins the ACC Championship (or at the very least loses a close championship game in OT).

So that means Cal's likely to be NIT-bound. Before the season, I had hoped that Cal would do well enough just to make the NIT. Now it looks like Cal might not just make the NIT but be a fairly low seed. That's better than I had hoped.

While I am disappointed that Cal (likely) won't participate in March Madness this year, I'm still impressed with Madsen's progress. Hopefully, he'll build on this and get Cal an invite next year.

Go Bears!
Onebearofpower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
01Bear said:

Realistically, the only way Cal gets invited to the Dance is if Cal somehow goes on a run and wins the ACC Championship (or at the very least loses a close championship game in OT).

So that means Cal's likely to be NIT-bound. Before the season, I had hoped that Cal would do well enough just to make the NIT. Now it looks like Cal might not just make the NIT but be a fairly low seed. That's better than I had hoped.

While I am disappointed that Cal (likely) won't participate in March Madness this year, I'm still impressed with Madsen's progress. Hopefully, he'll build on this and get Cal an invite next year.

Go Bears!

No we don't what the hell are you talking about. If we beat Duke we will be in for sure.
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Onebearofpower said:

01Bear said:

Realistically, the only way Cal gets invited to the Dance is if Cal somehow goes on a run and wins the ACC Championship (or at the very least loses a close championship game in OT).

So that means Cal's likely to be NIT-bound. Before the season, I had hoped that Cal would do well enough just to make the NIT. Now it looks like Cal might not just make the NIT but be a fairly low seed. That's better than I had hoped.

While I am disappointed that Cal (likely) won't participate in March Madness this year, I'm still impressed with Madsen's progress. Hopefully, he'll build on this and get Cal an invite next year.

Go Bears!

No we don't what the hell are you talking about. If we beat Duke we will be in for sure.


Absolutely no chance we beat Duke. Hell, I wouldn't even bet that we beat Florida State.
vaderbear95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal does NOT need to win the ACC championship. Pretty sure we need to win that first game. Wish the second game wasn't Duke. No doubt a win against Duke gets us in, but it's possible to get in short of that. A lot of the bubble has lost today. And we still have high quality Q1 wins of both amount and quality at least as good or better than a lot of the bubble teams. This wasn't a "bad" loss though it certainly feels horrible, especially since the refs played a significant part in it, especially in the first half. It was a Q1 loss. Obviously it hurts our hopes but a lot of other teams had losses today, and worse than ours.
Onebearofpower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golden One said:

Onebearofpower said:

01Bear said:

Realistically, the only way Cal gets invited to the Dance is if Cal somehow goes on a run and wins the ACC Championship (or at the very least loses a close championship game in OT).

So that means Cal's likely to be NIT-bound. Before the season, I had hoped that Cal would do well enough just to make the NIT. Now it looks like Cal might not just make the NIT but be a fairly low seed. That's better than I had hoped.

While I am disappointed that Cal (likely) won't participate in March Madness this year, I'm still impressed with Madsen's progress. Hopefully, he'll build on this and get Cal an invite next year.

Go Bears!

No we don't what the hell are you talking about. If we beat Duke we will be in for sure.


Absolutely no chance we beat Duke. Hell, I wouldn't even bet that we beat Florida State.

This is why we play the games. For the good and for the bad.
Calfan92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Book your NIT trips to Berkeley. Packing the Haas with 2,500 to watch Cal take on Vermont. This team's NCAA hopes are cooked.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vaderbear95 said:

Cal does NOT need to win the ACC championship. Pretty sure we need to win that first game. Wish the second game wasn't Duke. No doubt a win against Duke gets us in, but it's possible to get in short of that. A lot of the bubble has lost today. And we still have high quality Q1 wins of both amount and quality at least as good or better than a lot of the bubble teams. This wasn't a "bad" loss though it certainly feels horrible, especially since the refs played a significant part in it, especially in the first half. It was a Q1 loss. Obviously it hurts our hopes but a lot of other teams had losses today, and worse than ours.

Currently 20 wins, .500 in conference. Well in the 60s in NET. Getting to 21 wins and still .500 in conference is not going to be enough. It would only improve our NIT seed, which right now would not be great. We need to make a run at the ACC Tournament to have a chance. And I honestly think we are capable, not like we have been playing lately, but when we play our best.
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Honestly, even if we were to beat FSU and by some miracle Duke, we are still not in. Really.
Johnfox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Two of these teams have to be in right now

SMU (lost)
Virginia Tech (lost)
Cal (lost)
Auburn (play later)
Stanford (won, were way out)
Indiana (losing)
New Mexico (lost)
USC (play later)

Maybe still throw a bone to a few others like OKST, Cincy & SDSU further out. USF sleeper

Per T3 Bracketology
Onebearofpower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RedlessWardrobe said:

Honestly, even if we were to beat FSU and by some miracle Duke, we are still not in. Really.

Please explain how we wouldn't be in by beating the number 1 team in the nation when every bubble team lost today.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnfox said:

Two of these teams have to be in right now

SMU (lost)
Virginia Tech (lost)
Cal (lost)
Auburn (play later)
Stanford (won, were way out)
Indiana (losing)
New Mexico (lost)
USC (play later)

Maybe still throw a bone to a few others like OKST, Cincy & SDSU further out. USF sleeper

Per T3 Bracketology

Assuming no Cinderellas win conference tournament autobids.

That is why I think we need to have a statement win in the ACC Tournament to distinguish ourselves. Our Quad 1 wins are our best calling card but we need one to be fresh and in the minds of the Committee. We are a .500 conference team and do not have a "strong finish" otherwise.
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Onebearofpower said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

Honestly, even if we were to beat FSU and by some miracle Duke, we are still not in. Really.

Please explain how we wouldn't be in by beating the number 1 team in the nation when every bubble team lost today.

Because the committee goes by the entire season. They don't look at one day, or one win. Our overall power ranking is too low. How many of those other bubble teams lost to a team like Pitt? Highly unlikely.

If we were to win 3 straight in the ACC, and then play a competitive championship game we'd probably make it.
Anything short of that forget it. (Of course I would be more than happy to eat my words.)
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Onebearofpower said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

Honestly, even if we were to beat FSU and by some miracle Duke, we are still not in. Really.

Please explain how we wouldn't be in by beating the number 1 team in the nation when every bubble team lost today.

Depends how the Committee looks at it. Top teams have been known to tank in conference tournaments in order to be rested for the NCAAs. That could be the narrative if we win. But beat Duke, and the next team to make it to the ACC Championship game and we are in, win or lose.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Onebearofpower said:




If we beat Duke we will be in for sure.


If we beat Duke the Alien Invasion is underway and there won't be an NCCA Tournament!


Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Onebearofpower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RedlessWardrobe said:

Onebearofpower said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

Honestly, even if we were to beat FSU and by some miracle Duke, we are still not in. Really.

Please explain how we wouldn't be in by beating the number 1 team in the nation when every bubble team lost today.

Because the committee goes by the entire season. They don't look at one day, or one win. Our overall power ranking is too low. How many of those other bubble teams lost to a team like Pitt? Highly unlikely.

If we were to win 3 straight in the ACC, and then play a competitive championship game we'd probably make it.
Anything short of that forget it. (Of course I would be more than happy to eat my words.)

I'm sorry but you are just dead wrong. And it seems like you just don't know the resumes of these teams or something or the fact that you can't get passed when you lose a Q1 on the road by 7 and literally every bubble team also some badly.

I'll give you the bubble and their losses:

Ohio State(hardly bubble) also lost to Pitt.
NC State has lost 6 of their last 7 and lost a Quad 4 to Georgia Tech.
18-13 Indiana has lost 5 of their last 6 and they lost to Northwestern at home.
19-12 SMU who we have a head to head win against, has lost their last four games, no horrible losses but they did lose to LSU(worst team in the SEC) at a neutral site.
18-12 Texas has lost 3 of their last 4 and plays another non tourney team today, they lost to Miss State at home.
16-14 Auburn has lost 7 of their last nine and lost to both Ole Miss and Miss State. They also play Alabama tonight so they are in not unlikely shape to end with 15 regular season losses.
24-7 SCU has lost to #304 Loyola Chicago and they haven't beaten a soul other than Saint Mary's.
21-10 TCU(Likely in and off the bubble) has lost to #212 New Orleans at home and Notre Dame at home.
21-9 New Mexico has lost to both #189 New Mexico State and #82 CSU at home. They have also lost three of their last 4.
20-10 SDSU has lost to #141 Troy and has also lost 4 of their last six games.
20-10 UCF has lost their last 3 games all to projected non tournament teams and one of which was Q3 to Oklahoma State.
20-10 Missouri(I would guess is prob in) Has lost their last two and lost to Notre Dame, Ole Miss, and LSU.
18-13 WVU has lost 4 of their last 6 and has lost to #127 Utah, Xavier, and multiple other non tourney teams.
20-10 Ugh Stanford has lost to #111 UNLV, #119 Seattle, and Notre Dame all at home.
24-7 VCU lost to #96 George Mason and has not beaten a single projected at large team and their quad 1s(2) are hanging on to the boundary at 49(50) and 75(75).
18-13 Okla ST no real bad bad losses but also only two Q1s and losses to many non tournament teams(plus OKSU is off the bubble by a little bit).
19-12 VTU lost by 23 to FSU at home formerly Q3, they don't have any real bad losses but they also only have two Q1s.
20-10 Texas A&M is prob in and doesn't have any bad losses
17-14 Cinncinati lost to #240 Eastern Michigan and Xavier
20-11 Seton Hall has two Q3 losses and lost to Depaul TWICE and Creighton and Butler.
18-12 USC has lost to UW twice, Northwestern, Oregon, and oh they have lost 6 straight and are likely to lose again. They also lost their best player.
SLU just lost by 30 today who knows where they are in all of this.
The Net isn't a science and this is a very weird year. We are below #60 BSU who is 20-13 and lost to Hawaii Pacific to start the year and also lost to #111 UNLV twice this year.


I think frankly you just gotta research these teams because it isn't as clear cut as "they have a higher NET", it is about the resume it always has been. And if everyone else didn't lose today we would be in a lot worse of a situation but they did so we can't fall very far when literally every team lost and our loss isn't bad especially as it is Q1 and only by 7. Many teams lost at home against worse competition.

I also think the Bid Stealing is getting blown out of proportion. If you think that KSU is going to win the Big 12 then that is fine but it is so so unlikely. The only real bid stealer threats are Saint Joseph's, Dayton, George Mason in the A10. Colorado State, Nevada, prob BSU, and GCU in the MW. And Akron in the MAC. Nobody else is even close to a serious threat and even those are pretty unlikely to occur.

Teams like UMN and SDSU are not bid stealers because we aren't losing an at large spot for them as they would be in if they made their Conf. Tourney games. Same goes for VCU and Seton Hall. Wouldn't be good for us but that doesn't take away a bid from the whole bubble it is just a bubble team improving their resume.

We have 4Q1 Wins and you can't take that away from us. And they are against legit teams also not freaking Northwestern who has wayyyy too high a Net for their performance, they have been against good tournament teams and then our biggest rival who has also beat many good teams(They just have way more Q3 losses). Many of these teams have half of that or less and still have a bad loss or two. If they lose in their Tourneys they are also in big trouble.

I think anyone that is saying we need to make the championship game in the ACC or doesn't think we are in for sure if we beat Duke, isn't fully understanding the bubble situations and how likely a bid stealer actually is. If you're gonna talk about predictives then I'm not sure why we are even playing the games then. The predictives have been wrong for like half our games and many many others because they can't account for so many intangibles and they don't actually value winning the game.

Today was a horribly sad loss that was partially on the players in the second half, but also on the officials for screwing us over time and time again and letting Wake stay in the game and giving them momentum. But let's not let it cloud our vision on what the bubble actually looks like and what teams are doing around us. Let's take it one day at time and beat FSU. If we do that I guarantee we won't know for sure that our season and dancing hopes are dead.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I applaud you on the effort you put into that post
Onebearofpower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks hopefully it gives people a better perspective on the bubble as a whole and not just our little bubble of shame as most bubble teams have a bubble of shame right now.
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Onebearofpower said:

01Bear said:

Realistically, the only way Cal gets invited to the Dance is if Cal somehow goes on a run and wins the ACC Championship (or at the very least loses a close championship game in OT).

So that means Cal's likely to be NIT-bound. Before the season, I had hoped that Cal would do well enough just to make the NIT. Now it looks like Cal might not just make the NIT but be a fairly low seed. That's better than I had hoped.

While I am disappointed that Cal (likely) won't participate in March Madness this year, I'm still impressed with Madsen's progress. Hopefully, he'll build on this and get Cal an invite next year.

Go Bears!

No we don't what the hell are you talking about. If we beat Duke we will be in for sure.

You are absolutely dreaming.
Onebearofpower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OdontoBear66 said:

Onebearofpower said:

01Bear said:

Realistically, the only way Cal gets invited to the Dance is if Cal somehow goes on a run and wins the ACC Championship (or at the very least loses a close championship game in OT).

So that means Cal's likely to be NIT-bound. Before the season, I had hoped that Cal would do well enough just to make the NIT. Now it looks like Cal might not just make the NIT but be a fairly low seed. That's better than I had hoped.

While I am disappointed that Cal (likely) won't participate in March Madness this year, I'm still impressed with Madsen's progress. Hopefully, he'll build on this and get Cal an invite next year.

Go Bears!

No we don't what the hell are you talking about. If we beat Duke we will be in for sure.

You are absolutely dreaming.

Please tell me what teams are in over us on the bubble, including the likely Auburn loss in the making. And you can give their resume best wins and worst losses. Because I don't see a world unless it is the very unlikely world of 4 bid stealers or something or every other bubble team going on a crazy run, that an already bubble team like Cal wins 23 games and beats the Number one team in the nation and isn't in. Name me another bubble team you would say isn't in if they beat Duke in their conference tournament after beating Florida State.
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Onebearofpower said:

Thanks hopefully it gives people a better perspective on the bubble as a whole and not just our little bubble of shame as most bubble teams have a bubble of shame right now.

I as well, appreciate the extensive amount of your research on the bubble teams. So let me ask you,(and I won't hold you to it strongly), as of right now what percentage would you think we have of making the dance?
vaderbear95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well researched post. Seems like it shouldn't have to be said, but it matters hugely what other bubble teams are doing and how their resumes actually stack up against ours, regardless of the Net rankings. All of the computer stuff heavily weighs efficiency and the like, but projections are projections, and game results are a different thing. Our resume of actual wins and losses stands up pretty favorably to a lot of our bubble competitors when you look at quality of wins and lack of many bad losses.
Not saying we're in, but we're definitely not out yet. C'mon bears, let's finish the pre-national tournament season strong.
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What are people smoking on this thread? No Duke win, no Madness, plan for the NIT Final Four.
Onebearofpower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RedlessWardrobe said:

Onebearofpower said:

Thanks hopefully it gives people a better perspective on the bubble as a whole and not just our little bubble of shame as most bubble teams have a bubble of shame right now.

I as well, appreciate the extensive amount of your research on the bubble teams. So let me ask you,(and I won't hold you to it strongly), as of right now what percentage would you think we have of making the dance?

To preface I wanna say that we entered the day in the range of last 2 in to first of next four out(that's nonsense Lunardi is awful) and I think Indiana, likely Auburn, New Mexico, SMU, VT, and NC State all took losses worse than ours given what they needed and what it does to them(lack of Q1 wins, 16 losses for Auburn if they are AL eligible, etc.)
Probably whatever the odds of us winning the FSU game (let's just say 50 percent prob somewhere around there since we lost by about 6 inches last time with no Dort) plus enough bubble teams losing who are possibly above us(prob a bit intricate but generally would be the probability a team like VCU or anyone losing in the first round of A10 + the prob they win but then lose the next game horribly).

Teams I think are in this would be like UCF, VCU, SMU, NC State, Missou(disregard the losing bad in the second game for them and prob UCF), SLU, Texas

Then there are the teams that we are around the same level on or above. I think if we beat FSU and these teams also only win 1 or 0 games we are ahead of them: Auburn, VT, UNM, Indiana, USC, Seton Hall, Stanford, Cinncinati, Oklahoma, SCU, SDSU, and then any of the other teams that need a miracle/2 or more wins.


And then there is the not super likely scenario that we lose and basically every one of these teams loses which isn't too likely but it literally happened today so it isn't at all out of the question. Then we have a chance based on what the committee decides.

Keep in mind it is all relative to each year, the fact that you(not you personally) don't think a 21-23 win Cal team can't make it doesn't change that they have to select 68 teams and if everyone keeps losing nobody is getting anywhere.

Also with regards to the teams losing I mentioned not all of them have to lose in the beat FSU scenario only enough so that we make the tourney. I think there are about 29-30 locks for at large spots at the moment. So we would need, however many spots we need(which is the obvious big unknown of where we fall in the bubble) to catch up, that many teams to lose - the prob of a bid stealer (which peters out the more you think as it is more and more unlikely for say 4) and that many teams losing.

Then you have to account for the prob 1-2 percent chance we beat Duke. If we do that I think there is at least a 95 percent chance we are in because it would, again, take 8-9 teams also winning 2 or 3 games because of Duke's quality to keep us below the cut line.

Overall I would say probably around 20-30 percent given the way the bubble has played the last two to three weeks. I know it is kinda hard to see the light given that all our games are on ESPN and their bracketologist is the biggest Cal hater and attended our worst game of the season, but keep in mind how other fans are prob feeling since their teams all lost the same stakes games today. But someone has to get in and as crazy as it sounds I think we are not out of it. I assure you if our games were on CBS everyone would feel a lot different. Even though both bracketologists opinions mean nothing to what each team actually needs.

Not saying it will happen we could just do our usual CAL BS and blow it but maybe things are about to change and we get one just this once.

TLDR:20-30 all just a guess could be a little more if SCU loses tmrw could be less just a rough guess.

Thanks for keeping it respectful I'm not personally frustrated with you I just think this whole idea of the world falling when in reality the whole world fell is frustrating to see when some of it is just outrageous. I mean the claim that we would need to go to OT in the championship game is just insane lol. Like if we did that I don't think we would be in Dayton. Depending on others we could be a 10 seed if we did that. That would be 2 more Q1s both Q1A 1 against Duke and 1 Q2A.

Note: As I am writing this Auburn is down by 30(now 20). Like this is an example of I think we move past them today even with a loss. We only lost by 7. They have soon to be 15 losses and they are losing by 30. I mean they are gonna be one game above .500 with another loss coming if this is even a discussion.
Onebearofpower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barsad said:

What are people smoking on this thread? No Duke win, no Madness, plan for the NIT Final Four.

Respectfully you have no idea what you are talking about. Look at it from the perspective of all the other bubble teams and how you think they are feeling. You know they have to take the 68 teams still right? If you are so sure name me all the teams on the bubble that you think no matter if they lose in the first game of their tourney, are still above us in Resume if we beat FSU?
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Onebearofpower said:

Thanks hopefully it gives people a better perspective on the bubble as a whole and not just our little bubble of shame as most bubble teams have a bubble of shame right now.

Thank you again for the follow up response to my "percentage to make it" question. Just want to clarify that when I was talking about playing well in the ACC tourney final I never mentioned anything about losing in OT. It was more along the lines of a respectable loss, I.e. single digit. But again your response did make sense at many levels. Unfortunately the real issue with this team is they don't have the personnel to match up with physical teams. Still, anything can happen in a given game.
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Onebearofpower said:

barsad said:

What are people smoking on this thread? No Duke win, no Madness, plan for the NIT Final Four.

Respectfully you have no idea what you are talking about. Look at it from the perspective of all the other bubble teams and how you think they are feeling. You know they have to take the 68 teams still right? If you are so sure name me all the teams on the bubble that you think no matter if they lose in the first game of their tourney, are still above us in Resume if we beat FSU?

I guess we'll come back here in 8 days and find out if I know what I 'm talking about (and every other expert who makes a living doing bracketology). I will sing your praises as a bracket predicting genius and declare that I don't know what I'm talking about, and I'll do it happily because Cal will be in and none of this chatter will mean much.
Onebearofpower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barsad said:

Onebearofpower said:

barsad said:

What are people smoking on this thread? No Duke win, no Madness, plan for the NIT Final Four.

Respectfully you have no idea what you are talking about. Look at it from the perspective of all the other bubble teams and how you think they are feeling. You know they have to take the 68 teams still right? If you are so sure name me all the teams on the bubble that you think no matter if they lose in the first game of their tourney, are still above us in Resume if we beat FSU?

I guess we'll come back here in 8 days and find out if I know what I 'm talking about (and every other expert who makes a living doing bracketology). I will sing your praises as a bracket predicting genius and declare that I don't know what I'm talking about, and I'll do it happily because Cal will be in and none of this chatter will mean much.

What the hell are you talking about every single expert other than Lunardi(and even him) had us in the mix coming into today. Some had us in some had us out. Does that mean that every other bubble team is just not in the mix now because they all lost too?? No it doesn't. But you won't give me teams and their resumes because you don't actually wanna have a real debate about it you just wanna say it's over.
Onebearofpower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RedlessWardrobe said:

Onebearofpower said:

Thanks hopefully it gives people a better perspective on the bubble as a whole and not just our little bubble of shame as most bubble teams have a bubble of shame right now.

Thank you again for the follow up response to my "percentage to make it" question. Just want to clarify that when I was talking about playing well in the ACC tourney final I never mentioned anything about losing in OT. It was more along the lines of a respectable loss, I.e. single digit. But again your response did make sense at many levels. Unfortunately the real issue with this team is they don't have the personnel to match up with physical teams. Still, anything can happen in a given game.

Yeah np I was referring to the OP with regards to the OT comment their original statement was that we had to win the ACC or lose in OT. Yeah I agree I'm not here to say who is going to make it or what is going to happen in each game but not everyone will win every game so it isn't as simple as we are done.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Onebearofpower said:

barsad said:

Onebearofpower said:

barsad said:

What are people smoking on this thread? No Duke win, no Madness, plan for the NIT Final Four.

Respectfully you have no idea what you are talking about. Look at it from the perspective of all the other bubble teams and how you think they are feeling. You know they have to take the 68 teams still right? If you are so sure name me all the teams on the bubble that you think no matter if they lose in the first game of their tourney, are still above us in Resume if we beat FSU?

I guess we'll come back here in 8 days and find out if I know what I 'm talking about (and every other expert who makes a living doing bracketology). I will sing your praises as a bracket predicting genius and declare that I don't know what I'm talking about, and I'll do it happily because Cal will be in and none of this chatter will mean much.

What the hell are you talking about every single expert other than Lunardi(and even him) had us in the mix coming into today. Some had us in some had us out. Does that mean that every other bubble team is just not in the mix now because they all lost too?? No it doesn't. But you won't give me teams and their resumes because you don't actually wanna have a real debate about it you just wanna say it's over.


Let's be clear: if we beat FSU but lose to Duke do you think we: A) still have a good chance or B) have almost no chance?
Onebearofpower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

Onebearofpower said:

barsad said:

Onebearofpower said:

barsad said:

What are people smoking on this thread? No Duke win, no Madness, plan for the NIT Final Four.

Respectfully you have no idea what you are talking about. Look at it from the perspective of all the other bubble teams and how you think they are feeling. You know they have to take the 68 teams still right? If you are so sure name me all the teams on the bubble that you think no matter if they lose in the first game of their tourney, are still above us in Resume if we beat FSU?

I guess we'll come back here in 8 days and find out if I know what I 'm talking about (and every other expert who makes a living doing bracketology). I will sing your praises as a bracket predicting genius and declare that I don't know what I'm talking about, and I'll do it happily because Cal will be in and none of this chatter will mean much.

What the hell are you talking about every single expert other than Lunardi(and even him) had us in the mix coming into today. Some had us in some had us out. Does that mean that every other bubble team is just not in the mix now because they all lost too?? No it doesn't. But you won't give me teams and their resumes because you don't actually wanna have a real debate about it you just wanna say it's over.


Let's be clear: if we beat FSU but lose to Duke do you think we: A) still have a good chance or B) have almost no chance?

Why not just answer my question? I already wrote out virtually every teams resume. I think we still have a good chance but I would have do a lot of complex math to actually find out what the statistics are on it based on everyone's chance of winning etc. Or ask me after all the games are over then I will have a better answer but right now it is pretty hard to say without calculating the odds of it. For example if you asked me before today what I thought if we lost today, I would have said we are probably going to need to win 2 games in the ACC tourney but I wasn't assuming that every single bubble team was going to lose and some really badly.

So I ask again, what teams on the bubble do you think that no matter if they lose in the first game of their tourney, are still above us in Resume if we beat FSU?
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Onebearofpower said:

calumnus said:

Onebearofpower said:

barsad said:

Onebearofpower said:

barsad said:

What are people smoking on this thread? No Duke win, no Madness, plan for the NIT Final Four.

Respectfully you have no idea what you are talking about. Look at it from the perspective of all the other bubble teams and how you think they are feeling. You know they have to take the 68 teams still right? If you are so sure name me all the teams on the bubble that you think no matter if they lose in the first game of their tourney, are still above us in Resume if we beat FSU?

I guess we'll come back here in 8 days and find out if I know what I 'm talking about (and every other expert who makes a living doing bracketology). I will sing your praises as a bracket predicting genius and declare that I don't know what I'm talking about, and I'll do it happily because Cal will be in and none of this chatter will mean much.

What the hell are you talking about every single expert other than Lunardi(and even him) had us in the mix coming into today. Some had us in some had us out. Does that mean that every other bubble team is just not in the mix now because they all lost too?? No it doesn't. But you won't give me teams and their resumes because you don't actually wanna have a real debate about it you just wanna say it's over.


Let's be clear: if we beat FSU but lose to Duke do you think we: A) still have a good chance or B) have almost no chance?

Why not just answer my question? I already wrote out virtually every teams resume. I think we still have a good chance but I would have do a lot of complex math to actually find out what the statistics are on it based on everyone's chance of winning etc. Or ask me after all the games are over then I will have a better answer but right now it is pretty hard to say without calculating the odds of it. For example if you asked me before today what I thought if we lost today, I would have said we are probably going to need to win 2 games in the ACC tourney but I wasn't assuming that every single bubble team was going to lose and some really badly.

So I ask again, what teams on the bubble do you think that no matter if they lose in the first game of their tourney, are still above us in Resume if we beat FSU?

I asked a simple A or B question.

Your question does not seem very relevant. It is not any one team that will keep us out so picking them is not necessary. I am sure there are multiple teams that will still be ahead of us even if they lose and we beat FSU, but importantly there will be plenty who will win and stay ahead of us.

You listed 21 teams? Assuming every team has a 50/50 chance of winning their next game (the odds are probably higher), the chance that we win and the other 21 teams lose would be (.5)^22 or .00002%, essentially zero. The most likely result is at least 10 or 11 win and then 5 or more go to win another game.

Beating FSU is almost certainly not going to be enough to get us in. It is really going to come down to beating Duke. That would be the end of the season statement that we belong, that we have a chance of making a run.
We could still get screwed by the Committee, but that is our path.
6956bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnfox said:

Two of these teams have to be in right now

SMU (lost)
Virginia Tech (lost)
Cal (lost)
Auburn (play later)
Stanford (won, were way out)
Indiana (losing)
New Mexico (lost)
USC (play later)

Maybe still throw a bone to a few others like OKST, Cincy & SDSU further out. USF sleeper

Per T3 Bracketology

It is really quite amazing that literally everything Cal needed to have happen outside winning their own game did happen. So while I do believe Cal is likely out yesterday did give the team an outside chance of still getting an at large bid.

But they need to beat FSU. They need to make a compelling case that they deserve to be the 8th ACC team in. FSU is really hard matchup for Cal right now. They had trouble guarding Harris and FSU has 2 or 3 guys that will be really tough matchups for Cal. Wiggins is a big 4 that can stretch the floor. Robert McCray is a strong athletic and big PG that is a 3 level scorer and very good distributor. And they have complimentary parts that are playing really well right now.

FSU is both athletic and big. That is a tough combo. They are inconsistent shooting the ball and will allow some looks from 3. They do not rebound the ball as well as their size and athletic ability suggests. But they are playing really well and present some difficult matchups. This is not the same team that Cal almost beat early in the ACC season.

6956bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Onebearofpower said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

Onebearofpower said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

Honestly, even if we were to beat FSU and by some miracle Duke, we are still not in. Really.

Please explain how we wouldn't be in by beating the number 1 team in the nation when every bubble team lost today.

Because the committee goes by the entire season. They don't look at one day, or one win. Our overall power ranking is too low. How many of those other bubble teams lost to a team like Pitt? Highly unlikely.

If we were to win 3 straight in the ACC, and then play a competitive championship game we'd probably make it.
Anything short of that forget it. (Of course I would be more than happy to eat my words.)

I'm sorry but you are just dead wrong. And it seems like you just don't know the resumes of these teams or something or the fact that you can't get passed when you lose a Q1 on the road by 7 and literally every bubble team also some badly.

I'll give you the bubble and their losses:

Ohio State(hardly bubble) also lost to Pitt.
NC State has lost 6 of their last 7 and lost a Quad 4 to Georgia Tech.
18-13 Indiana has lost 5 of their last 6 and they lost to Northwestern at home.
19-12 SMU who we have a head to head win against, has lost their last four games, no horrible losses but they did lose to LSU(worst team in the SEC) at a neutral site.
18-12 Texas has lost 3 of their last 4 and plays another non tourney team today, they lost to Miss State at home.
16-14 Auburn has lost 7 of their last nine and lost to both Ole Miss and Miss State. They also play Alabama tonight so they are in not unlikely shape to end with 15 regular season losses.
24-7 SCU has lost to #304 Loyola Chicago and they haven't beaten a soul other than Saint Mary's.
21-10 TCU(Likely in and off the bubble) has lost to #212 New Orleans at home and Notre Dame at home.
21-9 New Mexico has lost to both #189 New Mexico State and #82 CSU at home. They have also lost three of their last 4.
20-10 SDSU has lost to #141 Troy and has also lost 4 of their last six games.
20-10 UCF has lost their last 3 games all to projected non tournament teams and one of which was Q3 to Oklahoma State.
20-10 Missouri(I would guess is prob in) Has lost their last two and lost to Notre Dame, Ole Miss, and LSU.
18-13 WVU has lost 4 of their last 6 and has lost to #127 Utah, Xavier, and multiple other non tourney teams.
20-10 Ugh Stanford has lost to #111 UNLV, #119 Seattle, and Notre Dame all at home.
24-7 VCU lost to #96 George Mason and has not beaten a single projected at large team and their quad 1s(2) are hanging on to the boundary at 49(50) and 75(75).
18-13 Okla ST no real bad bad losses but also only two Q1s and losses to many non tournament teams(plus OKSU is off the bubble by a little bit).
19-12 VTU lost by 23 to FSU at home formerly Q3, they don't have any real bad losses but they also only have two Q1s.
20-10 Texas A&M is prob in and doesn't have any bad losses
17-14 Cinncinati lost to #240 Eastern Michigan and Xavier
20-11 Seton Hall has two Q3 losses and lost to Depaul TWICE and Creighton and Butler.
18-12 USC has lost to UW twice, Northwestern, Oregon, and oh they have lost 6 straight and are likely to lose again. They also lost their best player.
SLU just lost by 30 today who knows where they are in all of this.
The Net isn't a science and this is a very weird year. We are below #60 BSU who is 20-13 and lost to Hawaii Pacific to start the year and also lost to #111 UNLV twice this year.


I think frankly you just gotta research these teams because it isn't as clear cut as "they have a higher NET", it is about the resume it always has been. And if everyone else didn't lose today we would be in a lot worse of a situation but they did so we can't fall very far when literally every team lost and our loss isn't bad especially as it is Q1 and only by 7. Many teams lost at home against worse competition.

I also think the Bid Stealing is getting blown out of proportion. If you think that KSU is going to win the Big 12 then that is fine but it is so so unlikely. The only real bid stealer threats are Saint Joseph's, Dayton, George Mason in the A10. Colorado State, Nevada, prob BSU, and GCU in the MW. And Akron in the MAC. Nobody else is even close to a serious threat and even those are pretty unlikely to occur.

Teams like UMN and SDSU are not bid stealers because we aren't losing an at large spot for them as they would be in if they made their Conf. Tourney games. Same goes for VCU and Seton Hall. Wouldn't be good for us but that doesn't take away a bid from the whole bubble it is just a bubble team improving their resume.

We have 4Q1 Wins and you can't take that away from us. And they are against legit teams also not freaking Northwestern who has wayyyy too high a Net for their performance, they have been against good tournament teams and then our biggest rival who has also beat many good teams(They just have way more Q3 losses). Many of these teams have half of that or less and still have a bad loss or two. If they lose in their Tourneys they are also in big trouble.

I think anyone that is saying we need to make the championship game in the ACC or doesn't think we are in for sure if we beat Duke, isn't fully understanding the bubble situations and how likely a bid stealer actually is. If you're gonna talk about predictives then I'm not sure why we are even playing the games then. The predictives have been wrong for like half our games and many many others because they can't account for so many intangibles and they don't actually value winning the game.

Today was a horribly sad loss that was partially on the players in the second half, but also on the officials for screwing us over time and time again and letting Wake stay in the game and giving them momentum. But let's not let it cloud our vision on what the bubble actually looks like and what teams are doing around us. Let's take it one day at time and beat FSU. If we do that I guarantee we won't know for sure that our season and dancing hopes are dead.

I think what you say has some merit. You can literally make a case for any of the teams above. Cal has decent resume metrics but are much weaker in the predictive measures.

The bracketologists generally do not like Cal. And I think a big reason is the NET ranking. The NET is artificaly low due to the poor non conference schedule.

Lunardi in particular I think values the NET over many other metrics. And it did not help that when he was at the Pitt game Cal decided to play their worst game of the year against a poor opponent.

What is always an unknown but important is the committee itself. These are people and some carry significant sway in college athletics. Last year the committee rewarded UNC with a bid that very few felt they deserved. But UNC AD Bubba Cunningham was the committee chair. This year the committee chair is Keith Gill commisioner of the Sun Belt. The ACC is represented by John Wildhack the current Syracuse AD. Will he push for the ACC? Greg Byrne the Alabama AD is on the committee and no doubt will push SEC teams hard.

This years bubble is soft. A lot of very flawed teams. Cal is not in a good position to be sure, but most of the teams you list above are not either.

So what is most important? The NET. WAB ratings. Quad 1 wins. Bad losses. Cal had a chance yesterday to get on the right side of the bubble due to results elsewhere. They did not capitalize. I am not sure beating FSU will make a difference despite how well FSU is playing now. But lets win and see what happens. It is unlikely that we see results like yesterday continue in the conference tourneys. But I did not think it would have happened yesterday either.

RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
6956bear said: "FSU is both athletic and big. That is a tough combo."

I will add to that - "especially for our team."
Last Page
Page 1 of 4
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.