2) In higher end neighborhoods, many K through 9 student are in direct to home internet schools associated with colleges that are taught by college professors (e.g., ASU). People thought that this would be just a hangover from C-19 shutdown, but instead it has become an alternative since wealthy people view the CA public schools as crappy even in well to do areas, and they have their own social network for their kids.
3) Reduced birth rates
4) Lower immigration (and likely in future years the impact of enforcement)
5) Migration by younger families for various reasons such as affordability. This may becoming a very important factor, especially as business moves out of state.
This has all sorts of implications. Over 100 California school districts have issued at least 2,400-5,000+ preliminary layoff notices to staff for the 2026-27 school year per the CA Teacher's Association. And most Districts are looking at budget cuts.Declining enrollment often leads to consolidating or closing school sites to manage costs, which can be disruptive to students. School bonds are starting to face voter opposition.
There are many ways districts can reduce programs or services, but they can only operate severely under enrolled schools for so long before the situation becomes financially untenable. In the short run there are fixed costs associated with operating school sites, including maintenance, utilities, custodial services, and administration, that simply can't be cut quickly. Folks in Fresno are about to find out, and it is getting ugly. Academics also think there is an equity issue as wealth families have alternatives such as expensive on line college plans for grade schools, where a parent is home to make sure the kids are paying attention.
With CA running such a huge deficit, I don't see any meaningful support coming from the State. This is a long run problem, and critical for colleges like Cal that admit many CA public educated students.
I await everyone's snarky remarks.
