DNC releases its autopsy and it's an embarrassingly incompetent mess

1,665 Views | 27 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by PAC-10-BEAR
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They must have outsourced the Department of Justice to remove all the references to Israel, Biden, and genocide.



Full report available in article linked to this article:
https://apnews.com/article/democratic-national-committee-autopsy-2024-ken-martin-a4f67256b4c56ba076aece23c22728ad
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It will be a good guide and help as a playbook to learn from. It's fine.

The embarrassing incompetent mess is the leadership in place now.

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another high speed train to nowhere
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

It will be a good guide and help as a playbook to learn from. It's fine.

The embarrassing incompetent mess is the leadership in place now.

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN


A good guide? Yes please use that as the Democratic Party guide
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
**Executive summary of the leaked DNC "Build to Win. Build to Last" after-action report (May 20, 2026):**

It's a post-2024 autopsy urging a 10-year plan to rebuild as majority party. Key points: Trump won presidency + popular vote; Blue Wall collapsed; down-ballot Dems (e.g. Stein, Slotkin) outperformed Harris by running local/economic affirmative campaigns.

Critiques: National effort failed to define Harris beyond "not Trump," leaned on negative partisanship, late/seasonal organizing, poor media mix (over-relied on broadcast), lost ground with men, rural voters, and Latinos.

Recommendations: "Win Anywhere" strategy, year-round "always on" infrastructure/organizing, shift media to digital/CTV, focus on heartland/South/rural/male voters, and build real voter connections over seasonal pushes.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

DNC is still in denial.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Probably was not a factor either way, Trump is old and in significant decline as well

https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-donald-trump-79-is-declining-in-plain-sight-doctor/


In plain sight.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

Probably was not a factor either way, Trump is old and in significant decline as well

In plain sight.

Of course it was a factor, otherwise Kamala wouldn't have been the nominee.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

SBGold said:

Probably was not a factor either way, Trump is old and in significant decline as well

In plain sight.

Of course it was a factor, otherwise Kamala wouldn't have been the nominee.


His argument makes no sense. Kamala for president existed solely because it was a massive factor
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"A draft of an internal Democratic autopsy of the 2024 presidential election released Thursday argues that former Vice President Kamala Harris's campaign failed to make an "affirmative case" for her, did not sufficiently separate her from President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and was hurt by a Trump ad attacking her for supporting surgery for transgender inmates."

Hey guys, you don't really need 192 pages and millions of dollars to know that the garbage can is teeming with maggots. Open the lid.
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:

"A draft of an internal Democratic autopsy of the 2024 presidential election released Thursday argues that former Vice President Kamala Harris's campaign failed to make an "affirmative case" for her, did not sufficiently separate her from President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and was hurt by a Trump ad attacking her for supporting surgery for transgender inmates."

Hey guys, you don't really need 192 pages and millions of dollars to know that the garbage can is teeming with maggots. Open the lid.

Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Does anyone know if there was anything in the 192-page report about second guessing the multiple attempts to arrest Trump and the assassination attempts?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Does anyone know if there was anything in the 192-page report about second guessing the multiple attempts to arrest Trump and the assassination attempts?


Reporting on it indicates that it did not substantially discuss the assassination attempts against Trump, nor broader questions about law enforcement hesitation or "second guessing" around arresting/prosecuting him.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Remember, Lawfare only works if the target actually commits the felony……and for that reason, The Trump Revenge Weaponization Tour won't ring up a single conviction.


"Bring it Fat Boy. I'll be waiting."
“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The law's whoever is in charge both East and West of the Pecos. You don't like it, vote for someone else.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It was 192 pages, everything relevant was covered.

It was a good report that has some things to build on.

Our foundation is strong.

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

It was a good report that has some things to build on.

Our foundation is strong.

Democrats are complaining online about what wasn't included in the report: Israel, Palestine, Gaza, etc.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

It was 192 pages, everything relevant was covered.

It was a good report that has some things to build on.

Our foundation is strong.

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN


Like Tedford's playbook, right? Just need to build on those 192 pages!
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

SBGold said:

It was 192 pages, everything relevant was covered.

It was a good report that has some things to build on.

Our foundation is strong.

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN


Like Tedford's playbook, right? Just need to build on those 192 pages!

Need clarity on what you mean
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

It was 192 pages, everything relevant was covered.

It was a good report that has some things to build on.

Our foundation is strong.

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN


A good report? It was missing everything, including sources and a conclusion.
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

It was 192 pages, everything relevant was covered.

It was a good report that has some things to build on.

LOL, even loyal Democrats are ripping this POS
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Quote:

June 17, 2024: Abby Phillip opens her show running cover for Biden, then tees up the "Cheap Fakes" narrative:

"A pipeline of videos that aren't telling the full truth….logging the public consciousness as Americans start to think about their votes."

Abby then sets up Brian Stelter to run the White House "Cheap Fakes" hoax, which she uncritically accepts and amplifies:

"Why chop them up and make [the videos] into something that they're not?"

Incredible stuff here, Abby.

PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We need another autopsy report to investigate the DNC autopsy report.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.