as much as I think Trump is an egotistical jerk

4,986 Views | 67 Replies | Last: 23 days ago by bearister
Oakbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am still glad that he was elected rather than any progressive
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oakbear said:

I am still glad that he was elected rather than any progressive


Why is this even a thread?


Oakbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Oakbear said:

I am still glad that he was elected rather than any progressive


Why is this even a thread?




free country and an OT thread so why not
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Oakbear said:

I am still glad that he was elected rather than any progressive

Why is this even a thread?

Why is Diablo Valley a thread? No one cares except you.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'll support your thread.

Partial list of damage Trump has caused to our country:

Democratic Institutions: Critics frequently point to his efforts to challenge the 2020 election results, his role in the January 6th insurrection, and his public undermining of the judicial and intelligence systems.

Watchdog groups have heavily scrutinized allegations of conflicts of interest and unprecedented corruption.

Foreign Relations: Observers note that his unilateral approach to global issues, trade disputes, and questioning of traditional security alliances (like NATO) have alienated longtime democratic allies and weakened U.S. global influence.

Economic Policy: Economists and business organizations argue that his sweeping trade wars and unilateral tariffs have led to higher inflation, disrupted supply chains, and placed a heavier financial burden on the average American family.

Federal Management: Critics cite a severe hollowing out of institutional knowledge through the politicization of civil service roles, the dismantling of agencies such as USAID, and massive executive turnover as major harm to government effectiveness.

Immigration & Human Rights: Human rights organizations have strongly condemned actions such as family separations at the border, policies limiting the right to asylum, and plans for mass deportations, citing violations of human dignity and international law.

Environmental Rollbacks: Environmental groups argue that his sweeping rollbacks of clean energy initiatives and environmental regulations have actively worsened climate change and jeopardized U.S. competitiveness in future sustainable technologies.

Partial listing of Trump's corruption during his second term:

Business Expansion: Trump has expanded his real estate and business holdings. The Trump Organization continues to develop and operate international properties, creating pathways for foreign governments and state officials to patronize his establishments.

Digital Grift: The Trump family has launched and heavily promoted various digital assets, cryptocurrency ventures (such as World Liberty Financial), and merchandise. Watchdogs argue these initiatives monetize his political influence.

Property Visits & Events: Special interest groups, foreign dignitaries, and political committees routinely hold events at Trump-owned properties and golf courses.

Pay-to-Play AccusationsWatchdog groups describe the administration's approach as openly transactional, citing a "pay-to-play" relationship between the presidency and major donors.

Appointments & Access: Critics allege that large-dollar political contributors and loyalists have been rewarded with ambassadorships, Cabinet-level positions, and regulatory advisory roles.

Lobbying and Policy Favors: Major corporate donors and special interests have gained direct access to policymakers, allegedly resulting in policy changes, regulatory rollbacks, and dropped federal investigations.

Clemency and Justice System AbusesThe presidential pardon power has been a major point of contention during Trump's second term. Critics and legal scholars, such as those at the Campaign Legal Center, argue that the clemency process has been transformed into a loyalty-based transactional tool.

Donor & Ally Pardons: Pardons and commutations have been granted to political allies, January 6th defendants, and prominent corporate figures or former government officials convicted of corruption and financial crimes.

Dismantling Ethics and Accountability Structures

The administration has faced criticism for systematically weakening longstanding ethical guardrails and anti-corruption safeguards.

Oversight: The removal and reassignment of several Inspectors General and independent officials has raised concerns about reduced capacity to investigate waste, fraud, and abuse.

Dismantling Integrity Units: The administration sidelined the Department of Justice's Public Integrity Section, which traditionally investigates and prosecutes political corruption.

Deregulation & Conflict of InterestObservers have highlighted inherent conflicts of interest regarding key appointments and administrative actions.

Regulatory Rollbacks: Key regulatory and enforcement agencies have seen their enforcement capabilities severely limited, particularly within the crypto and financial sectors, as well as the corporate sector more broadly.

Self-Policing: Several political appointees and advisors with extensive private portfolios in defense, energy, and tech have been allowed to shape federal policy in areas directly tied to their own commercial interests.

Trump's misuse of DOJ

Prosecution of Political Rivals: Critics and former DOJ officials argue that Trump has pressured the DOJ to launch investigations and indictments against his perceived political and legal opponents, such as former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

Targeting Accusers: The DOJ launched a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carrollthe woman who successfully sued Trump for sexual abuse and defamationover allegations of perjury regarding the funding of her civil lawsuits. Critics have pointed to this as a clear example of the president utilizing federal powers to settle private scores.

Disbanding and Purging the Department: Following his inauguration for his second term, the Trump administration engaged in a massive overhaul of the DOJ. This included the dismissal of prosecutors involved in the January 6th investigations, as well as the reassignment or firing of numerous career officials, ethics professionals, and leadership staff across the Civil Rights and Public Integrity sections.

The "Anti-Weaponization Fund": The DOJ settled a private $10 billion lawsuit brought by Trump against the IRS and established a nearly $1.8 billion fund designed to compensate political allies who claim they suffered "weaponization and lawfare" by the government. Critics have condemned this as an unprecedented and unlawful use of taxpayer money.

Trump Mishandling of Iran Military Conflict

Following his return to the presidency, Trump ordered joint U.S.-Israeli military strikes against Iran on February 28, 2026, launching an open war aimed at destroying Iran's nuclear and military infrastructure. The conflict has faced extensive domestic and international backlash.

No Consultation or Coalition: Former National Security Advisor John Bolton and congressional leaders criticized Trump for launching major combat operations without building an international coalition, consulting allies, or securing prior authorization from Congress.

Severe Economic Fallouts: Trump reportedly believed Iran lacked the capability to close the crucial Strait of Hormuz. However, Iran blocked the waterway immediately, paralyzing maritime traffic, forcing a U.S. naval blockade, and driving up global energy prices.

Shifting Objectives and Timelines: Critics slam the administration's messaging as erratic. Trump initially claimed the war would be won within "four to five weeks" and repeatedly stated that Iran's military was entirely "crushed". However, U.S. intelligence later revealed that Iran retained substantial underground missile capabilities, and the White House's rationale continually shifted between enforcing a regime change and merely degrading military assets.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oakbear said:

I am still glad that he was elected rather than any progressive


You must enjoy massive inflation, a $1.8 trillion annual budget deficit, and another endless war.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

DiabloWags said:

Oakbear said:

I am still glad that he was elected rather than any progressive

Why is this even a thread?

Why is Diablo Valley a thread? No one cares except you.


Even though I only scored 1000 on my SAT I'm still able to know the difference between creating a thread based on a TOPIC versus one's opinion.

Surely, stating one's opinion about Trump can be included in a thread that ALREADY EXISTS.

It should be OBVIOUS that "Diablo Valley" is a TOPIC.
Not merely an OPINION.


BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Aunburdened said:

DiabloWags said:

Oakbear said:

I am still glad that he was elected rather than any progressive

Why is this even a thread?

Why is Diablo Valley a thread? No one cares except you.


Even though I only scored 1000 on my SAT I'm still able to know the difference between creating a thread based on a TOPIC versus one's opinion.

Surely, stating one's opinion about Trump can be included in a thread that ALREADY EXISTS.

It should be OBVIOUS that "Diablo Valley" is a TOPIC.
Not merely an OPINION.





If you called out people consistently for doing this, I'd support your argument
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

Aunburdened said:

DiabloWags said:

Oakbear said:

I am still glad that he was elected rather than any progressive

Why is this even a thread?

Why is Diablo Valley a thread? No one cares except you.


Even though I only scored 1000 on my SAT I'm still able to know the difference between creating a thread based on a TOPIC versus one's opinion.

Surely, stating one's opinion about Trump can be included in a thread that ALREADY EXISTS.

It should be OBVIOUS that "Diablo Valley" is a TOPIC.
Not merely an OPINION.





If you called out people consistently for doing this, I'd support your argument


I dont call people out here.
Im not a moderator.
Not my job.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

Aunburdened said:

DiabloWags said:

Oakbear said:

I am still glad that he was elected rather than any progressive

Why is this even a thread?

Why is Diablo Valley a thread? No one cares except you.


Even though I only scored 1000 on my SAT I'm still able to know the difference between creating a thread based on a TOPIC versus one's opinion.

Surely, stating one's opinion about Trump can be included in a thread that ALREADY EXISTS.

It should be OBVIOUS that "Diablo Valley" is a TOPIC.
Not merely an OPINION.





If you called out people consistently for doing this, I'd support your argument


I dont call people out here.
Im not a moderator.
Not my job.



Except you did in this thread

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/134764/replies/2698901

Like I said, I'd support the thought if you were consistent about it instead of only calling it out on one side
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

DiabloWags said:

Oakbear said:

I am still glad that he was elected rather than any progressive

Why is this even a thread?

Why is Diablo Valley a thread? No one cares except you.


Not True!
I really like the Diablo Valley thread. It brings a sliver of a smile to my face, something much needed in this OT land.

Do you have a thread title that you've created that you think I might like?

Okaydo has the Breaking News thread.
Bearister has the Trump Grift thread.
Sluggo has the soccer thread.
DiabloWags has Worst President In My Life thread.
I've got Obituaries.

What signature thread do you have?
All I can think of is a bunch of distortion.
This is a real softball opportunity for you. Have at it.


BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

Aunburdened said:

DiabloWags said:

Oakbear said:

I am still glad that he was elected rather than any progressive

Why is this even a thread?

Why is Diablo Valley a thread? No one cares except you.


Not True!
I really like the Diablo Valley thread. It brings a sliver of a smile to my face, something much needed in this OT land.

Do you have a thread title that you've created that you think I might like?

Okaydo has the Breaking News thread.
Bearister has the Trump Grift thread.
Sluggo has the soccer thread.
DiabloWags has Worst President In My Life thread.
I've got Obituaries.

What signature thread do you have?
All I can think of is a bunch of distortion.


IMO, Nobody should care about a "signature thread" on an anonymous online forum.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oakbear said:

I am still glad that he was elected rather than any progressive


Please focus your political opinions on POLICIES rather than PERSONALITIES or labels of groups of people, which is really very silly of you.

Another softball opportunity for you to state what you like and don't like, just narrowed to reflect your intelligence and values.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

Oakbear said:

I am still glad that he was elected rather than any progressive


Please focus your political opinions on POLICIES rather than PERSONALITIES or labels of groups of people, which is really very silly of you.



This seems like a very hypocritical post.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

Aunburdened said:

DiabloWags said:

Oakbear said:

I am still glad that he was elected rather than any progressive

Why is this even a thread?

Why is Diablo Valley a thread? No one cares except you.


Not True!
I really like the Diablo Valley thread. It brings a sliver of a smile to my face, something much needed in this OT land.

Do you have a thread title that you've created that you think I might like?




Kidney Stones | Bear Insider
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

concordtom said:

Aunburdened said:

DiabloWags said:

Oakbear said:

I am still glad that he was elected rather than any progressive

Why is this even a thread?

Why is Diablo Valley a thread? No one cares except you.


Not True!
I really like the Diablo Valley thread. It brings a sliver of a smile to my face, something much needed in this OT land.

Do you have a thread title that you've created that you think I might like?




Kidney Stones | Bear Insider



Aun didn't create that, I did and I keep my thread creation to a minimum as most info can fit in an already existing thread. Are you going to respond to my other post where you claimed to not call people out since you're trying to call people out again?

I don't get my rocks off my boasting about my threads and how many views and how many responses like some posters do here.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

concordtom said:

Aunburdened said:

DiabloWags said:

Oakbear said:

I am still glad that he was elected rather than any progressive

Why is this even a thread?

Why is Diablo Valley a thread? No one cares except you.


Not True!
I really like the Diablo Valley thread. It brings a sliver of a smile to my face, something much needed in this OT land.

Do you have a thread title that you've created that you think I might like?




Kidney Stones | Bear Insider



Good call!
I simply don't read some people.

The advice for kidneys stones is remarkably simple and is a fool proof solution, but is very difficult to accomplish unless one is very disciplined. I know. I've had kidney stones. And I don't like having to pee all the time.

Drink one gallon of water every day.
This constant flushing overcomes the diets which may produce a calcium oxalate stone, a uric acid stone, etc.

Escaping to pot smoking probably inhibits one's water consumption.

You're welcome.

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

DiabloWags said:

concordtom said:

Aunburdened said:

DiabloWags said:

Oakbear said:

I am still glad that he was elected rather than any progressive

Why is this even a thread?

Why is Diablo Valley a thread? No one cares except you.


Not True!
I really like the Diablo Valley thread. It brings a sliver of a smile to my face, something much needed in this OT land.

Do you have a thread title that you've created that you think I might like?




Kidney Stones | Bear Insider



Good call!
I simply don't read some people.

The advice for kidneys stones is remarkably simple and is a fool proof solution, but is very difficult to accomplish unless one is very disciplined. I know. I've had kidney stones. And I don't like having to pee all the time.

Drink one gallon of water every day.
This constant flushing overcomes the diets which may produce a calcium oxalate stone, a uric acid stone, etc.

Escaping to pot smoking probably inhibits one's water consumption.

You're welcome.



Yeah you're wrong but good try. I drink more water than anyone you know, still get kidney stones. I stick to a strict diet as well. Thank goodness you're not a doctor
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

DiabloWags said:

concordtom said:

Aunburdened said:

DiabloWags said:

Oakbear said:

I am still glad that he was elected rather than any progressive

Why is this even a thread?

Why is Diablo Valley a thread? No one cares except you.


Not True!
I really like the Diablo Valley thread. It brings a sliver of a smile to my face, something much needed in this OT land.

Do you have a thread title that you've created that you think I might like?




Kidney Stones | Bear Insider



Good call!
I simply don't read some people.

The advice for kidneys stones is remarkably simple and is a fool proof solution, but is very difficult to accomplish unless one is very disciplined. I know. I've had kidney stones. And I don't like having to pee all the time.

Drink one gallon of water every day.
This constant flushing overcomes the diets which may produce a calcium oxalate stone, a uric acid stone, etc.

Escaping to pot smoking probably inhibits one's water consumption.

You're welcome.



Yeah you're wrong but good try. I drink more water than anyone you know, still get kidney stones. I stick to a strict diet as well. Thank goodness you're not a doctor


A BI solution to all problems is to publish reams of AI slop and think you made a point.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:


A BI solution to all problems is to publish reams of AI slop and think you made a point.


I would be very hard pressed to ask for medical advice on a forum like this.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Anarchistbear said:


A BI solution to all problems is to publish reams of AI slop and think you made a point.


I would be very hard pressed to ask for medical advice on a forum like this.



Not really… didn't you start a whole thread on colon health?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

Anarchistbear said:


A BI solution to all problems is to publish reams of AI slop and think you made a point.


I would be very hard pressed to ask for medical advice on a forum like this.



Not really… didn't you start a whole thread on colon health?


Yes, I created a thread last March since March is Colon Cancer Awareness Month.
I did nothing other than recommend that people get SCREENED.


BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

Anarchistbear said:


A BI solution to all problems is to publish reams of AI slop and think you made a point.


I would be very hard pressed to ask for medical advice on a forum like this.



Not really… didn't you start a whole thread on colon health?


Yes, I created a thread last March since March is Colon Cancer Awareness Month.
I did nothing other than recommend that people get SCREENED.
That is, before a troll showed up.




So you posted medical advice on here? Interesting. I thought this wasn't the place for medical advice
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

DiabloWags said:

concordtom said:

Aunburdened said:

DiabloWags said:

Oakbear said:

I am still glad that he was elected rather than any progressive

Why is this even a thread?

Why is Diablo Valley a thread? No one cares except you.


Not True!
I really like the Diablo Valley thread. It brings a sliver of a smile to my face, something much needed in this OT land.

Do you have a thread title that you've created that you think I might like?




Kidney Stones | Bear Insider



Good call!
I simply don't read some people.

The advice for kidneys stones is remarkably simple and is a fool proof solution, but is very difficult to accomplish unless one is very disciplined. I know. I've had kidney stones. And I don't like having to pee all the time.

Drink one gallon of water every day.
This constant flushing overcomes the diets which may produce a calcium oxalate stone, a uric acid stone, etc.

Escaping to pot smoking probably inhibits one's water consumption.

You're welcome.



Yeah you're wrong but good try. I drink more water than anyone you know, still get kidney stones. I stick to a strict diet as well. Thank goodness you're not a doctor


A BI solution to all problems is to publish reams of AI slop and think you made a point.


I've edited the answer with a bold sentence in order to MAKE MY POINT

Does drinking one gallon of water a day prevent new kidney stone formation ?

Quote:

Short answer: Drinking one gallon of water per day (3.8 L) significantly reduces the risk of forming new kidney stones if it results in producing at least 2 - 2.5 liters of urine per day, which is the threshold shown to prevent stone formation. It is one of the strongest proven prevention strategies, but not a guarantee on its own.

---

Does one gallon per day prevent stones?

Yes - if it keeps your urine dilute enough.
All major medical sources agree that high fluid intake is the #1 most effective prevention method for kidney stones:

Harvard Health: Drinking enough water to produce 2 liters of urine/day reduces stone formation.
Cleveland Clinic: Recommends 96 - 110 oz/day (2.8 - 3.2 L) of fluid to prevent stones.
National Kidney Foundation: Staying wellhydrated dilutes stoneforming minerals and lowers risk. kidney.org


One gallon (128 oz / 3.8 L) is above these recommendations, so for most people it is enough to keep urine dilute - unless you sweat heavily, live in a hot climate, or have high urine solute loads.

---

Why hydration works

Kidney stones form when urine becomes concentrated enough that minerals (calcium, oxalate, uric acid) crystallize. Dilution prevents this by:

Lowering calcium and oxalate concentration
Increasing urine volume
Increasing citrate (a natural stone inhibitor)


This is why urine color is a practical indicator:

Pale yellow / clear = good
Dark yellow = too concentrated


---

But hydration alone is not always enough

Even with a gallon/day, stones can still form if you have:

High sodium intake (raises urinary calcium)
High animal protein intake (raises uric acid, lowers pH)
High oxalate intake without enough dietary calcium
Low citrate levels
Genetic predisposition
Certain medications


This is why guidelines emphasize a 24hour urine test to identify your specific risk factors. kidney.org

---

Practical target

Goal: Produce 2 - 2.5 L of urine/day
How to know: Urine should stay very light yellow all day.

For most people, this requires 2.5 - 3.5 L of fluid/day.
A gallon/day gives you a margin of safety.

---

Summary

One gallon/day is generally enough to prevent stones if it keeps urine dilute.
Hydration is the most effective single intervention, but not a complete prevention plan.
Diet (salt, protein, calcium, oxalate) and urine chemistry matter just as much.
A 24hour urine test gives personalized prevention guidance.


---

If you want, I can walk you through a personalized prevention plan based on your stone type, diet, and urine chemistry - just choose one:

calciumoxalate prevention
uricacid stone prevention
general hydration strategy
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
" But hydration alone is not always enough"

Welp your own AI slop proved your point wrong. What about if your body creates multiple types of stones, Dr AI?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

Anarchistbear said:


A BI solution to all problems is to publish reams of AI slop and think you made a point.


I would be very hard pressed to ask for medical advice on a forum like this.



Not really… didn't you start a whole thread on colon health?


Yes, I created a thread last March since March is Colon Cancer Awareness Month.
I did nothing other than recommend that people get SCREENED.
That is, before a troll showed up.




So you posted medical advice on here? Interesting. I thought this wasn't the place for medical advice


Suggesting that people get screened for cancer is not medical advice.
It is common sense.

Have a nice day.



BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

Anarchistbear said:


A BI solution to all problems is to publish reams of AI slop and think you made a point.


I would be very hard pressed to ask for medical advice on a forum like this.



Not really… didn't you start a whole thread on colon health?


Yes, I created a thread last March since March is Colon Cancer Awareness Month.
I did nothing other than recommend that people get SCREENED.
That is, before a troll showed up.




So you posted medical advice on here? Interesting. I thought this wasn't the place for medical advice


Suggesting that people get screened for cancer is not medical advice.
It is common sense.





lol I'm not gonna go back and forth with you on this anymore. Giving advice about medical things would be considered, by definition, medical advice. Thank you for your attention to this matter
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

Anarchistbear said:


A BI solution to all problems is to publish reams of AI slop and think you made a point.


I would be very hard pressed to ask for medical advice on a forum like this.



Not really… didn't you start a whole thread on colon health?


Yes, I created a thread last March since March is Colon Cancer Awareness Month.
I did nothing other than recommend that people get SCREENED.
That is, before a troll showed up.




So you posted medical advice on here? Interesting. I thought this wasn't the place for medical advice


Suggesting that people get screened for cancer is not medical advice.
It is common sense.

Have a nice day.


Getting screened = acquiring information.
Action that affects the body = medical advice.

Some people who like to just argue are not worth my valuable time or emotional energy.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

Anarchistbear said:


A BI solution to all problems is to publish reams of AI slop and think you made a point.


I would be very hard pressed to ask for medical advice on a forum like this.



Not really… didn't you start a whole thread on colon health?


Yes, I created a thread last March since March is Colon Cancer Awareness Month.
I did nothing other than recommend that people get SCREENED.
That is, before a troll showed up.




So you posted medical advice on here? Interesting. I thought this wasn't the place for medical advice


Suggesting that people get screened for cancer is not medical advice.
It is common sense.

Have a nice day.


Getting screened = acquiring information.
Action that affects the body = medical advice.


Some people who like to just argue are not worth my valuable time or emotional energy.


Exactly.
Muckieeye
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:



lol I'm not gonna go back and forth with you on this anymore.


Yet more unintended irony/outright hypocrisy. You are hilarious! Do you believe what you type, or are you just unashamed of being blatantly hypocritical?
Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives...
I never meant to say that the Conservatives are generally stupid. I meant to say that stupid people are generally Conservative.
-John Stewart Mill
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

Anarchistbear said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

DiabloWags said:

concordtom said:

Aunburdened said:

DiabloWags said:

Oakbear said:

I am still glad that he was elected rather than any progressive

Why is this even a thread?

Why is Diablo Valley a thread? No one cares except you.


Not True!
I really like the Diablo Valley thread. It brings a sliver of a smile to my face, something much needed in this OT land.

Do you have a thread title that you've created that you think I might like?




Kidney Stones | Bear Insider



Good call!
I simply don't read some people.

The advice for kidneys stones is remarkably simple and is a fool proof solution, but is very difficult to accomplish unless one is very disciplined. I know. I've had kidney stones. And I don't like having to pee all the time.

Drink one gallon of water every day.
This constant flushing overcomes the diets which may produce a calcium oxalate stone, a uric acid stone, etc.

Escaping to pot smoking probably inhibits one's water consumption.

You're welcome.



Yeah you're wrong but good try. I drink more water than anyone you know, still get kidney stones. I stick to a strict diet as well. Thank goodness you're not a doctor


A BI solution to all problems is to publish reams of AI slop and think you made a point.


I've edited the answer with a bold sentence in order to MAKE MY POINT

Does drinking one gallon of water a day prevent new kidney stone formation ?

Quote:

Short answer: Drinking one gallon of water per day (3.8 L) significantly reduces the risk of forming new kidney stones if it results in producing at least 2 - 2.5 liters of urine per day, which is the threshold shown to prevent stone formation. It is one of the strongest proven prevention strategies, but not a guarantee on its own.

---

Does one gallon per day prevent stones?

Yes - if it keeps your urine dilute enough.
All major medical sources agree that high fluid intake is the #1 most effective prevention method for kidney stones:

Harvard Health: Drinking enough water to produce 2 liters of urine/day reduces stone formation.
Cleveland Clinic: Recommends 96 - 110 oz/day (2.8 - 3.2 L) of fluid to prevent stones.
National Kidney Foundation: Staying wellhydrated dilutes stoneforming minerals and lowers risk. kidney.org


One gallon (128 oz / 3.8 L) is above these recommendations, so for most people it is enough to keep urine dilute - unless you sweat heavily, live in a hot climate, or have high urine solute loads.

---

Why hydration works

Kidney stones form when urine becomes concentrated enough that minerals (calcium, oxalate, uric acid) crystallize. Dilution prevents this by:

Lowering calcium and oxalate concentration
Increasing urine volume
Increasing citrate (a natural stone inhibitor)


This is why urine color is a practical indicator:

Pale yellow / clear = good
Dark yellow = too concentrated


---

But hydration alone is not always enough

Even with a gallon/day, stones can still form if you have:

High sodium intake (raises urinary calcium)
High animal protein intake (raises uric acid, lowers pH)
High oxalate intake without enough dietary calcium
Low citrate levels
Genetic predisposition
Certain medications


This is why guidelines emphasize a 24hour urine test to identify your specific risk factors. kidney.org

---

Practical target

Goal: Produce 2 - 2.5 L of urine/day
How to know: Urine should stay very light yellow all day.

For most people, this requires 2.5 - 3.5 L of fluid/day.
A gallon/day gives you a margin of safety.

---

Summary

One gallon/day is generally enough to prevent stones if it keeps urine dilute.
Hydration is the most effective single intervention, but not a complete prevention plan.
Diet (salt, protein, calcium, oxalate) and urine chemistry matter just as much.
A 24hour urine test gives personalized prevention guidance.


---

If you want, I can walk you through a personalized prevention plan based on your stone type, diet, and urine chemistry - just choose one:

calciumoxalate prevention
uricacid stone prevention
general hydration strategy



Arguments for Donald Trump's presidency being considered "great" generally center on his economic policies, reshaping of the judiciary, and disruptive approach to foreign policy. Supporters often point to several key achievements and leadership traits as evidence of his success:The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: Signed into law in 2017, this legislation was the largest overhaul of the U.S. tax code in decades. It significantly lowered the corporate tax rate and provided tax relief to many individual taxpayers, which proponents argue stimulated economic growth and investment.Judicial Appointments: Trump appointed a historic number of conservative judges to the federal bench, including three Supreme Court justicesNeil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. This reshaped the ideological balance of the courts, fulfilling a major promise to his base and securing a long-lasting conservative judiciary.Economic Performance: Supporters frequently highlight the economic conditions prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, including low unemployment rates (which reached historic lows for several demographics like African-American and Hispanic-American workers), steady wage growth, and record highs in the stock market.Foreign Policy and the Abraham Accords: His administration brokered the Abraham Accords, which normalized relations between Israel and several Arab nations, including the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain. Proponents view this as a historic breakthrough in Middle Eastern diplomacy.Trade Policy: Supporters credit Trump with taking a tougher stance on global trade, particularly by pushing back against China's economic practices. His renegotiation of NAFTA into the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) was praised by supporters for better protecting American manufacturing and labor interests.Deregulation: The administration made a concerted effort to roll back federal regulations, particularly in the environmental and financial sectors, arguing that this reduced red tape and fostered a more business-friendly environment.Political Disruption: Admirers view his norm-breaking behavior and unfiltered communication style as strengths. To his supporters, these traits demonstrated that he was an outsider fighting the political establishment and prioritizing the working classan "America First" approach they felt had long been missing in Washington.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:

To his supporters, these traits demonstrated that he was an outsider fighting the political establishment and prioritizing the working class an "America First" approach they felt had long been missing in Washington.


Lmfao.

Ai is funny.
The grifting has never been better!

Dexter Moves to Subpoena Donald Trump Jr. for $670 Million Taxpayer-Funded Deal | Representative Maxine Dexter
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.