Newsom

67,745 Views | 548 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by movielover
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"You're saying that we kicked off 800 fraudulent healthcare providers off of the Medicare system and not a single one of them called the government and said, 'hey, you made a mistake?'"

"It's just completely insane."

- JD Vance to Dr. Oz
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

"You're saying that we kicked off 800 fraudulent healthcare providers off of the Medicare system and not a single one of them called the government and said, 'hey, you made a mistake?'"

"It's just completely insane."

- JD Vance to Dr. Oz



Eight hundred charges of fraud, theft, and repayment?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

"You're saying that we kicked off 800 fraudulent healthcare providers off of the Medicare system and not a single one of them called the government and said, 'hey, you made a mistake?'"

"It's just completely insane."

- JD Vance to Dr. Oz


Eight hundred charges of fraud, theft, and repayment?


Everything is fraud.

Newsom's former Chief of Staff has just pleaded GUILTY to a FRAUD and corruption scheme conspiring to steal $225,000 from a campaign account owned by Xavier Becerra (D)

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facebook, Harris: "BREAKING: Gavin Newsom launched a $23 million state program to provide hearing aids for kids.
Five years later, only 300 hearing aids have been distributed.

That works out to $76,666 per hearing aid.
The same devices retail for about $1,400.

Instead of requiring private insurers to cover pediatric hearing aids, Newsom pushed lawmakers toward a state-run program.

At $1,400 retail for 300 hearing aids, the actual cost would be $420,000.
The state spent $23 million.

When looking into where the money went, the official explanation was "administrative and overhead costs," not hearing aids.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Facebook, Harris: "BREAKING: Gavin Newsom launched a $23 million state program to provide hearing aids for kids.
Five years later, only 300 hearing aids have been distributed.

That works out to $76,666 per hearing aid.
The same devices retail for about $1,400.

Instead of requiring private insurers to cover pediatric hearing aids, Newsom pushed lawmakers toward a state-run program.

At $1,400 retail for 300 hearing aids, the actual cost would be $420,000.
The state spent $23 million.

When looking into where the money went, the official explanation was "administrative and overhead costs," not hearing aids.


Wow. Grift or incompetence?
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gavin Newsom is not a serious person

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

Gavin Newsom is not a serious person




This is entirely illegal and would never hold up in courts. Performative baloney
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What's wrong w Newsom? And if ge can't read, he gets his information from his Marxist staff and kooky wife.

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's called Ai bro.
Are you not familiar with Ai?

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Newsom administration gave over $1 Billion to NGOs routing illegal immigrants into California, including one NGO specializing in bringing HIV patients over the border!

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DY2HtKdOFE5/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

It's called Ai bro.
Are you not familiar with Ai?

Gavin Newsom is artificial un-intelligence, bro.

If he was honest and said he represents all illegal immigrants, I could at least respect him for that.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Paul Randall has six prior convictions for fraud and despite that California allowed him to bill $270 million for services, medications and care that was never provided.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fraud is also committed by white people in red states. Where is the outrage?

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Fraud is also committed by white people in red states. Where is the outrage?




Nice pull from 2022. Fraud is bad, mkay
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

Fraud is also committed by white people in red states. Where is the outrage?




Nice pull from 2022. Fraud is bad, mkay


I agree. He went back 4 years for that nugget, which was a story (4 years ago).
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Fraud is also committed by white people in red states. Where is the outrage?

Start a new "Fraud" thread and we'll post there, easy, no whining necessary.
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:



3.4% of the reason I'd like to see Gavin Newsom become our next President is so I could know that ding-dongs like "Juanita Broaddrick" were losing their s***.

Not sure what's so "hilarious" about a President using the machinery of the federal government to go after sitting governors just because the governor is critical of him.

If it were the other way (say Biden going after Desantis), I doubt you people would think it was "hilarious".
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I find it curious that Juanita Broaddrick, an alleged rape victim (by Clinton), is all-in for Trump, a man who is legally and formally classified as a "sexual abuser" in official federal court documents.

I know Juanita has written and spoken often of the pain and trauma of not being believed because the powerful alleged perpetrator called her a liar and denied it ever happened.

I suppose any empathy you think she would feel for the women in the article below is outweighed by her full embracement of the White Christian Nationalist Movement and its standard bearer.

Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations


*Juanita also probably realizes she was never Trump's "type" so he wouldn't have banged her in any event.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

3.4% of the reason I'd like to see Gavin Newsom become our next President is so I could know that ding-dongs like "Juanita Broaddrick" were losing their s***.

Not sure what's so "hilarious" about a President using the machinery of the federal government to go after sitting governors just because the governor is critical of him.

If it were the other way (say Biden going after Desantis), I doubt you people would think it was "hilarious".


The DOJ probe into Jennifer Siebel Newsom (and related matters involving Gavin Newsom) originated during the Biden administration in 2025.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:




An Executive who can't read?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Big C said:

3.4% of the reason I'd like to see Gavin Newsom become our next President is so I could know that ding-dongs like "Juanita Broaddrick" were losing their s***.

Not sure what's so "hilarious" about a President using the machinery of the federal government to go after sitting governors just because the governor is critical of him.

If it were the other way (say Biden going after Desantis), I doubt you people would think it was "hilarious".


The DOJ probe into Jennifer Siebel Newsom (and related matters involving Gavin Newsom) originated during the Biden administration in 2025.


Lots grifting? They got fire aide money??
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.