Massie stepping up a bit

11,953 Views | 201 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by movielover
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 2:24p, 5/12/26
PAC-10-BEAR said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:


100% wrong. MAGA wants the files released too, as many of us have said on this board


Yet you're devoting a whole lot of time and energy to attack and smear the one Congressman who has done more to pressure Trump to release the Epstein Files than any other.

It was the Trump DOJ who released the files, the largest single declassification of files in U.S. history by far.

Thomas Massie was silent about this during the entire 4 years of the Biden administration in the same way he's silent about many other things that are happening in Congress.


Your guy was not silent about calling the Epstein Files a "Democrat hoax", and Patel has illegally withheld millions of Epstein Files he is required to release under the law that Massie helped pushed through.

Patel is also a filthy liar when he stated under oath that no child were trafficked. Trump is going to pardon him after he bails out in 2 years.
Reply Quote
1
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 2:29p, 5/12/26
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:




By the Massie standard, we must give consideration to the accuser and investigate the claims, and by abstentia, we must smear the target of these claims and imply all kinds of "possible links" that may or may not exist but must be taken seriously.


The $12.2 million that the 3 zionist oligarchs Adelson, Singer and Poulson have spent to dislodge Massie apparently weren't enough, they had to up the ante and throw at him a last minute October Surprise, which is being relayed by paid stooges and fake conservatives like Sideboob Gina there.






But he was mentioned, gotta smear him up the wall like yall do with Trump and the Epstein mentions


Unlike Trump, Massie was never a friend of Epstein, and his wife was not a model sourced by someone who was part of the Epstein circle.


Massie was around this woman so her allegations must be true
Reply Quote
4
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 2:37p, 5/12/26
The hoax is that Trump was involved, not that Epstein wasn't a bad man. This has been explained to you before and you continue to misrepresent what people were saying when they said hoax.
Reply Quote
5
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 2:50p, 5/12/26
Cal88 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:


100% wrong. MAGA wants the files released too, as many of us have said on this board


Yet you're devoting a whole lot of time and energy to attack and smear the one Congressman who has done more to pressure Trump to release the Epstein Files than any other.

It was the Trump DOJ who released the files, the largest single declassification of files in U.S. history by far.

Thomas Massie was silent about this during the entire 4 years of the Biden administration in the same way he's silent about many other things that are happening in Congress.

Your guy was not silent about calling the Epstein Files a "Democrat hoax", and Patel has illegally withheld millions of Epstein Files he is required to release under the law that Massie helped pushed through.

Patel is also a filthy liar when he stated under oath that no child were trafficked. Trump is going to pardon him after he bails out in 2 years.

This is a "good people on both sides" thing all over again which funny enough, was a double hoax. Not only did the media continually try to mislead the public by taking Trump's statements out of context, Democrats funded the SPLC and the Charlottesville protest itself.
Reply Quote
5
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 2:53p, 5/12/26
BearlySane88 said:
The hoax is that Trump was involved, not that Epstein wasn't a bad man.

You're lying, Trump claimed that "the whole Epstein thing was a hoax", and did not refer to his personal involvement while stating that.

Reply Quote
3
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 2:56p, 5/12/26
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
The hoax is that Trump was involved, not that Epstein wasn't a bad man.

You're lying, Trump claimed that "the whole Epstein thing was a hoax", and did not refer to his personal involvement while stating that.



It's ridiculous that you still peddle this. It was very clear he was speaking about the fact that he was involved is a hoax. Like Pac10 said above, just another thing that yall and the media run with that has no validity.
Reply Quote
4
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 8:55p, 5/12/26
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
The hoax is that Trump was involved, not that Epstein wasn't a bad man.

You're lying, Trump claimed that "the whole Epstein thing was a hoax", and did not refer to his personal involvement while stating that.



It's ridiculous that you still peddle this. It was very clear he was speaking about the fact that he was involved is a hoax. Like Pac10 said above, just another thing that yall and the media run with that has no validity.


Reply Quote
1
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 9:27p, 5/12/26
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
The hoax is that Trump was involved, not that Epstein wasn't a bad man.

You're lying, Trump claimed that "the whole Epstein thing was a hoax", and did not refer to his personal involvement while stating that.


BINGO
Reply Quote
3
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:56a, 5/13/26
Reply Quote
4
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 10:56a, 5/13/26
BearlySane88 said:

Reply Quote
1
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:12a, 5/13/26

Reply Quote
1 edit
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 11:42a, 5/13/26
Cal88 said:


Reply Quote
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aunburdened • 12:07p, 5/13/26
It just also dawned on me that the Polymarket result is rigged, they could have easily plunked a chunk of the Adelson-Singer $15M funds into that Polymarket bet, good way to influence voting since I presume they have already saturated local media with their ads.
Reply Quote
2
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:44p, 5/13/26
Reply Quote
1
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:50p, 5/13/26
Reply Quote
1
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 5:50p, 5/13/26
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Now do the Zionists for his astroturfed opponent
Reply Quote
2
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 8:15p, 5/13/26
PAC-10-BEAR said:


He has around 10,000 donors. I doubt Muslims are a significant percentage of his donors, his donor base is widely distributed and largely made up of small donors.


Reply Quote
3
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:11p, 5/13/26
Reply Quote
3
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:35p, 5/14/26
Reply Quote
2
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 8:12p, 5/14/26
PAC-10-BEAR said:


Do you really like Miriam Adelson and Paul Singer that much?
Reply Quote
1
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 8:31p, 5/14/26
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Thank you for motivating me to search for and read this well-written column.


https://archive.is/20260514092810/https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/14/opinion/thomas-massie-trump-republicans.html

Quote:
Stories about Mr. Massie have the feel of tall tales but frequently turn out to be true. The solar-powered mobile chicken coop, a.k.a. the Clucks Capacitor, is designed to move an inch an hour so the chickens always have fresh grass. Then there was the neighbor who asked him for help hiding distilling equipment. (Mr. Massie says he told him he could not get caught up in anything illegal, but that if the man kept driving, there was an old tobacco barn that "rarely gets visited." He heard the truck go back and forth two more times. "I never saw the equipment," he told me. "And nobody went to jail.")

Reply Quote
1
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 11:22p, 5/14/26
Cal88 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Do you really like Miriam Adelson and Paul Singer that much?

I don't even know who Massie's opponent is. It's Kentucky and all.
Reply Quote
2
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 5:50p, 5/15/26
BearlySane88 said:




By the Massie standard, we must give consideration to the accuser and investigate the claims, and by abstentia, we must smear the target of these claims and imply all kinds of "possible links" that may or may not exist but must be taken seriously.

Reply Quote
1
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 1:01a, 5/16/26
Cal88 said:
You know very well that the majority of Massie's donations come from small donors while the AIPAC stand-in is primarily funded by that foreign lobby.

What percentage of money donated to AIPAC comes from foreign sources?
Reply Quote
1
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:54a, 5/17/26
Reply Quote
2
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 12:28p
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Unlike Swalwell, his girlfriend is conscious
Reply Quote
1
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:42p


Reply Quote
1
1 edit
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.