Comey Indicted

14,760 Views | 151 Replies | Last: 27 days ago by DiabloWags
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Indicted but not out!

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

movielover said:

Is the DOJ officially cooking?




I wasn't the biggest fan of Bondi, I thought she was serviceable but the releasing of the Epstein Files was bungled. I blame her even though I'm sure there's many to point fingers at. That being said, I think she probably had a lot of these things lined up. Maybe she didn't think they were ready enough to take public? Maybe Blanche wants to make a splash quickly?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

movielover said:

Is the DOJ officially cooking?



I wasn't the biggest fan of Bondi, I thought she was serviceable but the releasing of the Epstein Files was bungled. I blame her even though I'm sure there's many to point fingers at. That being said, I think she probably had a lot of these things lined up. Maybe she didn't think they were ready enough to take public? Maybe Blanche wants to make a splash quickly?

Same here. But I wonder if the plan all along was to start with Bondi and move on to Blanche who may have experienced more scrutiny and resistance if he was the initial choice.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
After Comey destroyed Hillary's candidacy and covered up the valid investigation into Trump, being indicted by Trump is the best thing for his legacy
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Is the DOJ officially cooking?

Today is like MAGA Thanksgiving.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And then the cases will be tossed, so flimsy
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

After Comey destroyed Hillary's candidacy and covered up the valid investigation into Trump, being indicted by Trump is the best thing for his legacy

LOLOLOLOL at the BS cope
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

movielover said:

Is the DOJ officially cooking?




Tough call. She allegedly blocked the hiring of Joe diGenova in Trump Term 2.0, who said legal work had been done to line up evidence to hit the ground running on Day 1. Tough for an AG to deal w a JD type - can he stay out of the limelight and work the case?

BearlySane88 - Bondi seems like a complete joke, so why did Trump (Wiles) hire her? (Bondi and Wiles previously worked together in FLA.)

- rolled out Epstein "Files" with a couple of hundred pages, which were already released. What a joke.
- Conservative Social Media goons bought it
- hired no dynamite attorneys
- had an unqualified real estate attorney file charges against Comey
- rumors she worked from Florida (boyfriend lives there)
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

After Comey destroyed Hillary's candidacy and covered up the valid investigation into Trump, being indicted by Trump is the best thing for his legacy


RussiaGate covered up SpyGate. It's one continuum. Same attorneys, players, Clinton exonerated with flimsy flam, Trump targeted, Russia hoax, server hoax, phone call hoax, impeachment hoaxes. But what other individual could withstand that pressure and financial strain? Then crooked presecutions in DC and NY.

Internet rumors now claiming EJ Carrol got $10 million to go after President Trump, plus book and civil penalties?
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seashells, now a matter of state.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wow!!!
Moderation Censorship is alive and on duty here!
Well, apparently it's out of FEAR of being prosecuted, because this Comey 8647 story is…well…just plain ridiculous.
Allow me to explain!

In reading the News this morning, I posted a photo of Comey's "86-47" seashells Instagram post, and then I added an explanation of it.

Comey has been indicted by Trump's justice department, which I completely view as harrassment of the first degree.

I came here again this morning to add that he's going to turn himself in, when I discovered that my post of just 90 minutes ago has been removed.

That seems insane to me!
But I guess it leads to 1 of 3 conclusions:

1. There is someone here at BI who likes Trump and doesn't want criticism posted. Nah, there's years of brutal criticism left untouched.

2. There is someone here who agrees with Trump's argument that 86-47 represents an expression of violence. Seriously???? I don't. To me, that's a call for 25th amendment. Or voting against him. Violence? Gimme a break. No.

3. There is somebody here who fears legal harassment from Trump. Jump from Comey to ABC re: Kimmel to the owners of this site. Well, if that's the case, then we definitely need to 86 #47. And mind you, 86 means get rid of, as in remove, as in oppose, resist, 25th amendment, and vote against him.

Now, I know you readers didn't get a chance to read my post, but which option do you think is most likely?

Maybe my post here will be deleted. Maybe I will be suspended for asking how this site functions.

My request has been to provide explanations of actions taken. Otherwise, we get this.

Well, anyways, here's the news update for this thread:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/former-fbi-director-james-comey-123100427.html
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

After Comey destroyed Hillary's candidacy and covered up the valid investigation into Trump, being indicted by Trump is the best thing for his legacy


Definitely a stooge move!!!
He will never live it down. He made planet Earth suffer!
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Comey is a dirty cop, an empty suit, and a DC dummy.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Where's the mug shot?

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Comey could get some love in the Big House.

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Second recent investigation against the empty-suit Comey.

Bloomberg is reporting another investigation against Comey for leaking classified documents to his friend and 'special government employee', Daniel Richman. The evidence is solid.

(Daniel Richman (cutout) is part of the Democrat Lawfare network and close friends with Benjamin Wittes.)

concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Justice Department not only has hung this banner, but they are now renaming themselves to the Trump Harassment Headquarters.

Thus, the investigations and charges into Comey.

Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Comey could get some love in the Big House.


Movielover speculates without consequence about prisoners getting raped while others get suspended for far less disgusting posts.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Men w college degrees, especially knowledge of the law, often get appreciation and protection for their unique skill sets. They can help w strategy, briefs, etc.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

movielover said:

Comey could get some love in the Big House.


Movielover speculates without consequence about prisoners getting raped while others get suspended for far less disgusting posts.


Where did he say anything about anyone getting raped?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Are you really that naive?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Are you really that naive?


He didn't say rape and Movie even explained it later…

So this reasoning only works with the left claiming 86-47 didn't mean kill the president?
calpoly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Are you really that naive?

You have to ask?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I read something this morning where they are trying to tack on other unannounced threats that Comey has made, and the jury will hear it when they are in trial.

This is such a load of BS.
I can't believe republicans stand by our Adolph.

Anyone who supports this harassment effort, please tell me so I can spit in your direction.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
But Tom, we weren't given the satisfaction of seeing Comey's mugshot.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Comey will get the last laugh again. He always seems to.

Choose Kindness
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

But Tom, we weren't given the satisfaction of seeing Comey's mugshot.


Trump believes any publicity is good publicity. He doesn't want to give Comey any attention. Only the harassment
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.