Cheeto's smelly loss

635 Views | 3 Replies | Last: 29 days ago by concordtom
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/e-jean-carroll-my-83m-victory-over-smelly-trump/

Not Presidential at all!

I don't like my Presidents to be sexual assaulters/rapists

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
His courtroom antics as outlined in the article is a preview of how he will act on the witness stand in every case he is having his personal DOJ prosecute against his political enemies.

Each defendant in those actions will allege as part of their defense that the cases were vindictively filed at Trump's direction (in many cases, after he was told by DOJ prosecutors that the case was without merit).

Trump will be subpoenaed by the defense attorney to appear as a witness at trial. For that reason, alone, the cases will never see the light of a courtroom. In any event, the DOJ has no competent trial attorneys willing to handle those cases.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Trump has launched another harassment lawsuit against an opponent. This time it's E Jean Carroll.


The investigation is focused on whether Carroll committed perjury in testimony tied to her two civil lawsuits against the president one alleging he sexually abused Carroll in a New York department store in the mid-1990s, and a second for defaming her when in 2019 he repeatedly denied the assault, said she wasn't his type and claimed she made it up to boost sales of a book.

Prosecutors' theory hinges on a 2022 deposition statement by Carroll, 82, that she received no outside funding for her lawsuit, though it was later revealed that billionaire Reid Hoffman had paid some legal fees and expenses.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/exclusive-justice-department-launches-criminal-001028225.html

Critics often describe many of these cases as "SLAPP"-style litigation (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation), meaning lawsuits aimed partly at burdening opponents with legal costs or public pressure. Trump and his allies generally argue the suits are legitimate responses to defamation, bias, unlawful investigations, or political targeting.


A fully exhaustive list would be difficult because Donald Trump and Trump-affiliated entities have filed, threatened, or supported hundreds of lawsuits over decades business disputes, media fights, election litigation, NDAs, defamation claims, and political investigations. But if you mean the broader pattern of lawsuits or legal actions against critics, investigators, former officials, media figures, and political opponents, the list includes many more names:

Former officials / investigators

* James Comey
* John Brennan
* Andrew McCabe
* Peter Strzok
* Lisa Page
* Norm Eisen
* Mark Pomerantz
* Michael Fanone (threatened litigation rhetoric/public targeting)

Prosecutors and attorneys general

* Letitia James
* Alvin Bragg
* Fani Willis
* Jack Smith
* E. Jean Carroll (countersuits and repeated litigation)

Political opponents

* Hillary Clinton
* Barack Obama (public threats/litigation rhetoric)
* Joe Biden (campaign/election litigation context)
* Kamala Harris
* Adam Schiff
* Nancy Pelosi
* Liz Cheney
* Bennie Thompson

Former allies turned critics

* Michael Cohen
* Omarosa Manigault Newman
* John Bolton
* Stephanie Grisham
* Miles Taylor
* Mary L. Trump

Media organizations and journalists

* CNN
* The New York Times
* The Washington Post
* ABC News
* CBS
* Meta
* Twitter
* YouTube
* George Stephanopoulos
* Bob Woodward

Institutions / organizations

* Pulitzer Prize Board
* Democratic National Committee
* House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack

There are also many election-related lawsuits against states, counties, election boards, and individual election workers after the 2020 election.

Whether these are viewed as legitimate legal defenses or politically motivated harassment depends heavily on perspective. Courts have dismissed a significant number of Trump's high-profile political lawsuits, sometimes with judges criticizing the legal theories involved, while some cases have resulted in settlements or partial victories for Trump.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.