BearlySane88 said:

---

I support independent journalists that's don't force people to pay for their content and aren't set to a guideline of what they can write by a parent company.

---

I was right the first time.
You want journalists to give their work away for FREE.

DiabloWags said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I support independent journalists that's don't force people to pay for their content and aren't set to a guideline of what they can write by a parent company.

---

I was right the first time.
You want journalists to give their work away for FREE.

---

I've been saying that this whole time.

I don't know of anyone who is able to pay their mortgage by working for FREE.

When I was a contributing reporter here at BEARINSIDER I was paid by Chris Avery 5 cents a word.

Barely made enough money for a Top Dog.

DiabloWags said:

---

I don't know of anyone who is able to pay their mortgage by working for FREE.

When I was a contributing reporter here at BEARINSIDER I was paid by Chris Avery 5 cents a word.

Barely made enough money for a Top Dog.

---

Congrats?

DiabloWags said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

I've been subscribing to the print edition of the WSJ for decades. I strongly recommend it for those that don't understand how tariffs work.

---

I agree. Some folks may need to brush up on their reading comprehension skills first though.

---

I've noticed that no one here appears to subscribe to the WSJ, so your introductory subscription link will most likely fall on deaf ears. People here seem to find tweets from anonymous X accounts more credible.

Weird.

---

Shocking that people don't trust main stream media. Can't possibly guess why that might be…

---

What's shocking is your comment above. You've obviously never read the Wall Street Journal.

I pay $780 a year for it and I learn something new every single day.

And FWIW, it probably has one of the most conservative opinion sections on the planet.

I'll just leave it at that.

---

Had a subscription for years and have entirely turned myself off of main stream media. It's all biased and driven by money, hence you having to pay $780 a year for it.

---

Some of my best trading ideas have been inspired from reading the WSJ. But Im not surprised you're unable to grasp that and that's why you highlight the $780 price.

That makes no sense to me.
$780 is peanuts.

You're missing the point.

---

I don't know why you bother engaging with certain people.

DiabloWags said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

So how is the WSJ biased because of a money grab?
Explain that to me.

---

Placing so much content behind a paywall can influence what gets published or emphasized, focusing on content that attracts paying readers rather than what might be most informative to a general audience.

---

So you think journalists should work for free?
That makes zero sense.

Again, it doesnt sound like you've ever read the WSJ.

---

man, hard to jump in here when they are digging holes for themselves. 1 company named benefits from the tariff, admit most don't , don't read the WSJ, repost randos constantly, bash the wsj that they don't subscribe to and complain about $780. Lolz is right! Go Bears!

cal83dls79 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

So how is the WSJ biased because of a money grab?
Explain that to me.

---

Placing so much content behind a paywall can influence what gets published or emphasized, focusing on content that attracts paying readers rather than what might be most informative to a general audience.

---

So you think journalists should work for free?
That makes zero sense.

Again, it doesnt sound like you've ever read the WSJ.

---

man, hard to jump in here when they are digging holes for themselves. 1 company named benefits from the tariff, admit most don't , don't read the WSJ, repost randos constantly, bash the wsj that they don't subscribe to and complain about $780. Lolz is right! Go Bears!

---

"Randos" are the new WSJ and for free. Mainstream media is dead

cal83dls79 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

So how is the WSJ biased because of a money grab?
Explain that to me.

---

Placing so much content behind a paywall can influence what gets published or emphasized, focusing on content that attracts paying readers rather than what might be most informative to a general audience.

---

So you think journalists should work for free?
That makes zero sense.

Again, it doesnt sound like you've ever read the WSJ.

---

man, hard to jump in here when they are digging holes for themselves. 1 company named benefits from the tariff, admit most don't , don't read the WSJ, repost randos constantly, bash the wsj that they don't subscribe to and complain about $780. Lolz is right! Go Bears!

---

So much for educating and teaching about the ECONOMY.

I'm convinced that there are people in life that are incapable of learning.
They have everything figured out.

I'd hate to see them put money into the financial markets.
They'd have a difficult time keeping their ego in check and admitting that they're wrong.
Being wrong with money at risk can be very humbling and PAINFUL.

If you can't ask the question, "What am I missing"?
You're not going to last very long.

I love being around people that are smarter than me.
You get to learn new things and see things from a deeper perspective.

One of my favorite economic journalists is Joseph Sternberg at the WSJ
Here's his latest from this weekend's WSJ.

Enjoy the free link!

https://www.wsj.com/opinion/hurrah-europe-is-fighting-over-economic-policy-fdf27fee?st=kUDEQD&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

DiabloWags said:

---

Don't worry . . . all of the Bitcoin Bros got out at $440.
lol

---

If you plan on dying in the next two years, bro, it's better to hold your money in cash or other low risk, less volatile assets.

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

Don't worry . . . all of the Bitcoin Bros got out at $440.
lol

---

If you plan on dying in the next two years, bro, it's better to hold your money in cash or other low risk, less volatile assets.

---

Are you predicting Trump dies in the next two years?

concordtom said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

Don't worry . . . all of the Bitcoin Bros got out at $440.
lol

---

If you plan on dying in the next two years, bro, it's better to hold your money in cash or other low risk, less volatile assets.

---

Are you predicting Trump dies in the next two years?

---

Nope. Trump will never die just to spite you

When Trump dies, I will fly to wherever he's buried and give him a nice Golden Shower.

And I'll post it on You Tube.
Count on it.

DiabloWags said:

---

When Trump dies, I will fly to wherever he's buried and give him a nice Golden Shower.

And I'll post it on You Tube.
Count on it.

---

Why do you talk about golden showers so often?

Perfect example of TDS

Speaking of which, where is Kirk's gravesite? I want to visit after slamming a sixer

SBGold said:

---

Speaking of which, where is Kirk's gravesite? I want to visit after slamming a sixer

---

What kind of grown man talks about pissing on a dead persons grave?

Is that wrong? Should I have not done that?

Does Kirk have a legacy that anyone should respect?

ICE OUT

SBGold said:

---

Is that wrong? Should I have not done that?

Does Kirk have a legacy that anyone should respect?

ICE OUT

---

Just strange for a grown man to be thinking about doing that. His legacy is whatever you want it to be but you don't respect yourself when saying stuff like this

SBGold said:

---

Where do you think Melania will be buried?

ICE OUT

---

On the 3rd hole at Bedminster?

SBGold said:

---

Where do you think Melania will be buried?

ICE OUT

---

Who cares?

lol, DIRT BUIDDIES WITH IVANKA

SBGold said:

---

I'd like to know, that would be another trip for me

---

Weird story for a grown man. Also a crime if you actually did it, especially weird since you say you're a judge

SBGold said:

---

I'd like to know, that would be another trip for me

---

I haven't been in Jersey since my first tour in NYC back in the early 90's.

When I interviewed with my first boss (Victor Sperandeo) I flew out to NJ and spent time with one of my best buddies from Cal, who was a bio-chem major from Cornell and lived in Essex Fells, NJ.

He was born in Basil, Switzerland the son of a chemist and a dentist.
Dude was like a brother to me during my final year at Cal.

George came out to CAL for one year because he wanted to be closer to his GF who was on the swim team at UOP. We lived at the same house on the corner of Channing and Piedmont, across from the A-Di-Pi house and next door to the Chi Omega sorority. Dude drove a beautiful blue 912 Porsche from the 70s and was an excellent skier.

His Dad had become the Chairman of Sandoz, the Swiss Pharma Company.
He had actually synthesized LSD with Hoffman, of Hoffman-LaRoche.

In any event, while I was staying with George during that Summer of 1983, his Dad was sequestered in the back of their home undergoing treatment for a very aggressive stomach cancer. He died just 3-months later.

His son George went on to become a noted orthopedic spine surgeon in Denver.
Got his medical training at Georgetown and did his residency at St. Luke's in Chicago.

In 2012, he was selected as one of the most influential and important American spine surgeons in the Beckers list of 207 Spine Surgeons and Specialists to Know.

The people you meet at CAL.