oski003 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
oski003 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
DiabloWags said:
Anarchistbear said:
Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Mr. Kent "has aligned himself with political violence, promoted falsehoods that undermine our democracy and tried to twist intelligence to serve a political agenda."
Now he's a hero of the resistance
Yes.
Because he was one of "them" and simply parroted everything that the far-right did.
He even received a campaign endorsement from Nick Fuentes.
And now he's seen Jesus.
Jan. 6 Conspiracy Theorist Who Likened BLM to Terrorists to Lead Counterterrorism Center | Truthout
We don't support Nick Fuentes. He's a troll and has no aspirations for anything but himself
It's cute when you refer to yourself in the third person.
I can only imagine who you are referring to since I have them blocked.
Did they deflect from the topic at hand which is JOE KENT?
Trump said today that KENT was "weak on security, very weak on security."
SO WHY WOULD TRUMP NOMINATE HIM?
"I didn't know him well, but I thought he seemed like a pretty nice guy," Trump said.
Kent's resignation sparks Trump and Leavitt backlash
No, they didn't. Their post was fine, and EOB went with an unnecessary personal attack.
Hey, cut it out with the personal attacks. You're lucky I'm not a snowflake.
Seriously, when your definition of personal attack becomes so broad and all encompassing, it loses it's meaning for actual personal attacks. Reading something you don't like isn't a personal attack.
No EOB. There was nothing broad about my definition of a personal attack here, and I read tons of stuff I don't like. You clearly attacked Bearlysane88 for no reason whatsoever, other than to call him a troll with no aspirations. Of course Diablo jumped on because that is his M.O. Please, cut it out.
I'd tell you to keep on doing you, but I wouldn't want to be accused of a personal attack.
I'm not sure how pointing out that he referred to himself in the third person becomes calling him a troll with no aspirations, but maybe you know BearlySane88 better than I do. I certainly wasn't implying any of that.
Well that post did get removed so obviously Oski wasn't the only one who felt that way
I guess I see now who is running the asylum around here.
Trump has made a lot of folks so angry that they are no longer objective. Perhaps you didn't write what you meant to say, but it clearly read as what I posted.
You know, by recent Off Topic standards, you just made a personal attack, but I'm not going to run to the moderators about it.
I didn't say anything about Trump or was even thinking about Trump, so maybe you're not being objective. BearlySane88 said "We don't support Nick Fuentes." That was all I was commenting about. Not his other sentence and not what was said in earlier posts. I don't even know much about Nick Fuentes.
His statement can be taken two ways: 1) BearlySane88 purports to speak for a group of people (not sure that's true) or 2) He's referring to himself in the third person. I chose to make a light hearted quip about #2. If a gentle comment meant in jest is too strong to be allowed in Off Topic, well that's an eye opener.