dajo9 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

You guys do realize that Iran is attacking civilian ships and holding us hostage by threatening to continue doing so, right? Given that we don't have an easy way to protect these ships, perhaps we should start hurting them economically by taking out their infrastructure. Assuming that the U.S. was justified in its initial attack on Iran, is it wrong to attack their infrastructure, given the circumstances?

---

Yes, its wrong. When you punch somebody and they punch you back, it is wrong to punch them again.

---

Cal88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

You guys do realize that Iran is attacking civilian ships and holding us hostage by threatening to continue doing so, right? Given that we don't have an easy way to protect these ships, perhaps we should start hurting them economically by taking out their infrastructure. Assuming that the U.S. was justified in its initial attack on Iran, is it wrong to attack their infrastructure, given the circumstances?

---

You bomb Iran to the stone age, they bomb the GCC's entire infrastructure and destroy the world's economy. They'll go down slinging, and why shouldn't they. You think we can bomb them into submission because you are clueless about the facts on the ground, and Iran's capabilities, and Trump's gatekeepers have purged all military realists/dissenters leaving the crazed ideologues and sellouts.

This whole thing is a sham, a war of choice imposed on Trump by Israel and its people in his administration, Kushner, Wiles, Witcoff etc. The Iranians offered to get rid of their nuclear program and enriched uranium stockpile in exchange for peace and normalization, Bibi scuttled that deal and killed off the Iranian leadership. Everytime there is progress in negotiations, the Israelis kill whoever was leading the process on the Iranian side.

---

dajo9 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

You guys do realize that Iran is attacking civilian ships and holding us hostage by threatening to continue doing so, right? Given that we don't have an easy way to protect these ships, perhaps we should start hurting them economically by taking out their infrastructure. Assuming that the U.S. was justified in its initial attack on Iran, is it wrong to attack their infrastructure, given the circumstances?

---

You bomb Iran to the stone age, they bomb the GCC's entire infrastructure and destroy the world's economy. They'll go down slinging, and why shouldn't they. You think we can bomb them into submission because you are clueless about the facts on the ground, and Iran's capabilities, and Trump's gatekeepers have purged all military realists/dissenters leaving the crazed ideologues and sellouts.

This whole thing is a sham, a war of choice imposed on Trump by Israel and its people in his administration, Kushner, Wiles, Witcoff etc. The Iranians offered to get rid of their nuclear program and enriched uranium stockpile in exchange for peace and normalization, Bibi scuttled that deal and killed off the Iranian leadership. Everytime there is progress in negotiations, the Israelis kill whoever was leading the process on the Iranian side.

---

There are a ton of rational thinkers who have been in the government over the past 20+ years who were all worried about Iran and the missiles and drones they are building and giving to their terrorist proxies across the Middle East all while chanting death to America and Israel. That is why I simply asked, assuming we were justified to attack militarily, if is it okay to now target non-military infrastructure given that they are attacking civilian targets of our allies and friends.

---

We destroyed a girls school on the first day of bombing. The premise you are trying to build is flawed beyond recognition.

---

Cal88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

You guys do realize that Iran is attacking civilian ships and holding us hostage by threatening to continue doing so, right? Given that we don't have an easy way to protect these ships, perhaps we should start hurting them economically by taking out their infrastructure. Assuming that the U.S. was justified in its initial attack on Iran, is it wrong to attack their infrastructure, given the circumstances?

---

You bomb Iran to the stone age, they bomb the GCC's entire infrastructure and destroy the world's economy. They'll go down slinging, and why shouldn't they. You think we can bomb them into submission because you are clueless about the facts on the ground, and Iran's capabilities, and Trump's gatekeepers have purged all military realists/dissenters leaving the crazed ideologues and sellouts.

This whole thing is a sham, a war of choice imposed on Trump by Israel and its people in his administration, Kushner, Wiles, Witcoff etc. The Iranians offered to get rid of their nuclear program and enriched uranium stockpile in exchange for peace and normalization, Bibi scuttled that deal and killed off the Iranian leadership. Everytime there is progress in negotiations, the Israelis kill whoever was leading the process on the Iranian side.

---

There are a ton of rational thinkers who have been in the government over the past 20+ years who were all worried about Iran and the missiles and drones they are building and giving to their terrorist proxies across the Middle East all while chanting death to America and Israel. That is why I simply asked, assuming we were justified to attack militarily, if is it okay to now target non-military infrastructure given that they are attacking civilian targets of our allies and friends.

---

The rational thinkers thought this out and came up with the JCPOA.

Trump was paid $200 million by Sheldon and Miriam to scrap it, and he delivered.

We had a better version of this on the table last month, the Israelis made sure it never happened.

---

Aunburdened said:

---

oski003 said:

---

You guys do realize that Iran is attacking civilian ships and holding us hostage by threatening to continue doing so, right? Given that we don't have an easy way to protect these ships, perhaps we should start hurting them economically by taking out their infrastructure. Assuming that the U.S. was justified in its initial attack on Iran, is it wrong to attack their infrastructure, given the circumstances?

---

Your whole argument breaks down in the bolded part

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

One thing that our Israeli backers keep emphasizing to us is that war makes its own rules.. works both ways.

---

Aunburdened said:

---

oski003 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

You guys do realize that Iran is attacking civilian ships and holding us hostage by threatening to continue doing so, right? Given that we don't have an easy way to protect these ships, perhaps we should start hurting them economically by taking out their infrastructure. Assuming that the U.S. was justified in its initial attack on Iran, is it wrong to attack their infrastructure, given the circumstances?

---

You bomb Iran to the stone age, they bomb the GCC's entire infrastructure and destroy the world's economy. They'll go down slinging, and why shouldn't they. You think we can bomb them into submission because you are clueless about the facts on the ground, and Iran's capabilities, and Trump's gatekeepers have purged all military realists/dissenters leaving the crazed ideologues and sellouts.

This whole thing is a sham, a war of choice imposed on Trump by Israel and its people in his administration, Kushner, Wiles, Witcoff etc. The Iranians offered to get rid of their nuclear program and enriched uranium stockpile in exchange for peace and normalization, Bibi scuttled that deal and killed off the Iranian leadership. Everytime there is progress in negotiations, the Israelis kill whoever was leading the process on the Iranian side.

---

There are a ton of rational thinkers who have been in the government over the past 20+ years who were all worried about Iran and the missiles and drones they are building and giving to their terrorist proxies across the Middle East all while chanting death to America and Israel. That is why I simply asked, assuming we were justified to attack militarily, if is it okay to now target non-military infrastructure given that they are attacking civilian targets of our allies and friends.

---

We destroyed a girls school on the first day of bombing. The premise you are trying to build is flawed beyond recognition.

---

By mistake.

---

On purpose

---

Aunburdened said:

---

oski003 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

oski003 said:

---

You guys do realize that Iran is attacking civilian ships and holding us hostage by threatening to continue doing so, right? Given that we don't have an easy way to protect these ships, perhaps we should start hurting them economically by taking out their infrastructure. Assuming that the U.S. was justified in its initial attack on Iran, is it wrong to attack their infrastructure, given the circumstances?

---

Your whole argument breaks down in the bolded part

---

No, it does not.

---

Yes it does.

I'm going to continue deleting all your ****ing pathetic excuses for why this war makes sense in my responses cause I'm tired of dumb****s dominating the conversation.

---

oski003 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

You guys do realize that Iran is attacking civilian ships and holding us hostage by threatening to continue doing so, right? Given that we don't have an easy way to protect these ships, perhaps we should start hurting them economically by taking out their infrastructure. Assuming that the U.S. was justified in its initial attack on Iran, is it wrong to attack their infrastructure, given the circumstances?

---

You bomb Iran to the stone age, they bomb the GCC's entire infrastructure and destroy the world's economy. They'll go down slinging, and why shouldn't they. You think we can bomb them into submission because you are clueless about the facts on the ground, and Iran's capabilities, and Trump's gatekeepers have purged all military realists/dissenters leaving the crazed ideologues and sellouts.

This whole thing is a sham, a war of choice imposed on Trump by Israel and its people in his administration, Kushner, Wiles, Witcoff etc. The Iranians offered to get rid of their nuclear program and enriched uranium stockpile in exchange for peace and normalization, Bibi scuttled that deal and killed off the Iranian leadership. Everytime there is progress in negotiations, the Israelis kill whoever was leading the process on the Iranian side.

---

There are a ton of rational thinkers who have been in the government over the past 20+ years who were all worried about Iran and the missiles and drones they are building and giving to their terrorist proxies across the Middle East all while chanting death to America and Israel. That is why I simply asked, assuming we were justified to attack militarily, if is it okay to now target non-military infrastructure given that they are attacking civilian targets of our allies and friends.

---

We destroyed a girls school on the first day of bombing. The premise you are trying to build is flawed beyond recognition.

---

By mistake. It was also next to multiple IRGC compounds. I believe it was previously used by IRGC until they turned it into a school.

---

A first look at an apparent tungsten pellet from the U.S. strikes on Lamerd, Feb. 28. PrSM is designed to detonate above target and disperse thousands of these pellets outward. Our analysis shows they killed at least 21 people, including girls who were at volleyball practice. pic.twitter.com/ADBtYVdXJ7

— Christiaan Triebert (@trbrtc) March 31, 2026

Prominent war correspondent exposes the Pentagon for testing experimental PRISM missiles packed with tungsten pellets on an Iranian elementary school and sports complex. Washington is literally using children as test subjects for their deadly weapons. Absolute war crime. pic.twitter.com/i1uPFEOCPD

— Furkan Gözükara (@FurkanGozukara) March 31, 2026

Aunburdened said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

oski003 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

oski003 said:

---

You guys do realize that Iran is attacking civilian ships and holding us hostage by threatening to continue doing so, right? Given that we don't have an easy way to protect these ships, perhaps we should start hurting them economically by taking out their infrastructure. Assuming that the U.S. was justified in its initial attack on Iran, is it wrong to attack their infrastructure, given the circumstances?

---

Your whole argument breaks down in the bolded part

---

No, it does not.

---

Yes it does.

I'm going to continue deleting all your ****ing pathetic excuses for why this war makes sense in my responses cause I'm tired of dumb****s dominating the conversation.

---

I would suggest using the IGNORE feature.

---

I would suggest you STFU

---