^Javier is based!

TDS is so powerful that Greta is now in favor of increased oil consumption…🤣🤣 https://t.co/g5FNsxIp0o

— Kuppy (@hkuppy) March 15, 2026

Lots of Independents are conservative, and are tired of being branded a 'racist' by the Progressive drones. Either way it doesn't matter, the UniParty and Globalists have a lock on most everything. They can't even move the 85% issue SAVE America voting bill.

MORE WINNING!





US judge blocks efforts to reshape childhood vaccine policy

DiabloWags said:

---

MORE WINNING!





US judge blocks efforts to reshape childhood vaccine policy

---

I don't agree with the push to reduce childhood vaccinations. However, the article fails to provide the Biden judge's legal basis to block these moves. Why is this new policy illegal?

Alito and Thomas are very concerned about the welfare of children. They will set things right after they accept the matter for review.

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

MORE WINNING!





US judge blocks efforts to reshape childhood vaccine policy

---

I don't agree with the push to reduce childhood vaccinations. However, the article fails to provide the Biden judge's legal basis to block these moves. Why is this new policy illegal?

---

I will leave it up to you to ask Ai that question.
Thanks.

DiabloWags said:

---

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

MORE WINNING!





US judge blocks efforts to reshape childhood vaccine policy

---

I don't agree with the push to reduce childhood vaccinations. However, the article fails to provide the Biden judge's legal basis to block these moves. Why is this new policy illegal?

---

I will leave it up to you to ask Ai that question.
Thanks.

---

You respond like a baby when someone asks a legitimate question. Grow up.

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

MORE WINNING!





US judge blocks efforts to reshape childhood vaccine policy

---

I don't agree with the push to reduce childhood vaccinations. However, the article fails to provide the Biden judge's legal basis to block these moves. Why is this new policy illegal?

---

I will leave it up to you to ask Ai that question.
Thanks.

---

You respond like a baby when someone asks a legitimate question. Grow up.

---

I'm not interested in what you have to say because you're not interested in a good-faith discussion.

You made that clear over the weekend when you failed to address how moving ships thru the Strait would provide more insight.

I'm going to put you on ignore for the rest of the year.
You'll have to find someone else to follow around and spend 60% of your posts replying to.

Perhaps I will do the same with your buddy BarelySane.
Thanks.

DiabloWags said:

---

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

MORE WINNING!





US judge blocks efforts to reshape childhood vaccine policy

---

I don't agree with the push to reduce childhood vaccinations. However, the article fails to provide the Biden judge's legal basis to block these moves. Why is this new policy illegal?

---

I will leave it up to you to ask Ai that question.
Thanks.

---

You respond like a baby when someone asks a legitimate question. Grow up.

---

I'm not interested in what you have to say because you're not interested in a good-faith discussion.

You made that clear over the weekend when you failed to address how moving ships thru the Strait would provide more insight.

I'm going to put you on ignore for the rest of the year.
You'll have to find someone else to follow around and spend 60% of your posts replying to.

Perhaps I will do the same with your buddy BarelySane.
Thanks.

---

Then why respond to him at all?

You once again just did what you accuse others of doing. Remember that "essay" that Beargoggles wrote.

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

MORE WINNING!





US judge blocks efforts to reshape childhood vaccine policy

---

I don't agree with the push to reduce childhood vaccinations. However, the article fails to provide the Biden judge's legal basis to block these moves. Why is this new policy illegal?

---

I will leave it up to you to ask Ai that question.
Thanks.

---

You respond like a baby when someone asks a legitimate question. Grow up.

---

I'm not interested in what you have to say because you're not interested in a good-faith discussion.

You made that clear over the weekend when you failed to address how moving ships thru the Strait would provide more insight.

I'm going to put you on ignore for the rest of the year.
You'll have to find someone else to follow around and spend 60% of your posts replying to.

Perhaps I will do the same with your buddy BarelySane.
Thanks.

---

Then why respond to him at all?

You once again just did what you accuse others of doing. Remember that "essay" that Beargoggles wrote.

---

I just notified BearGreg that I'm putting you and our mascot on IGNORE for the rest of the year because I'm tired of the constant deflection, lack of good-faith posting, and trolling.

It's also clear that I'm not the only one that feels this way.
Many other posters here have complained of the same.

Perhaps you should stop for a moment and recall how I asked you a number of questions about where you thought interest rates, inflation, inflation, and stock prices would be. You didn't answer the questions. You started talking about a partner of yours that is a stockbroker which made no sense. You deflected.

You'll have to find someone else to follow around and engage with.
It won't be me.

Enjoy!

DiabloWags said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

MORE WINNING!





US judge blocks efforts to reshape childhood vaccine policy

---

I don't agree with the push to reduce childhood vaccinations. However, the article fails to provide the Biden judge's legal basis to block these moves. Why is this new policy illegal?

---

I will leave it up to you to ask Ai that question.
Thanks.

---

You respond like a baby when someone asks a legitimate question. Grow up.

---

I'm not interested in what you have to say because you're not interested in a good-faith discussion.

You made that clear over the weekend when you failed to address how moving ships thru the Strait would provide more insight.

I'm going to put you on ignore for the rest of the year.
You'll have to find someone else to follow around and spend 60% of your posts replying to.

Perhaps I will do the same with your buddy BarelySane.
Thanks.

---

Then why respond to him at all?

You once again just did what you accuse others of doing. Remember that "essay" that Beargoggles wrote.

---

I just notified BearGreg that I'm putting you and our mascot on IGNORE for the rest of the year because I'm tired of the constant deflection, lack of good-faith posting, and trolling.

Enjoy!

---

Thank god. Still waiting for the 5k donation to Cal football though since you lost the bet. Good thing I don't care what posters on an Internet forum think of me, clearly you do because you can't stand the heat when applied and then go whine about it incessantly.

lol why would you message BearGreg to say that? That's a wonderful waste of your time and his. Maybe he won't have time to read the "essay" you wrote him

Final face off before the lunch delivery pic.twitter.com/OKXE6SVhj7

— rudy koski (@KoskionFOX7) March 16, 2026

Eric Swalwell is actually dumber than he portrays. pic.twitter.com/EvEWU47jxC

— Clyp Keeper (@DGrayTexas45) March 16, 2026

DiabloWags said:

---

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

MORE WINNING!





US judge blocks efforts to reshape childhood vaccine policy

---

I don't agree with the push to reduce childhood vaccinations. However, the article fails to provide the Biden judge's legal basis to block these moves. Why is this new policy illegal?

---

I will leave it up to you to ask Ai that question.
Thanks.

---

You respond like a baby when someone asks a legitimate question. Grow up.

---

I'm not interested in what you have to say because you're not interested in a good-faith discussion.

You made that clear over the weekend when you failed to address how moving ships thru the Strait would provide more insight.

I'm going to put you on ignore for the rest of the year.
You'll have to find someone else to follow around and spend 60% of your posts replying to.

Perhaps I will do the same with your buddy BarelySane.
Thanks.

---

Just because things fly over your head, it doesn't mean the other poster is not interested in good faith discussion. YOU HAVE LITERALLY BEEN CAUGHT LYING THREE SEPARATE TIMES IN LESS THAN A WEEK. As for encouraging ships to go through, it is common sense that if, you see how someone attacks, it is easier to defend against said future attacks. Obviously, there are negatives as well but it is certainly okay to objectively ponder that seeing something enter a trap will help us figure out how to beat it.

The best part might be that I know he's gonna read everything posted by you and I and now he can't respond or he looks like he's going back on what he said he's doing.

JKS brand launch is off the hook! Go Bears! pic.twitter.com/QzfSeRYpkX

— Chris Haddawy (@chrishaddawy) March 16, 2026

Not really off topic but so cool seeing the Cal community embracing their own

🚨 BREAKING: An investigation into Gavin Newsom’s California has been launched following a video of people being PAID to sign other voters’ names on political campaign petitions

ANOTHER reason the SAVE America Act must be passed NOW before the 2026 election

NUKE THE FILIBUSTER… pic.twitter.com/0BCJnUEZ5U

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) March 16, 2026

Posted this a week ago but good to see they are investigating it

bearister said:

---

oski003 said:

---

However, the article fails to provide the Biden judge's legal basis to block these moves. Why is this new policy illegal?

---

"A federal judge temporarily blocked efforts to reduce recommended childhood vaccines, citing that the Health Secretary likely violated federal procedures, specifically regarding the restructuring of a key vaccine advisory committee. The court found that these changes failed to follow established administrative processes required for altering public health guidelines."
PBS

---

How many times can Judge Murphy get reversed in one year? The same day he is stayed for repeatedly refusing to follow the law, he issues another activist decision. We will keep appealing these lawless decisions, and we will keep winning. The question is, how much embarrassment… https://t.co/5jNFUKLFjK

— Todd Blanche (@DAGToddBlanche) March 16, 2026

BREAKING: President Trump asks if Venezuela should be the 51st state. pic.twitter.com/WyjP2rT8Co

— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) March 17, 2026

Venezuela 51 and Cuba 52 sound good

BearlySane88 said:

---

How many times can Judge Murphy get reversed in one year? The same day he is stayed for repeatedly refusing to follow the law, he issues another activist decision. We will keep appealing these lawless decisions, and we will keep winning. The question is, how much embarrassment… https://t.co/5jNFUKLFjK

— Todd Blanche (@DAGToddBlanche) March 16, 2026

---

Todd Blanche will be very lucky if he doesn't join the ranks of attorneys in Trump's orbit that lose their law licenses at the end of the reign.

"As of early 2026, Todd Blanche, serving as U.S. Deputy Attorney General, faced allegations of serious ethical violations. A Campaign Legal Center complaint filed in January 2026 alleged he held significant crypto-related assets while directing the Department of Justice to pause crypto prosecutions.
ProPublica

Key details regarding the allegations include:

Crypto Conflict of Interest: The complaint alleges that Blanche violated, or potentially violated, conflict-of-interest laws and his ethics agreement by directing the DOJ to halt investigations into crypto companies while personally owning thousands in crypto-related assets (e.g., Bitcoin and Ethereum).

Asset Transfer Concerns: Records show that while Blanche eventually divested from some crypto interests, he transferred them to his adult children and a grandchild. Ethics experts noted this maneuver, while perhaps technically legal, likely violated the spirit of the law regarding appearances of improper influence.

"Ending Regulation" Memo: On April 7, 2025, Blanche issued a memorandum titled "Ending Regulation by Prosecution," which ordered DOJ staff to cease certain enforcement actions against digital asset companies.

Other Potential Conflicts: During his confirmation hearing, concerns were raised regarding his oversight of cases he may have had prior involvement in, particularly the January 6th and Mar-a-Lago investigations, although he pledged not to violate ethical obligations.
NPR

The Campaign Legal Center has called for a formal investigation into these actions by the Justice Department's inspector general and the Office of Government Ethics."
Campaign Legal Center

I assume there will also be an investigation of his jailhouse "interview" of Ghislaine Maxwell and her subsequent transfer to another prison to determine if witness tampering occurred.