socaltownie said:CNHTH said:
Why is Dorsey playing let alone in crunch time in conference play?
Answer me that my hoops "experts" who I would absolutely expose at the rec and who never played a minute of hoops in their lives?
Who else? Our bench is really short
westcoast101 said:
No freaking way. Couldn't hit a shot for 5+ minutes and then hit those huge threes. Go Bears.
m2bear said:
ND has every right to be pissed.
That should never have been a continuation.
That being said... I hate ND and they deserved it!
Bwhahahahaha!
continuation is absolutely the rule now, and he was absolute trying to foul, but Ames was moving so fast he only got a light slap on him. The official was doing notre Dame a favor calling the foul despite the light tap. Had he not called it, the ND coach would have been livid for not getting the call before the 3 was hit. This coach has rubbed off on their players, especially 33. We deserved that win. It was the right call. They got it right (the third time). Go Bears!m2bear said:
ND has every right to be pissed.
That should never have been a continuation.
That being said... I hate ND and they deserved it!
Bwhahahahaha!
wait till they get snubbed by the tourney selection committee. lol.trueblue22 said:
Bench players just saved that coach his job. What an embarrassment for ND.
stu said:
ND lost at the FT line, making just 10 of 26. And we had only 3 TO.
The TV replay shows Ames being lightly pushed well before he jumped for the last shot. What's the rule covering continuation?
calumnus said:stu said:
ND lost at the FT line, making just 10 of 26. And we had only 3 TO.
The TV replay shows Ames being lightly pushed well before he jumped for the last shot. What's the rule covering continuation?
But the ref only calls a foul as Ames is going into his shooting motion.
stu said:calumnus said:stu said:
ND lost at the FT line, making just 10 of 26. And we had only 3 TO.
The TV replay shows Ames being lightly pushed well before he jumped for the last shot. What's the rule covering continuation?
But the ref only calls a foul as Ames is going into his shooting motion.
To me it looked like the foul was well before the shooting motion. I saw a light push, then Ames set his feet, then jumped, then released the shot. I'm not sure about what constitutes a shooting motion.
there was a grab and a foul that should have been called earlier in the play, but was not, then it was clear they were intentionally trying to foul so the lighter slap actually WAS called, and it was just as Ames was gathering to shoot. So he got the call. It was a missed call, but then the correct call, and then wrong to overturn, and right to overturn again.stu said:calumnus said:stu said:
ND lost at the FT line, making just 10 of 26. And we had only 3 TO.
The TV replay shows Ames being lightly pushed well before he jumped for the last shot. What's the rule covering continuation?
But the ref only calls a foul as Ames is going into his shooting motion.
To me it looked like the foul was well before the shooting motion. I saw a light push, then Ames set his feet, then jumped, then released the shot. I'm not sure about what constitutes a shooting motion.
oski003 said:m2bear said:
ND has every right to be pissed.
That should never have been a continuation.
That being said... I hate ND and they deserved it!
Bwhahahahaha!
He pushed his butt with his left hand as he was starting to go up for the shot. Definite continuation. The confusion is it looks like he was close to fouling him prior to that.
trueblue22 said:
Bench players just saved that coach his job. What an embarrassment for ND.
