This is a tournament team

5,079 Views | 43 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by Cal88
HairOfTheBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

blungld said:

It's crazy to me that with 64+ teams making the tournament you still have to be this good and it is still this hard to make it in.


There are something like 350 D1 teams


I really didn't have a good idea of how many Div 1 (361+4 teams transitioning up), Div 2 (292) and Div 3 teams (422) there are until I just looked. Over a thousand schools compete at those 3 div's. Wow.

Also, Nationally (not including California) there are only 157 National JC teams across 3 divisions. PLUS in California there another whopping 87 California Community College teams!!! That's only an average of a little more than 3 per state and then wow California.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

blungld said:

It's crazy to me that with 64+ teams making the tournament you still have to be this good and it is still this hard to make it in.


There are something like 350 D1 teams


It is huge. There are actually 365 D1 teams ranked in NET. Which is why it is crazy that Mark Fox coached us to the worst record and lowest scoring team out of 365 teams in the entire country. Only 3 wins. That was just nuts.

We are currently one game over .500 in conference and are in 8th place. We are ranked in the 50s or 60s and trying to get an at large spot in a 64 team tournament where half (?) the teams are automatic qualifiers. It is not crazy at all that we are a bubble team, but that we are one only three years after Fox had us at the very bottom is a thing of joy.
6956bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wifeisafurd said:

BeachedBear said:

wifeisafurd said:

blungld said:

It's crazy to me that with 64+ teams making the tournament you still have to be this good and it is still this hard to make it in.

Agreed, but there are a decent number of those 64 spots that are reserved for teams that meet certain criteria such as winning a lower division conference championship tourney. The reality is Cal and most other P4 and Big East schools are competing for fewer spaces than 64. The ACC has the no. 1 team and a few top 25 teams, but has a lot of good, but not great teams like Cal. Tough overall conference. The Big 12 and Big 10 have been 1 and 2 in RPI with the SEC and ACC taking turns on the next two spots, and the Big East then (though the Big East has some elite teams such as UConn. My guess is that Cal will be listed in the Topp 25 as an "other receiving votes" after the SMU win (assuming they take care of business against a weak Pitt team). Win out and win the first ACC tourney game they should be set for the Big Dance and could be somewhere ranked around 25 to 30.



I think the bigger issue is that Cal needs a few teams 'ahead' of them to start tanking. It is not whether Cal is good enough, but more if Cal is better than a few other teams that may have a better record against quads 1 and 2 (I think Cal is still .500 or below in that metric).

I agree that is in the calculus. Of the bubble teams, Cal has the easiest schedule from the analysis I have seen. Built in is we beat who we should beat, and others lose to higher ranked teams. Also, if other bubble teams start making long runs into conference tourneys and Cal is upset in the first ACC game, all bets off. But if Cal
wins four more games, it hard to picture an ACC 24 win team not making the Big Dance.

Agree. Simply said Cal needs to win. 24 should be enough. The conference tourneys are both good and bad possibilities for Cal as you point out. If Cal happens to lose their first game and results from elsewhere are good for other bubble programs it could get dicey.

I think the conference tourneys could be pretty impactful to the final selections. There are a lot of teams with similar resumes.

Also the teams like Miami (OH) and St Louis need to win their tourneys. They are likely in regardless and Cal will want those leagues to be one bid leagues. And generally that is what the bracketologists have in their predictions. Though VCU is a team to watch out for. They are in some brackets and out in others. Much like Cal.
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

blungld said:

It's crazy to me that with 64+ teams making the tournament you still have to be this good and it is still this hard to make it in.


There are something like 350 D1 teams

I get the math, but the experience of razor's edge sweating out qualification when you have a 20+ win season and have a great stretch run and are pretty demonstrably a tournament worthy team seems counter intuitive with so many teams making it. I am not saying it's not exciting (sort of like the relegation battle in Premier League) or that there isn't an explanation--it's just so many teams and yet really good teams aren't in.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blungld said:

HoopDreams said:

blungld said:

It's crazy to me that with 64+ teams making the tournament you still have to be this good and it is still this hard to make it in.


There are something like 350 D1 teams

I get the math, but the experience of razor's edge sweating out qualification when you have a 20+ win season and have a great stretch run and are pretty demonstrably a tournament worthy team seems counter intuitive with so many teams making it. I am not saying it's not exciting (sort of like the relegation battle in Premier League) or that there isn't an explanation--it's just so many teams and yet really good teams aren't in.


I just hope that the ACC has enough pull and reputation that an upper middle team can have more of a claim than a 6-9 Auburn team.
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blungld said:

HoopDreams said:

blungld said:

It's crazy to me that with 64+ teams making the tournament you still have to be this good and it is still this hard to make it in.


There are something like 350 D1 teams

I get the math, but the experience of razor's edge sweating out qualification when you have a 20+ win season and have a great stretch run and are pretty demonstrably a tournament worthy team seems counter intuitive with so many teams making it. I am not saying it's not exciting (sort of like the relegation battle in Premier League) or that there isn't an explanation--it's just so many teams and yet really good teams aren't in.

I understand your emotion. To keep it real just remember that a 20+ win season cannot be relevant in our case because our schedule was so damn weak. Try to let that thought go. (I will bill you for my advice!)
concernedparent
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

blungld said:

HoopDreams said:

blungld said:

It's crazy to me that with 64+ teams making the tournament you still have to be this good and it is still this hard to make it in.


There are something like 350 D1 teams

I get the math, but the experience of razor's edge sweating out qualification when you have a 20+ win season and have a great stretch run and are pretty demonstrably a tournament worthy team seems counter intuitive with so many teams making it. I am not saying it's not exciting (sort of like the relegation battle in Premier League) or that there isn't an explanation--it's just so many teams and yet really good teams aren't in.


I just hope that the ACC has enough pull and reputation that an upper middle team can have more of a claim than a 6-9 Auburn team.

To be fair, Auburn has good wins and they played a brutal schedule. To me they are more deserving than like... Santa Clara, New Mexico who've played and beaten basically nobody.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concernedparent said:

Cal88 said:

blungld said:

HoopDreams said:

blungld said:

It's crazy to me that with 64+ teams making the tournament you still have to be this good and it is still this hard to make it in.


There are something like 350 D1 teams

I get the math, but the experience of razor's edge sweating out qualification when you have a 20+ win season and have a great stretch run and are pretty demonstrably a tournament worthy team seems counter intuitive with so many teams making it. I am not saying it's not exciting (sort of like the relegation battle in Premier League) or that there isn't an explanation--it's just so many teams and yet really good teams aren't in.


I just hope that the ACC has enough pull and reputation that an upper middle team can have more of a claim than a 6-9 Auburn team.

To be fair, Auburn has good wins and they played a brutal schedule. To me they are more deserving than like... Santa Clara, New Mexico who've played and beaten basically nobody.

Both of those schools have a nice record against Quad 2, as in, mostly against teams that are decent but will fall short of the tournament. They haven't beaten a lot of tournament teams.

Cal has the opposite resume: more good wins against tourney teams but not much in the second tier. Hard to say what is valued more.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concernedparent said:

Cal88 said:

blungld said:

HoopDreams said:

blungld said:

It's crazy to me that with 64+ teams making the tournament you still have to be this good and it is still this hard to make it in.


There are something like 350 D1 teams

I get the math, but the experience of razor's edge sweating out qualification when you have a 20+ win season and have a great stretch run and are pretty demonstrably a tournament worthy team seems counter intuitive with so many teams making it. I am not saying it's not exciting (sort of like the relegation battle in Premier League) or that there isn't an explanation--it's just so many teams and yet really good teams aren't in.


I just hope that the ACC has enough pull and reputation that an upper middle team can have more of a claim than a 6-9 Auburn team.

To be fair, Auburn has good wins and they played a brutal schedule. To me they are more deserving than like... Santa Clara, New Mexico who've played and beaten basically nobody.


Auburn scheduled many good teams OOC, and lost most of these games. They are 5-11 in Q1, vs 4-4 for Cal.

As a general rule, if you have a losing record in your conference, you don't deserve a bid, period.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.