Dai Dai handle

1,659 Views | 13 Replies | Last: 19 days ago by HoopDreams
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Love watching Dai Dai Ames. Best handle since Randle.

One of the reasons he's so shifty and difficult to defend is how low he gets. This is high difficulty and requires a lot of strength and flexibility. If you think otherwise, just try it yourself without a ball.

This is one of the secrets of players like Kyrie, maybe the best ball handle ever

https://instagr.am/p/DVmYXvlEsFQ

smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HD - thanks for the low-down
sighned, not dead yet # funk trunk; i.c.e. too
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
smh said:

HD - thanks for the low-down

He and Jerome Randle are cut from the same cloth… but in Dai Dai's case I think he has a better shot at the NBA than Randle did because he has a better long-range shot. But to get to a Round 1 or 2 draft pick he will need to boost his shooting even more (good for Cal bball version 2026-27!)
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barsad said:

smh said:

HD - thanks for the low-down

He and Jerome Randle are cut from the same cloth… but in Dai Dai's case I think he has a better shot at the NBA than Randle did because he has a better long-range shot. But to get to a Round 1 or 2 draft pick he will need to boost his shooting even more (good for Cal bball version 2026-27!)

Not sure where Dai Dai ends up, (hope he does well), but there is no way he is a better long range shooter than Jerome. Jerome's career percentage from 3 at Cal was 40.5%, and that is based on a large quantity, he is the Cal record holder with 252 made 3 pointers. And I probably saw every one of them and there were many that came from at least a couple of feet behind the arc.
Onebearofpower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RedlessWardrobe said:

barsad said:

smh said:

HD - thanks for the low-down

He and Jerome Randle are cut from the same cloth… but in Dai Dai's case I think he has a better shot at the NBA than Randle did because he has a better long-range shot. But to get to a Round 1 or 2 draft pick he will need to boost his shooting even more (good for Cal bball version 2026-27!)

Not sure where Dai Dai ends up, (hope he does well), but there is no way he is a better long range shooter than Jerome. Jerome's career percentage from 3 at Cal was 40.5%, and that is based on a large quantity, he is the Cal record holder with 252 made 3 pointers. And I probably saw every one of them and there were many that came from at least a couple of feet behind the arc.

Still he played half his time on a much shorter three point line and the other half on a much much shorter three point line. Dai Dai has taken many beyond the arc like Randle also but Randle had lots of catch and shoot on the line. Idk if he is on Randle's level but it is hard to compare since he has taken plenty of long twos that would have been threes in Randle's first two seasons.
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RedlessWardrobe said:

barsad said:

smh said:

HD - thanks for the low-down

He and Jerome Randle are cut from the same cloth… but in Dai Dai's case I think he has a better shot at the NBA than Randle did because he has a better long-range shot. But to get to a Round 1 or 2 draft pick he will need to boost his shooting even more (good for Cal bball version 2026-27!)

Not sure where Dai Dai ends up, (hope he does well), but there is no way he is a better long range shooter than Jerome. Jerome's career percentage from 3 at Cal was 40.5%, and that is based on a large quantity, he is the Cal record holder with 252 made 3 pointers. And I probably saw every one of them and there were many that came from at least a couple of feet behind the arc.

Like I said, he has to improve. He's only 3% behind Jerome on career 3P%, seems reasonable for him to get there if he replaces Bell and Camden's role next year and stops playing all hero ball.
I always wondered why Jerome wasn't given a chance except in summer leagues at the NBA… I suspect being 5' 9" didn't help, Dai Dai has that advantage (6'2").
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He definitely can improve. But to me the biggest strength of Dai Dai's offensive game is his ability to force the defender to retreat, which allows him to stop and fade for his mid range jumper as opposed to the three point shot. I remember when KJ played and by his senior year his quickness allowed him to stop on a dime for a mid range basket. And he had a damn good NBA career with that.
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Onebearofpower said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

barsad said:

smh said:

HD - thanks for the low-down

He and Jerome Randle are cut from the same cloth… but in Dai Dai's case I think he has a better shot at the NBA than Randle did because he has a better long-range shot. But to get to a Round 1 or 2 draft pick he will need to boost his shooting even more (good for Cal bball version 2026-27!)

Not sure where Dai Dai ends up, (hope he does well), but there is no way he is a better long range shooter than Jerome. Jerome's career percentage from 3 at Cal was 40.5%, and that is based on a large quantity, he is the Cal record holder with 252 made 3 pointers. And I probably saw every one of them and there were many that came from at least a couple of feet behind the arc.

Still he played half his time on a much shorter three point line and the other half on a much much shorter three point line. Dai Dai has taken many beyond the arc like Randle also but Randle had lots of catch and shoot on the line. Idk if he is on Randle's level but it is hard to compare since he has taken plenty of long twos that would have been threes in Randle's first two seasons.

I know it was like 16 years ago but we must have been seeing something different when Jerome played. He wasn't a "catch and shoot" guy, hard to do that when you're the point guard. And because he was 5-9 the majority of his threes came from a distance that would still be three pointers today. I can honestly say in my opinion that Jerome had a greater range on his shot than any player ever to play at Cal.
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ames is great but he is a 2 trapped in a 1's body. His offseason work has to be driving, drawing, and kicking.
Take care of your Chicken
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RedlessWardrobe said:

Onebearofpower said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

barsad said:

smh said:

HD - thanks for the low-down

He and Jerome Randle are cut from the same cloth… but in Dai Dai's case I think he has a better shot at the NBA than Randle did because he has a better long-range shot. But to get to a Round 1 or 2 draft pick he will need to boost his shooting even more (good for Cal bball version 2026-27!)

Not sure where Dai Dai ends up, (hope he does well), but there is no way he is a better long range shooter than Jerome. Jerome's career percentage from 3 at Cal was 40.5%, and that is based on a large quantity, he is the Cal record holder with 252 made 3 pointers. And I probably saw every one of them and there were many that came from at least a couple of feet behind the arc.

Still he played half his time on a much shorter three point line and the other half on a much much shorter three point line. Dai Dai has taken many beyond the arc like Randle also but Randle had lots of catch and shoot on the line. Idk if he is on Randle's level but it is hard to compare since he has taken plenty of long twos that would have been threes in Randle's first two seasons.

I know it was like 16 years ago but we must have been seeing something different when Jerome played. He wasn't a "catch and shoot" guy, hard to do that when you're the point guard. And because he was 5-9 the majority of his threes came from a distance that would still be three pointers today. I can honestly say in my opinion that Jerome had a greater range on his shot than any player ever to play at Cal.

I agree with much of what you say. Randle is a favorite player of mine. Each year he played, it seemed like defenders were trying to force him to move farther and farther out to take his threes, if he still dared to take them. If he hadn't been making them, Montgomery ( and maybe Ben Braun) would had sat him down to give him a lecture about not shooting from so far away. But they probably never did, because he kept shooting them.

It was evident he was doing a lot of work in the weight room, because he was getting bigger and stronger every year, in order to be able to shoot from farther and farther away.

I think it is fair to say that he had the greatest range among guards or smaller players who played for Cal, but there were several much bigger players who shot the 3-ball very well from even longer distances. Sophomore 6-4 Bill Dreher shot them at 50% for Cal. Ryan Anderson and Lamond Murray both made plenty of threes for Cal and the NBA. Amit Tamir was another big man who made a number of threes at Cal. Jaylon Tyson, Jalen Celestine had good three point range.

One thing that should be mentioned, and that is that Jerome Randle was a great clutch player as well, especially with his three point shot. For that, size does not matter. Heart does.

SFCityBear
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good to hear from you!
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

Love watching Dai Dai Ames. Best handle since Randle.

One of the reasons he's so shifty and difficult to defend is how low he gets. This is high difficulty and requires a lot of strength and flexibility. If you think otherwise, just try it yourself without a ball.

This is one of the secrets of players like Kyrie, maybe the best ball handle ever

https://instagr.am/p/DVmYXvlEsFQ



HD, your thread seems to have drifted away from your original intent, which was to praise and discuss the handle of Dai Dai Ames.

I will try to troll up some responses to get back to Dai Dai's handle, and I apologize in advance if I offend anyone, because we all have our favorite players, at Cal, in the NBA, and elsewhere.

The best ball handlers I have seen at Cal would include Jason Kidd (the strongest handle), KJ of course, Bob Matheny from a little before my time, Bobby Wendell (Newell's best), Al Buch. Dick Smith and Denny Lewis(Rene's best), Charlie Johnson and Phil Chenier of the Jim Padgett era.

In the NBA, I liked the handles of Bob Cousy, KC Jones, Jerry West, Guy Rodgers, John Stockton, and Steve Nash.

Overall the best I ever saw in person were two Harlem Globetrotters, Marques Haynes, and Leon Hilliard. Attended the free SF Examiner Basketball School for kids, and Hank Luisetti (who my dad said was the best player he ever saw. Hank told introduced Leon Hilliard and challenged us kids to chase Hilliard as he put on a dribbling exhibition. He ran about 25 of us all over the gym, dribbling that basketball straight up and down, while lying on his back rolling over, and taking off, bouncing the ball between our legs, catching it and taking off again. None of us ever touched that ball. I did see the best Trotter dribbler before Leon, who was Marques Haynes, and he was every bit as good as Leon.

All of these players played in eras prior to the major rule change which changed basketball from dribbling to handling. Dribbling the ball had been controlled by requiring players when bouncing a ball off the floor, must keep their hand on top of the ball at all times. If a player put his hand below the equator of the ball, it was called carrying or palming, and was a violation, and the game was stopped and the ball was awarded to opposing team, a turnover.

That rule against palming was made to keep the dribbler from having an advantage on the defender. With the rule changed now, it makes for a more exciting game, perhaps. More scoring, and more fans buying tickets. I think the most extreme incident I have seen was Kevin Durant with the Warriors, where I saw him during a dribble, put his right hand under the ball, passed the ball behind his back to his left hand, and drove to the basket for a layup, leaving his defender in the dust.

I guess Tim Hardaway was the first or best example of using the new rule, or rather having no rule about palming anymore. He was high skilled in developing new crossover moves. Now everyone does it. I've little kids barely able to reach the rim with a shot practicing their handles. It is a new world. I wonder how Jorge the defender was able to defend these handlers, but he did.

I don't watch modern basketball much now, but I would say Dai Dai has an excellent handle, as good as we have seen at Cal, IMO. I don't much like the way he plays, because the game stops when he gets the ball in the key. He dribbles right and left, forward and backward, until he finally gets an edge. He is very effective. He has a great fade away shot, and a very good three point shot. But when he gets the ball, it slows the game down. His teammates stand around and watch, while he works his magic. I don't know if Madsen coaches the team this way, for his teammates to get him the ball and then stand around and watch his magic. I prefer a faster moving game, or at least a game where more players get involved. Ames is a very capable passer, and I'd like to see Madsen let him do more of that. Run some two man plays, at least. We have other skilled one-on-one players on this team. But I think they would have been a more dangerous team if they ran less one-on-one. Madsen needs to recruit some facilitators. He has not landed one yet. Jaylon Tyson could have been that guy, but we needed his scoring.





SFCityBear
PenBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't forget Gene "the dream" Ransom.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SF, yes what is called palming has changed drastically but I don't think the technical rule changed or changed much (please fill me in)

Today's rule is you can't have your hand under the ball. You can have it on the side of the ball.

The other thing that changed ball handling is the realization that a player can take 2 steps backwards just like he can take 2 steps forward before a shot. When James Harden first did it in the NBA every thought it was a travel until he showed how it was within the rules.

But certainly there are a lot of players at all levels who palm the ball and it doesn't get called.

The NBA is worst as it favors the stars

But I was at the gym on Saturday and watched a player backdown a player in the post and he clearly had is hand completely under the ball several times, but if anyone ever called him out it would have started a big argument

Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.