The Official Russian Invasion of Ukraine Thread

2,042,788 Views | 13533 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by sycasey
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Putin on May 9th said the war was winding down; Trump made similar comments.

This weekend Ukraine had a massive drone attack on Moscow, most appear to have been blocked. Rumors also that Ukraine will launch attacks from the Baltics. A potential serious turn. Putin currently in China.

Scott Ritter sees this as a European-led attack, and Zelensky still trying to pull NATO into the battle. Ritter believes Russia will respond forcefully, and claims that France, Germany, and the UK think Russia should be attacked by 2029? Humm, when Trump is gone? How can a weak and depleted EU attack anyone? And why? If the Ukraine war is over, why preemptively attack Russia? Resources?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sobering interview w Sergey Karaganov, prominent Russian political scientist and foreign policy strategist.

He sees the Ukrainian/ EU war dragging on unnecessarily, elites targeting Russia, so claims his views have gained traction. He acknowledges their losses, and 3x, 4x more for Ukraine. He considers the current EU leaders "mad dogs" who have "lost their minds" and "sense of history".

- target European military bases / key installations (missiles)
- early strike on the elites / break their desire for war
- if no change of position, limited nuclear strikes on European nations
- changing their military doctrine to accept the above options (limited nuclear war)
- Europe is passe for Russia
- he foresees 20 years of war



Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sounds catastrophic, let's hope it's a worst case scenario.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We may soon see troubling events. The St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) is scheduled for June 36. The "Russian Davos" "brings together the chief executives of major Russian and international companies, heads of state, political leaders, prime ministers, deputy prime ministers, departmental ministers, and governors." Attendance this year is expected to be 20,000.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Sobering interview w Sergey Karaganov, prominent Russian political scientist and foreign policy strategist.

He sees the Ukrainian/ EU war dragging on unnecessarily, elites targeting Russia, so claims his views have gained traction. He acknowledges their losses, and 3x, 4x more for Ukraine. He considers the current EU leaders "mad dogs" who have "lost their minds" and "sense of history".

Maybe a lot of this was foreseeable and Putin starting the war was a huge mistake.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

movielover said:

Sobering interview w Sergey Karaganov, prominent Russian political scientist and foreign policy strategist.

He sees the Ukrainian/ EU war dragging on unnecessarily, elites targeting Russia, so claims his views have gained traction. He acknowledges their losses, and 3x, 4x more for Ukraine. He considers the current EU leaders "mad dogs" who have "lost their minds" and "sense of history".

Maybe a lot of this was foreseeable and Putin starting the war was a huge mistake.


War with Zelensky's Ukraine was unavoidable, had Russia not intervened in 22 to repel the Kyiv army in the Donbas, the rebels there would have been overrun, and Kyiv would have turned to Crimea, which would have been much harder to defend for the Russian without the land bridge.

This is what forced Putin's hand, he held out till the last moment, and has been heavily criticized by the Donbas armies for not intervening earlier. He has also been criticized at home for having let this war linger on too long.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

Sobering interview w Sergey Karaganov, prominent Russian political scientist and foreign policy strategist.

He sees the Ukrainian/ EU war dragging on unnecessarily, elites targeting Russia, so claims his views have gained traction. He acknowledges their losses, and 3x, 4x more for Ukraine. He considers the current EU leaders "mad dogs" who have "lost their minds" and "sense of history".

Maybe a lot of this was foreseeable and Putin starting the war was a huge mistake.


War with Zelensky's Ukraine was unavoidable, had Russia not intervened in 22 to repel the Kyiv army in the Donbas, the rebels there would have been overrun, and Kyiv would have turned to Crimea, which would have been much harder to defend for the Russian without the land bridge.

Oh no, Putin might not have been able to keep the other land he invaded.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The culturally Russian people who wanted to be Russian again. BTW, they're very happy now.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

Sobering interview w Sergey Karaganov, prominent Russian political scientist and foreign policy strategist.

He sees the Ukrainian/ EU war dragging on unnecessarily, elites targeting Russia, so claims his views have gained traction. He acknowledges their losses, and 3x, 4x more for Ukraine. He considers the current EU leaders "mad dogs" who have "lost their minds" and "sense of history".

Maybe a lot of this was foreseeable and Putin starting the war was a huge mistake.


War with Zelensky's Ukraine was unavoidable, had Russia not intervened in 22 to repel the Kyiv army in the Donbas, the rebels there would have been overrun, and Kyiv would have turned to Crimea, which would have been much harder to defend for the Russian without the land bridge.

Oh no, Putin might not have been able to keep the other land he invaded.


You don't think that the Crimeans, who are overwhelmingly ethnic Russians, don't want to be part of Russia, but want to join the country that :
  • wants to restrict their language and cultural heritage
  • bans them from celebrating their grandfathers win over nazi Germany, forcing them instead to honor the memory of Bandera, leader of the largest SS division that their grandfathers died in great numbers fighting
  • is the most corrupt country in Europe, with a prewar GDP per capita 3 times lower than Russia
  • cut off potable water from Crimea out of pure spite, Kyiv diverting their water into the Black Sea, severely hampering Crimea's key agriculture and tourism sectors
It is not surprising that because of all these reasons above Crimeans voted overwhelmingly to separate from Kyiv and join Russia, a choice that was confirmed by 3 independent western polls.

I know your argument was to say that you can't have referendums during wartime, but I don't see anyone protesting the gerrymandeing and balkanization of Yugoslavia, Iraq, Sudan, Somalia etc because their breakup was pushed by the US (often through military intervention).

Crimea was cut off from Russia by Khrushchev in the 1950s and lopped into Ukraine for arbitrary internal Soviet reasons. The Soviet Socialist Republic of Ukraine as well was/is an amalgam of western Galiceans, Central Ukrainians who are majority russophones (esp in larger cities like Kiev or Dnipro) and ethnic Russians in the east and south. The civil war, ongoing since 2014 (not 2022) is a reflection of these divisions that were exacerbated by the Kyiv government rejecting the Russian identity of 30%-40% of their population.

The latter territories that were historically Russian were lopped into the Soviet Socialist Republic of Ukraine by Lenin in the 1920s. At that time the main enemy of the Bolcheviks were Russian nationalists, so the latter played off ethnic divisions with the Russian Empire, pushing local identities in satellite Soviet states.



That is the deeper historical and cultural context of the Ukraine war that is completely ignored in the coverage of this war, and that must be addressed as the basis for any durable peace in that country.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

Sobering interview w Sergey Karaganov, prominent Russian political scientist and foreign policy strategist.

He sees the Ukrainian/ EU war dragging on unnecessarily, elites targeting Russia, so claims his views have gained traction. He acknowledges their losses, and 3x, 4x more for Ukraine. He considers the current EU leaders "mad dogs" who have "lost their minds" and "sense of history".

Maybe a lot of this was foreseeable and Putin starting the war was a huge mistake.


War with Zelensky's Ukraine was unavoidable, had Russia not intervened in 22 to repel the Kyiv army in the Donbas, the rebels there would have been overrun, and Kyiv would have turned to Crimea, which would have been much harder to defend for the Russian without the land bridge.

Oh no, Putin might not have been able to keep the other land he invaded.


You don't think that the Crimeans, who are overwhelmingly ethnic Russians, don't want to be part of Russia, but want to join the country that :

Irrelevant. You don't just go in and take the land even if that's what you think they want. There should be a legitimate process and vote for that.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

Sobering interview w Sergey Karaganov, prominent Russian political scientist and foreign policy strategist.

He sees the Ukrainian/ EU war dragging on unnecessarily, elites targeting Russia, so claims his views have gained traction. He acknowledges their losses, and 3x, 4x more for Ukraine. He considers the current EU leaders "mad dogs" who have "lost their minds" and "sense of history".

Maybe a lot of this was foreseeable and Putin starting the war was a huge mistake.


War with Zelensky's Ukraine was unavoidable, had Russia not intervened in 22 to repel the Kyiv army in the Donbas, the rebels there would have been overrun, and Kyiv would have turned to Crimea, which would have been much harder to defend for the Russian without the land bridge.

Oh no, Putin might not have been able to keep the other land he invaded.


You don't think that the Crimeans, who are overwhelmingly ethnic Russians, don't want to be part of Russia, but want to join the country that :

Irrelevant. You don't just go in and take the land even if that's what you think they want. There should be a legitimate process and vote for that.

I would 100% if this wasn't all started with a CIA backed revolution in Ukraine's capital.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

Sobering interview w Sergey Karaganov, prominent Russian political scientist and foreign policy strategist.

He sees the Ukrainian/ EU war dragging on unnecessarily, elites targeting Russia, so claims his views have gained traction. He acknowledges their losses, and 3x, 4x more for Ukraine. He considers the current EU leaders "mad dogs" who have "lost their minds" and "sense of history".

Maybe a lot of this was foreseeable and Putin starting the war was a huge mistake.


War with Zelensky's Ukraine was unavoidable, had Russia not intervened in 22 to repel the Kyiv army in the Donbas, the rebels there would have been overrun, and Kyiv would have turned to Crimea, which would have been much harder to defend for the Russian without the land bridge.

Oh no, Putin might not have been able to keep the other land he invaded.


You don't think that the Crimeans, who are overwhelmingly ethnic Russians, don't want to be part of Russia, but want to join the country that :

Irrelevant. You don't just go in and take the land even if that's what you think they want. There should be a legitimate process and vote for that.


This amounts to procedural pedantry, most likely motivated by your ideological bias, simply refusing the reality of the facts I have carefully laid out above.

There was a referendum and several independent polls that all confirm that over 3/4 of Crimeans, conservatively speaking, wanted to join Russia - see below.

If anything, it was incredibly fortuitous for Crimeans that their transition occurred with virtually no bloodshed and ended up reflecting their wishes and aspirations.


Post-referendum polls

The results of a survey by the U.S. government Broadcasting Board of Governors agency, conducted April 2129, 2014, showed that 83% of Crimeans felt that the results of the March 16 referendum on Crimea's status likely reflected the views of most people there, whereas this view is shared only by 30% in the rest of Ukraine.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Crimean_status_referendum#cite_note-138][132]
[/url]
Gallup conducted an immediate post-referendum survey of Ukraine and Crimea and published their results in April 2014. Gallup reported that, among the population of Crimea, 93.6% of ethnic Russians and 68.4% of ethnic Ukrainians believed the referendum result accurately represents the will of the Crimean people. Only 1.7% of ethnic Russians and 14.5% of ethnic Ukrainians living in Crimea thought that the referendum results did not accurately reflect the views of the Crimean people.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Crimean_status_referendum#cite_note-139][133][/url] According to Gallup's survey performed on April 2127, 82.8% of Crimean people consider the referendum results reflecting most Crimeans' views,[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Crimean_status_referendum#cite_note-Gallup-140][134][/url] and 73.9% of Crimeans say Crimea's becoming part of Russia will make life better for themselves and their families, while 5.5% disagree.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Crimean_status_referendum#cite_note-Gallup-140][134]
[/url]
In May 2014, Washington, D.C., pollster Pew Research published results of a survey that encompassed Crimea, Ukraine, and Russia, in which it was reported that 88% of Crimeans believed the government of Kyiv should officially recognize the result of Crimea's referendum.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Crimean_status_referendum#cite_note-141][135][/url] According to survey carried out by Pew Research Center in April 2014, the majority of Crimean residents say they believed the referendum was free and fair (91%) and that the government in Kyiv ought to recognize the results of the vote (88%).[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Crimean_status_referendum#cite_note-142][136]
[/url]
Between December 12 and 25, 2014, Levada-Center carried out a survey of Crimea that was commissioned by John O'Loughlin, College Professor of Distinction and Professor of Geography at the University of Colorado in Boulder, and Gerard Toal (Gearid Tuathail), Professor of Government and International Affairs at Virginia Tech's National Capital Region campus. The results of that survey were published by Open Democracy in March, 2015, and reported that, overall, 84% of Crimeans felt the choice to secede from Ukraine and accede to Russia was "Absolutely the right decision", with the next-largest segment of respondents saying the decision to return to Russia was the "Generally right decision".
The survey commissioners, John O'Loughlin and Gerard Toal, wrote in their Open Democracy article that, while they felt that the referendum was "an illegal act under international law", their survey shows "It is also an act that enjoys the widespread support of the peninsula's inhabitants, with the important exception of its Crimean Tatar population" with "widespread support for Crimea's decision to secede from Ukraine and join the Russian Federation one year ago". Their survey also reported that a majority of Crimean Tatars viewed Crimea's return to Russia as either the "Absolutely right decision" or the "Generally right decision".[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Crimean_status_referendum#cite_note-143][137]
[/url]
From January 16 22, 2015, Germany's GfK Group, with support from the Canada Fund for Local Initiatives, followed-up their pre-referendum survey of Crimeans' voting intention with a post-referendum survey about how satisfied Crimeans are with the outcome of their referendum. GfK's post-referendum survey found that 82% of Crimeans "Fully endorse" Crimea's referendum and return to Russia, while another 11% "Mostly endorse" it.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Crimean_status_referendum#cite_note-144][138][/url]
According to a poll of the Crimeans by the Ukrainian branch of Germany's biggest market research organization, GfK, on January 1622, 2015: "Eighty-two percent of those polled said they fully supported Crimea's inclusion in Russia, and another 11 percent expressed partial support. Only 4 percent spoke out against it. ...Fifty-one percent reported their well-being had improved in the past year."[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Crimean_status_referendum#cite_note-poll-145][139][/url]
Bloomberg's Leonid Bershidsky noted that "The calls were made on Jan. 1622 to people living in towns with a population of 20,000 or more, which probably led to the peninsula's native population, the Tatars, being underrepresented because many of them live in small villages. On the other hand, no calls were placed in Sevastopol, the most pro-Russian city in Crimea. Even with these limitations, it was the most representative independent poll taken on the peninsula since its annexation."[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Crimean_status_referendum#cite_note-poll-145][139][/url]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Crimean_status_referendum#Official_results


Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

movielover said:

Sobering interview w Sergey Karaganov, prominent Russian political scientist and foreign policy strategist.

He sees the Ukrainian/ EU war dragging on unnecessarily, elites targeting Russia, so claims his views have gained traction. He acknowledges their losses, and 3x, 4x more for Ukraine. He considers the current EU leaders "mad dogs" who have "lost their minds" and "sense of history".

Maybe a lot of this was foreseeable and Putin starting the war was a huge mistake.



movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aka Darth Nuland.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kyiv regime bombs a Donbas college dorm, killing dozens of students. Shows how much they really care about the Russian minority there.

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
More motivation for Putin to act? He's been quiet reserved.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

Sobering interview w Sergey Karaganov, prominent Russian political scientist and foreign policy strategist.

He sees the Ukrainian/ EU war dragging on unnecessarily, elites targeting Russia, so claims his views have gained traction. He acknowledges their losses, and 3x, 4x more for Ukraine. He considers the current EU leaders "mad dogs" who have "lost their minds" and "sense of history".

Maybe a lot of this was foreseeable and Putin starting the war was a huge mistake.


War with Zelensky's Ukraine was unavoidable, had Russia not intervened in 22 to repel the Kyiv army in the Donbas, the rebels there would have been overrun, and Kyiv would have turned to Crimea, which would have been much harder to defend for the Russian without the land bridge.

Oh no, Putin might not have been able to keep the other land he invaded.


You don't think that the Crimeans, who are overwhelmingly ethnic Russians, don't want to be part of Russia, but want to join the country that :

Irrelevant. You don't just go in and take the land even if that's what you think they want. There should be a legitimate process and vote for that.

I would 100% if this wasn't all started with a CIA backed revolution in Ukraine's capital.

"CIA backed" is doing a lot of work there. The US was in favor of the revolution, for sure. There's no evidence they started it.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

Sobering interview w Sergey Karaganov, prominent Russian political scientist and foreign policy strategist.

He sees the Ukrainian/ EU war dragging on unnecessarily, elites targeting Russia, so claims his views have gained traction. He acknowledges their losses, and 3x, 4x more for Ukraine. He considers the current EU leaders "mad dogs" who have "lost their minds" and "sense of history".

Maybe a lot of this was foreseeable and Putin starting the war was a huge mistake.


War with Zelensky's Ukraine was unavoidable, had Russia not intervened in 22 to repel the Kyiv army in the Donbas, the rebels there would have been overrun, and Kyiv would have turned to Crimea, which would have been much harder to defend for the Russian without the land bridge.

Oh no, Putin might not have been able to keep the other land he invaded.


You don't think that the Crimeans, who are overwhelmingly ethnic Russians, don't want to be part of Russia, but want to join the country that :

Irrelevant. You don't just go in and take the land even if that's what you think they want. There should be a legitimate process and vote for that.

I would 100% if this wasn't all started with a CIA backed revolution in Ukraine's capital.

"CIA backed" is doing a lot of work there. The US was in favor of the revolution, for sure. There's no evidence they started it.


I never said they "started" it, but they certainly proactively backed it.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

Sobering interview w Sergey Karaganov, prominent Russian political scientist and foreign policy strategist.

He sees the Ukrainian/ EU war dragging on unnecessarily, elites targeting Russia, so claims his views have gained traction. He acknowledges their losses, and 3x, 4x more for Ukraine. He considers the current EU leaders "mad dogs" who have "lost their minds" and "sense of history".

Maybe a lot of this was foreseeable and Putin starting the war was a huge mistake.


War with Zelensky's Ukraine was unavoidable, had Russia not intervened in 22 to repel the Kyiv army in the Donbas, the rebels there would have been overrun, and Kyiv would have turned to Crimea, which would have been much harder to defend for the Russian without the land bridge.

Oh no, Putin might not have been able to keep the other land he invaded.


You don't think that the Crimeans, who are overwhelmingly ethnic Russians, don't want to be part of Russia, but want to join the country that :

Irrelevant. You don't just go in and take the land even if that's what you think they want. There should be a legitimate process and vote for that.

I would 100% if this wasn't all started with a CIA backed revolution in Ukraine's capital.

"CIA backed" is doing a lot of work there. The US was in favor of the revolution, for sure. There's no evidence they started it.


I never said they "started" it, but they certainly proactively backed it.


They did actively cultivate, fund, arm and support the elements that pulled the Maidan Coup, since the 1950s at the very least, when SS leaders from Ukraine who fled to the west were funded and groomed by NATO.

Not much different from the other coups in a very long pattern of regime changes since Honduras and Iran in the early 50s.
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

Sobering interview w Sergey Karaganov, prominent Russian political scientist and foreign policy strategist.

He sees the Ukrainian/ EU war dragging on unnecessarily, elites targeting Russia, so claims his views have gained traction. He acknowledges their losses, and 3x, 4x more for Ukraine. He considers the current EU leaders "mad dogs" who have "lost their minds" and "sense of history".

Maybe a lot of this was foreseeable and Putin starting the war was a huge mistake.


War with Zelensky's Ukraine was unavoidable, had Russia not intervened in 22 to repel the Kyiv army in the Donbas, the rebels there would have been overrun, and Kyiv would have turned to Crimea, which would have been much harder to defend for the Russian without the land bridge.

Oh no, Putin might not have been able to keep the other land he invaded.


You don't think that the Crimeans, who are overwhelmingly ethnic Russians, don't want to be part of Russia, but want to join the country that :

Irrelevant. You don't just go in and take the land even if that's what you think they want. There should be a legitimate process and vote for that.

I would 100% if this wasn't all started with a CIA backed revolution in Ukraine's capital.

"CIA backed" is doing a lot of work there. The US was in favor of the revolution, for sure. There's no evidence they started it.

sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

Sobering interview w Sergey Karaganov, prominent Russian political scientist and foreign policy strategist.

He sees the Ukrainian/ EU war dragging on unnecessarily, elites targeting Russia, so claims his views have gained traction. He acknowledges their losses, and 3x, 4x more for Ukraine. He considers the current EU leaders "mad dogs" who have "lost their minds" and "sense of history".

Maybe a lot of this was foreseeable and Putin starting the war was a huge mistake.


War with Zelensky's Ukraine was unavoidable, had Russia not intervened in 22 to repel the Kyiv army in the Donbas, the rebels there would have been overrun, and Kyiv would have turned to Crimea, which would have been much harder to defend for the Russian without the land bridge.

Oh no, Putin might not have been able to keep the other land he invaded.


You don't think that the Crimeans, who are overwhelmingly ethnic Russians, don't want to be part of Russia, but want to join the country that :

Irrelevant. You don't just go in and take the land even if that's what you think they want. There should be a legitimate process and vote for that.

I would 100% if this wasn't all started with a CIA backed revolution in Ukraine's capital.

"CIA backed" is doing a lot of work there. The US was in favor of the revolution, for sure. There's no evidence they started it.


I never said they "started" it, but they certainly proactively backed it.

Verbally, yes.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

Sobering interview w Sergey Karaganov, prominent Russian political scientist and foreign policy strategist.

He sees the Ukrainian/ EU war dragging on unnecessarily, elites targeting Russia, so claims his views have gained traction. He acknowledges their losses, and 3x, 4x more for Ukraine. He considers the current EU leaders "mad dogs" who have "lost their minds" and "sense of history".

Maybe a lot of this was foreseeable and Putin starting the war was a huge mistake.


War with Zelensky's Ukraine was unavoidable, had Russia not intervened in 22 to repel the Kyiv army in the Donbas, the rebels there would have been overrun, and Kyiv would have turned to Crimea, which would have been much harder to defend for the Russian without the land bridge.

Oh no, Putin might not have been able to keep the other land he invaded.


You don't think that the Crimeans, who are overwhelmingly ethnic Russians, don't want to be part of Russia, but want to join the country that :

Irrelevant. You don't just go in and take the land even if that's what you think they want. There should be a legitimate process and vote for that.

I would 100% if this wasn't all started with a CIA backed revolution in Ukraine's capital.

"CIA backed" is doing a lot of work there. The US was in favor of the revolution, for sure. There's no evidence they started it.


I never said they "started" it, but they certainly proactively backed it.

Verbally, yes.


You cannot possibly be that naive.

Billions spent by NATO funding, arming and training Ukraine's army. Not even the hardcore slava ukraini will deny that. Nuland even staffed the post-Maidan cabinet, clearly shown in a phone conversation.

The more interesting aspect is the examine the postwar modern history of the far right Ukrainian nationalist movement and NATO's role in building it up since the 1950s. I've posting some interesting material on that a couple of years ago.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

Sobering interview w Sergey Karaganov, prominent Russian political scientist and foreign policy strategist.

He sees the Ukrainian/ EU war dragging on unnecessarily, elites targeting Russia, so claims his views have gained traction. He acknowledges their losses, and 3x, 4x more for Ukraine. He considers the current EU leaders "mad dogs" who have "lost their minds" and "sense of history".

Maybe a lot of this was foreseeable and Putin starting the war was a huge mistake.


War with Zelensky's Ukraine was unavoidable, had Russia not intervened in 22 to repel the Kyiv army in the Donbas, the rebels there would have been overrun, and Kyiv would have turned to Crimea, which would have been much harder to defend for the Russian without the land bridge.

Oh no, Putin might not have been able to keep the other land he invaded.


You don't think that the Crimeans, who are overwhelmingly ethnic Russians, don't want to be part of Russia, but want to join the country that :

Irrelevant. You don't just go in and take the land even if that's what you think they want. There should be a legitimate process and vote for that.

I would 100% if this wasn't all started with a CIA backed revolution in Ukraine's capital.

"CIA backed" is doing a lot of work there. The US was in favor of the revolution, for sure. There's no evidence they started it.


I never said they "started" it, but they certainly proactively backed it.

Verbally, yes.


You cannot possibly be that naive.

Billions spent by NATO funding, arming and training Ukraine's army.

Before or after Crimea was annexed?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

Sobering interview w Sergey Karaganov, prominent Russian political scientist and foreign policy strategist.

He sees the Ukrainian/ EU war dragging on unnecessarily, elites targeting Russia, so claims his views have gained traction. He acknowledges their losses, and 3x, 4x more for Ukraine. He considers the current EU leaders "mad dogs" who have "lost their minds" and "sense of history".

Maybe a lot of this was foreseeable and Putin starting the war was a huge mistake.


War with Zelensky's Ukraine was unavoidable, had Russia not intervened in 22 to repel the Kyiv army in the Donbas, the rebels there would have been overrun, and Kyiv would have turned to Crimea, which would have been much harder to defend for the Russian without the land bridge.

Oh no, Putin might not have been able to keep the other land he invaded.


You don't think that the Crimeans, who are overwhelmingly ethnic Russians, don't want to be part of Russia, but want to join the country that :

Irrelevant. You don't just go in and take the land even if that's what you think they want. There should be a legitimate process and vote for that.

I would 100% if this wasn't all started with a CIA backed revolution in Ukraine's capital.

"CIA backed" is doing a lot of work there. The US was in favor of the revolution, for sure. There's no evidence they started it.


I never said they "started" it, but they certainly proactively backed it.

Verbally, yes.


You cannot possibly be that naive.

Billions spent by NATO funding, arming and training Ukraine's army.

Before or after Crimea was annexed?


About 20 years before. NATO started training in Ukraine in the 1990s.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Checkmate.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

Sobering interview w Sergey Karaganov, prominent Russian political scientist and foreign policy strategist.

He sees the Ukrainian/ EU war dragging on unnecessarily, elites targeting Russia, so claims his views have gained traction. He acknowledges their losses, and 3x, 4x more for Ukraine. He considers the current EU leaders "mad dogs" who have "lost their minds" and "sense of history".

Maybe a lot of this was foreseeable and Putin starting the war was a huge mistake.


War with Zelensky's Ukraine was unavoidable, had Russia not intervened in 22 to repel the Kyiv army in the Donbas, the rebels there would have been overrun, and Kyiv would have turned to Crimea, which would have been much harder to defend for the Russian without the land bridge.

Oh no, Putin might not have been able to keep the other land he invaded.


You don't think that the Crimeans, who are overwhelmingly ethnic Russians, don't want to be part of Russia, but want to join the country that :

Irrelevant. You don't just go in and take the land even if that's what you think they want. There should be a legitimate process and vote for that.

I would 100% if this wasn't all started with a CIA backed revolution in Ukraine's capital.

"CIA backed" is doing a lot of work there. The US was in favor of the revolution, for sure. There's no evidence they started it.


I never said they "started" it, but they certainly proactively backed it.

Verbally, yes.


You cannot possibly be that naive.

Billions spent by NATO funding, arming and training Ukraine's army.

Before or after Crimea was annexed?


About 20 years before. NATO started training in Ukraine in the 1990s.

And somehow this was not cause to start a war until relatively recently. (Because this stuff was pretty minor until after the Crimea thing.)
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sycasey will never acknowledge the history, the NATO / CIA buildup, the Russian cultural and religious ties, the evolving nature of Ukraine, the strategic importance of Ukraine as a launch pad for most invasions of Russia, Russia's material wealth, Banderas extremists, an installed transvestite drug-addicted actor, the most corrupt nation on earth, and Globalists / Eurowennie Betters desire for said $75 Trillion in mineral wealth.

I can't recall all the dates, Russian names, and idiosyncrasies. Russias birth rate is falling, Obama and Biden were weak, Russia is stronger than in 1995, and so the timing was right. Top it off that the European leaders lied to Russia by using Minsk I and II as a ruse to build by Ukraine to topple Putin. The supposed <idiotic> logic proposed by people like Jake Sullivan, Joe Biden, and Victoria Nuland was to start an ethnic civil war in Eastern Ukraine, it would spill over to Russia, and Putin would be toppled. Others argue Globalists and American Big Ag wanted Ukrainian dirt. I see zero logic in Russia taking all of Europe, what a fantasy. Culturally Russian, minerals-rich Eastern areas - sure.

Europe and NATO LIED about the Minsk Accords, and then leaders publicly admitted that. They boasted they were preparing to diminish Russia like dummy Lloyd Austin.

On top of all this, after the start of the SMO, Putin agreed to the Istanbul Peace Accords!!! Main item: Ukraine neutral. NATO / Boris Johnson / EU shot it down.

Maybe Sycasey is a peacenik, has TDS, is a CIA plant, or just likes to argue, but he seems acutely incapable of dealing with reality.

So why try to convince him otherwise?

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Putin Can No Longer Hide His Catastrophe - The Atlantic https://archive.ph/2026.05.23-140244/https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/05/putin-lost-control-russia/687269/
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
^Very characteristic sample of the British coverage of the Ukraine war. The Brits have always been the most anti-Russian element in the West, going back to the days of the Crimean War in the 19th century.

This is a good take on the coverage, by a father and son vlogger team that I follow:

sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Sycasey will never acknowledge the history

Oh I have acknowledged a lot of the history. I simply don't agree with you guys that any of it was rightful justification for Russia to invade Ukraine.
First Page Refresh
Page 387 of 387
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.