PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

sycasey said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

This is what Obama wanted to do through Biden and Kamala.

---

Except it was a MAGA sheriff that actually did it

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5887273-tennessee-man-settlement-charlie-kirk/amp/

---

This was an unfortunate isolated local incident. What Obama had in mind was something with a little more overreach, a little more centralized, and big brotherish.

---

Like the FCC Chair going on TV and telling network affiliates to cancel Jimmy Kimmel's show?

---

This was not a First Amendment violation. The FCC Chair did not issue formal orders, and ABC made the final decision to suspend the show. No court has ruled against the FCC Chair in this specific case.

---

sycasey said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

sycasey said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

This is what Obama wanted to do through Biden and Kamala.

---

Except it was a MAGA sheriff that actually did it

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5887273-tennessee-man-settlement-charlie-kirk/amp/

---

This was an unfortunate isolated local incident. What Obama had in mind was something with a little more overreach, a little more centralized, and big brotherish.

---

Like the FCC Chair going on TV and telling network affiliates to cancel Jimmy Kimmel's show?

---

This was not a First Amendment violation. The FCC Chair did not issue formal orders, and ABC made the final decision to suspend the show. No court has ruled against the FCC Chair in this specific case.

---

Tell me, which formal orders did Barack Obama put forward to censor speech? If we're comparing apples to apples here.

The problem is that you get to darkly speculate about what the blue team REALLY wanted to do, but then when the red team's own actions are put up for review then it suddenly has to meet the exact legal definitions to pass muster. How about we apply the same standards across the board?

---

sycasey said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

sycasey said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

This is what Obama wanted to do through Biden and Kamala.

---

Except it was a MAGA sheriff that actually did it

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5887273-tennessee-man-settlement-charlie-kirk/amp/

---

This was an unfortunate isolated local incident. What Obama had in mind was something with a little more overreach, a little more centralized, and big brotherish.

---

Like the FCC Chair going on TV and telling network affiliates to cancel Jimmy Kimmel's show?

---

This was not a First Amendment violation. The FCC Chair did not issue formal orders, and ABC made the final decision to suspend the show. No court has ruled against the FCC Chair in this specific case.

---

Tell me, which formal orders did Barack Obama put forward to censor speech? If we're comparing apples to apples here.

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

sycasey said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

This is what Obama wanted to do through Biden and Kamala.

---

Except it was a MAGA sheriff that actually did it

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5887273-tennessee-man-settlement-charlie-kirk/amp/

---

This was an unfortunate isolated local incident. What Obama had in mind was something with a little more overreach, a little more centralized, and big brotherish.

---

Like the FCC Chair going on TV and telling network affiliates to cancel Jimmy Kimmel's show?

---

This was not a First Amendment violation. The FCC Chair did not issue formal orders, and ABC made the final decision to suspend the show. No court has ruled against the FCC Chair in this specific case.

---

Tell me, which formal orders did Barack Obama put forward to censor speech? If we're comparing apples to apples here.

---

DOJ leak/press crackdown Obama's DOJ used the Espionage Act against leakers to journalists more than all previous administrations combined

Seizure of AP reporters' phone records DOJ secretly obtained records for 20+ Associated Press phone lines over two months during a leak investigation.

---

dajo9 said:

---

I'm sure if other political campaigns were hacked and released by Russia there would be talk of pizza also. I'm sure my emails have references to pizza. I hope the Russians don't hack and release my emails for Jack Posobiec to make up stories about.

---

dajo9 said:

---

I'm sure if other political campaigns were hacked and released by Russia there would be talk of pizza also. I'm sure my emails have references to pizza. I hope the Russians don't hack and release my emails for Jack Posobiec to make up stories about.

---

sycasey said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

sycasey said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

This is what Obama wanted to do through Biden and Kamala.

---

Except it was a MAGA sheriff that actually did it

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5887273-tennessee-man-settlement-charlie-kirk/amp/

---

This was an unfortunate isolated local incident. What Obama had in mind was something with a little more overreach, a little more centralized, and big brotherish.

---

Like the FCC Chair going on TV and telling network affiliates to cancel Jimmy Kimmel's show?

---

This was not a First Amendment violation. The FCC Chair did not issue formal orders, and ABC made the final decision to suspend the show. No court has ruled against the FCC Chair in this specific case.

---

Tell me, which formal orders did Barack Obama put forward to censor speech? If we're comparing apples to apples here.

The problem is that you get to darkly speculate about what the blue team REALLY wanted to do, but then when the red team's own actions are put up for review then it suddenly has to meet the exact legal definitions to pass muster. How about we apply the same standards across the board?

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

sycasey said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

sycasey said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

This is what Obama wanted to do through Biden and Kamala.

---

Except it was a MAGA sheriff that actually did it

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5887273-tennessee-man-settlement-charlie-kirk/amp/

---

This was an unfortunate isolated local incident. What Obama had in mind was something with a little more overreach, a little more centralized, and big brotherish.

---

Like the FCC Chair going on TV and telling network affiliates to cancel Jimmy Kimmel's show?

---

This was not a First Amendment violation. The FCC Chair did not issue formal orders, and ABC made the final decision to suspend the show. No court has ruled against the FCC Chair in this specific case.

---

Tell me, which formal orders did Barack Obama put forward to censor speech? If we're comparing apples to apples here.

The problem is that you get to darkly speculate about what the blue team REALLY wanted to do, but then when the red team's own actions are put up for review then it suddenly has to meet the exact legal definitions to pass muster. How about we apply the same standards across the board?

---

I just posted a video showing how Obama wanted to regulate social media. Regulate is just another way of saying controlling information. We've already seen how the FBI infiltrated tech companies like Facebook and Twitter to shadow ban and cancel conservative accounts, including President Trump himself.

Unfortunately for Obama, Elon bought Twitter and Kamala lost the election.

You brought up Kimmel, but he got his show back and then he's gone again. No one cares about Kimmel.

---

sycasey said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

sycasey said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

sycasey said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

This is what Obama wanted to do through Biden and Kamala.

---

Except it was a MAGA sheriff that actually did it

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5887273-tennessee-man-settlement-charlie-kirk/amp/

---

This was an unfortunate isolated local incident. What Obama had in mind was something with a little more overreach, a little more centralized, and big brotherish.

---

Like the FCC Chair going on TV and telling network affiliates to cancel Jimmy Kimmel's show?

---

This was not a First Amendment violation. The FCC Chair did not issue formal orders, and ABC made the final decision to suspend the show. No court has ruled against the FCC Chair in this specific case.

---

Tell me, which formal orders did Barack Obama put forward to censor speech? If we're comparing apples to apples here.

The problem is that you get to darkly speculate about what the blue team REALLY wanted to do, but then when the red team's own actions are put up for review then it suddenly has to meet the exact legal definitions to pass muster. How about we apply the same standards across the board?

---

I just posted a video showing how Obama wanted to regulate social media. Regulate is just another way of saying controlling information. We've already seen how the FBI infiltrated tech companies like Facebook and Twitter to shadow ban and cancel conservative accounts, including President Trump himself.

Unfortunately for Obama, Elon bought Twitter and Kamala lost the election.

You brought up Kimmel, but he got his show back and then he's gone again. No one cares about Kimmel.

---

You shared a video of Obama talking about stuff, not doing stuff.

---

Murderous migrants beheading innocent people in their home town is what’s making people angry, not “social media”!

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 10, 2026

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

Murderous migrants beheading innocent people in their home town is what’s making people angry, not “social media”!

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 10, 2026

---

sycasey said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

Murderous migrants beheading innocent people in their home town is what’s making people angry, not “social media”!

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 10, 2026

---

Elon Musk is a terrible person and I'd never buy another car from him.

---

What beheading is he talking about?

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

sycasey said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

Murderous migrants beheading innocent people in their home town is what’s making people angry, not “social media”!

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 10, 2026

---

Elon Musk is a terrible person and I'd never buy another car from him.

---

What beheading is he talking about?

---

Belfast, Ireland.

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

Because the topic was trending on X.

---

dajo9 said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

Because the topic was trending on X.

---

Of course it was trending. It's his algorithm.

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

Because the topic was trending on X.

---

Of course it was trending. It's his algorithm.

---

X has an algorithm. Corporate media has an agenda that leads to propaganda.

---

dajo9 said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

Because the topic was trending on X.

---

Of course it was trending. It's his algorithm.

---

X has an algorithm. Corporate media has an agenda that leads to propaganda.

---

Funny that you don't think X is corporate media. Controlled by the highly partisan richest man in the world and part of what is about to be the biggest IPO ever. The algorithm gives us what Musk wants it to give us.

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

Because the topic was trending on X.

---

Of course it was trending. It's his algorithm.

---

X has an algorithm. Corporate media has an agenda that leads to propaganda.

---

Funny that you don't think X is corporate media. Controlled by the highly partisan richest man in the world and part of what is about to be the biggest IPO ever. The algorithm gives us what Musk wants it to give us.

---

You can post whatever you just said as many times as you want on X. Musk doesn't create the content.

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

The users control the distribution of the content.

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

The users control the distribution of the content.

---