Official Trump / Vance Administration Thread

538,165 Views | 6483 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by DiabloWags
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

bearister said:

Strong rebuttal.


Thank you

"When are you going to get a clue that it is justified calling out bad people?"

Like you said, it's justified calling out bad people. That's what I'm doing now


Another strong playground rebuttal.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't be mad, I'm using your words. And trust me, kids on a playground cut way deeper than I just did
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

A study indicated that 54% of Americans have reading comprehension below the 6th grade level, according to data from the Barbara Bush Foundation for Family Literacy.

Roughly 130 million Americans.
The U.S. ranks 36th in literacy


I can only imagine how many voted for Donald Trump.

https://www.thenationalliteracyinstitute.com/2024-2025-literacy-statistics




AI: 1959-1973: The threshold for mental deficiency [word changed] was generally considered an IQ of 85

1973 Change: AAMD revised the definition to a score of 70, which significantly reduced the number of people classified as having mental deficiency [word changed].

"The American Association on Mental Deficiency (AAMD) officially lowered the IQ threshold for defining mental deficiency [word changed] to 70 in 1973. This change, adopted in the 8th edition of the AAMD manual, moved from a previous threshold of 85 (set in 1959) or 80 (depending on interpretation) to one standard deviation below the mean, effectively redefining the criteria."
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have one or two in my family.

AI: "Narcissists can have self-awareness, but it is often limited to knowing their reputation or recognizing their tactics. They frequently lack true insight into their destructive behavior and rarely use this awareness for change, instead using it to justify actions, play the victim, or maintain an inflated self-image."
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Activist Judge James Boasberg, the same judge who has a long history of corrupt rulings to defend the interests of the DC power structures, ruled today that USAO Jeanine Pirro is blocked from grand jury testimony surrounding alleged fraud perpetrated by the Federal Reserve Board. (The renovations of two buildings has increased $1.2 billion over the original estimate.)

Boasberg ruled that taxpayer funds used by the Federal Reserve to indulge themselves are exempt from investigative review. The ruling elite must never be challenged. USAO Jeanine Pirro is very angry.

https://www.youtube.com/live/8pZxpRtmb90?si=wJCMHPz61UdZYm3s
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

"I think most people on this board are generally good people outside the confines of OT."

Anyone that voted for Trump 3 times can still qualify as a good person provided that they are profoundly stupid.

Other than that, good f@ucking luck rationalizing. No one is buying it. I know guys that have and they are Triple Crown @$$holes in all aspects of their lives.



movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CBS reported today that Cuba had released 51 political prisoners as an outcome of pressure from the Trump administration.

Hours later, Communist Leader Miguel Daz Canel announces that the Cuban government has entered direct negotiations with the United States.

Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Welcome back, movielover! People have missed you on this board. How was the new software install?

Curious what you think about our new war!
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:


Welcome back, movielover! People have missed you on this board. How was the new software install?

Curious what you think about our new war!


Mixed feelings: not on my bingo card, but first chair for Bibi. It appears this was planned at least six months back. (See Putin's floating oil stash.)

This is no Venezuela or pinpr--k bombing run, it could drag out. But yes, a hotbed for terrorism no doubt. Will we run out of missiles?

Ghastly: two days into the SMO, former Israeli PM Bennett says "Turkey the new Iran." Turkey? *SMDH*
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

CBS reported today that Cuba had released 51 political prisoners as an outcome of pressure from the Trump administration.

Hours later, Communist Leader Miguel Daz Canel announces that the Cuban government has entered direct negotiations with the United States.

Welcome back to Paradise City.
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
> Breaking News: Investors in a deal to create a U.S.-controlled TikTok are set to pay a $10 billion transaction fee to the Trump administration.

well, it's their doe, so play it however they wanna. < looney toons imo >
sighned, not dead yet # funk trunk; i.c.e. too
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

bearister said:

"I think most people on this board are generally good people outside the confines of OT."

Anyone that voted for Trump 3 times can still qualify as a good person provided that they are profoundly stupid.

Other than that, good f@ucking luck rationalizing. No one is buying it. I know guys that have and they are Triple Crown @$$holes in all aspects of their lives.








"Trump has consistently attracted the support of a handful of left-wing activists and writers. Some of them were die-hard Bernie Sanders supporters who believed, much like the Weimar communists, that Trump would hasten the social crisis that would open the door for their revolution. A somewhat different faction on the left today believes electing Trump is a necessary price for punishing Joe Biden for his Zionism."
-Jonathan Chait


Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

"I think most people on this board are generally good people outside the confines of OT."

Anyone that voted for Trump 3 times can still qualify as a good person provided that they are profoundly stupid.

Other than that, good f@ucking luck rationalizing. No one is buying it. I know guys that have and they are Triple Crown @$$holes in all aspects of their lives.


You ignore a fundamental truth about American Presidential elections- voting against someone is the driving motive, not voting for someone
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:

bearister said:

"I think most people on this board are generally good people outside the confines of OT."

Anyone that voted for Trump 3 times can still qualify as a good person provided that they are profoundly stupid.

Other than that, good f@ucking luck rationalizing. No one is buying it. I know guys that have and they are Triple Crown @$$holes in all aspects of their lives.


You ignore a fundamental truth about American Presidential elections- voting against someone is the driving motive, not voting for someone

I didn't ignore it. "Voting against" is incorporated into "stupid" when it put Trump into office.

Yogi agrees with Matt Taibbi that voting under the "lesser of two evils" theory ends up electing Democratic candidates that move more and more to the right. They would rather see Trump blow up the system and pave the way for their ill defined revolution.

"The next little thing about this vote-for-the-lesser-evil trick, of course and this is no secret to anyone any more is that it drives all the "serious" candidates toward what is commonly referred to as the "moderate center," even if these serious candidates aren't, in fact, moderate or centrist in any meaningful sense and the so-called center moves further to the right with each election cycle. For nearly two decades now this process has been steadily advancing on the Democratic side, as liberals are trained to accept the idea that the national majority will never accept a true labor party, or any candidate perceived as "soft" on defense."
Matt Taibbi
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Anarchistbear said:

bearister said:

"I think most people on this board are generally good people outside the confines of OT."

Anyone that voted for Trump 3 times can still qualify as a good person provided that they are profoundly stupid.

Other than that, good f@ucking luck rationalizing. No one is buying it. I know guys that have and they are Triple Crown @$$holes in all aspects of their lives.


You ignore a fundamental truth about American Presidential elections- voting against someone is the driving motive, not voting for someone

I didn't ignore it. "Voting against" is incorporated into "stupid" when it put Trump into office.

Yogi agrees with Matt Taibbi that voting under the "lesser of two evils" theory ends up electing Democratic candidates that move more and more to the right. They would rather see Trump blow up the system and pave the way for their ill defined revolution.

"The next little thing about this vote-for-the-lesser-evil trick, of course and this is no secret to anyone any more is that it drives all the "serious" candidates toward what is commonly referred to as the "moderate center," even if these serious candidates aren't, in fact, moderate or centrist in any meaningful sense and the so-called center moves further to the right with each election cycle. For nearly two decades now this process has been steadily advancing on the Democratic side, as liberals are trained to accept the idea that the national majority will never accept a true labor party, or any candidate perceived as "soft" on defense."
Matt Taibbi



Voting for the lesser of two evils is not the answer. Not voting is better and is more likely
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:

Not voting is better

No, I think this is always the wrong answer.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not voting also puts Trump in office.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Not voting also puts Trump in office.


No
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Big C said:


Welcome back, movielover! People have missed you on this board. How was the new software install?

Curious what you think about our new war!


Mixed feelings: not on my bingo card, but first chair for Bibi. It appears this was planned at least six months back. (See Putin's floating oil stash.)

This is no Venezuela or pinpr--k bombing run, it could drag out. But yes, a hotbed for terrorism no doubt. Will we run out of missiles?

Ghastly: two days into the SMO, former Israeli PM Bennett says "Turkey the new Iran." Turkey? *SMDH*

And yet you don't feel played at all on Iran?
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Anarchistbear said:

bearister said:

"The next little thing about this vote-for-the-lesser-evil trick, of course and this is no secret to anyone any more is that it drives all the "serious" candidates toward what is commonly referred to as the "moderate center," even if these serious candidates aren't, in fact, moderate or centrist in any meaningful sense and the so-called center moves further to the right with each election cycle. For nearly two decades now this process has been steadily advancing on the Democratic side, as liberals are trained to accept the idea that the national majority will never accept a true labor party, or any candidate perceived as "soft" on defense."





I appreciate you making sure this quote gets seen as often as possible. It increases the possibility that a loyal Democrat voter will read it and realize its truth and step away from their self-destructive voting patterns.

Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Not voting also puts Trump in office.

Not our problem you Democrats keep nominating ****ty candidates.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

bearister said:

Not voting also puts Trump in office.

Not our problem you Democrats keep nominating ****ty candidates.


Says Bernie Sanders voters who voted for Trump.

https://www.npr.org/2017/08/24/545812242/1-in-10-sanders-primary-voters-ended-up-supporting-trump-survey-finds

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hillary jobbed Bernie.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump jobbed Sweaty Marco.

Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump jobbed Liz Cheney
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Newsom jobbed 40 million Californians.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

bearister said:

Not voting also puts Trump in office.

Not our problem you Democrats keep nominating ****ty candidates.

Have you been voting third-party lately?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

bearister said:

Not voting also puts Trump in office.

Not our problem you Democrats keep nominating ****ty candidates.

The Democrats run "sh@itty candidates" argument would be so much more compelling if the Republican POTUS wasn't this guy described by Matt Taibbi:

"Trump has already staked a claim to a role in history usually reserved for hereditary monarchs at the end of a line of inbreeding. Historians will list him somewhere between Vlad the Impaler and France's Charles VI, who thought his buttocks were made of glass."

…..and the likely next candidate the Republicans will run is the guy who has been walking around in oversized shoes:


…..and has panic attacks:


Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

bearister said:

Not voting also puts Trump in office.

Not our problem you Democrats keep nominating ****ty candidates.

Have you been voting third-party lately?

Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
At this rate, the Mexicans are going to build that wall themselves.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Big time rip


"We haven't seen anything like this since the fascists of World War II. This will lead to World War III or a massive, global economic catastrophe."
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The biggest risk, other than a global economic crisis, is Israel unilaterally nuking Iran, Pandora's box.
First Page Last Page
Page 180 of 186
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.