Official Trump / Vance Administration Thread

537,462 Views | 6459 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by dajo9
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

The biggest risk, other than a global economic crisis, is Israel unilaterally nuking Iran, Pandora's box.


I worry that retaliation is almost certainly baked in at this point. It's just a matter of when and where. It could be 10 years from now and when the next 9/11 or fireworks happens, we can remember to thank Mr. Trump.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

bearister said:

Not voting also puts Trump in office.

Not our problem you Democrats keep nominating ****ty candidates.

Have you been voting third-party lately?



So do you vote? If so, for whom?
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

bearister said:

Not voting also puts Trump in office.

Not our problem you Democrats keep nominating ****ty candidates.

Have you been voting third-party lately?



So do you vote? If so, for whom?

Someone thinks he's entitled to information he's not entitled to and keeps asking the same questions, not noticing that I never answer them.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:



Big time rip


"We haven't seen anything like this since the fascists of World War II. This will lead to World War III or a massive, global economic catastrophe."


Weird how that could happen with zero fascists in America
Censorship has always been a tool of the fascist
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
looking back / up there, wow, our garbage administration births a garbage thread
# for no apparent reason // lets call the whole thing off
sighned, not dead yet # funk trunk; i.c.e. too
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

bearister said:

Not voting also puts Trump in office.

Not our problem you Democrats keep nominating ****ty candidates.

Have you been voting third-party lately?



So do you vote? If so, for whom?

Someone thinks he's entitled to information he's not entitled to and keeps asking the same questions, not noticing that I never answer them.

Okay then.

You're very eager to talk about how bad the major parties are (fair enough), but I'm curious to know what you actually do support.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

At this rate, the Mexicans are going to build that wall themselves.


So Mexico is going to pay for the wall. That would be some 4d chess there
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Yes, bro, the writing was on the wall years ago, but you remained in Antioch to complain about gas prices in 2026?


How come you aren't fiercely attacking Trump for releasing 41% of our oil out of the SPR, like you did with Biden?
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
smh said:

looking back / up there, wow, our garbage administration births a garbage thread
# for no apparent reason // lets call the whole thing off


That word "off" reminds me of the French Revolution when they shouted "off with their…."
Oh, never mind. I can't remember the rest of it.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

At this rate, the Mexicans are going to build that wall themselves.




BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?








2026 Latest Election Polls and Political Insights | RealClearPolling
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And still doing better than Obama at this point of his second term.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

And still doing better than Obama at this point of his second term.


Nearly 3 years to go.
That's an awful long time.
That's why I refrain from playing "whataboutism".
As I've said before, midterms will be the real judge.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Except that's not a whataboutism. It's a comparison to past history.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:




President Trump again showed the games the UniParty play against us as Democrats imported 20 million new future welfare recipients:

- he closed the border within weeks with no new legislation
- he's building the Wall, which has helped border patrol
- Real Wages rose in term 1.0, and term 2.0
- dozens of uncovered scams have revealed Billions in fraud, much going to "immigrant" communities
- tariff revenue skyrocketed
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Except that's not a whataboutism. It's a comparison to past history.


Good to know that Barrack Obama is your measuring stick.
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

Except that's not a whataboutism. It's a comparison to past history.


Good to know that Barrack Obama is your measuring stick.

right? I noticed the same. Can you say Limbo?
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cal83dls79 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

Except that's not a whataboutism. It's a comparison to past history.


Good to know that Barrack Obama is your measuring stick.

right? I noticed the same. Can you say Limbo?


The "limbo" is a required dance in the GOP these days.

America First!
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

Except that's not a whataboutism. It's a comparison to past history.


Good to know that Barrack Obama is your measuring stick.



He's the golden goose of the left. Of course he's going to get used for comparison. Silly to think otherwise
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm sure Donald Trump is right on the verge of rebounding to Obama's level of popularity, a level he has never achieved across either term.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

I'm sure Donald Trump is right on the verge of rebounding to Obama's level of popularity, a level he has never achieved across either term.


Polls say otherwise
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

I'm sure Donald Trump is right on the verge of rebounding to Obama's level of popularity, a level he has never achieved across either term.


Polls say otherwise

I'm talking about the maximum level of popularity.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

I'm sure Donald Trump is right on the verge of rebounding to Obama's level of popularity, a level he has never achieved across either term.


Polls say otherwise

I'm talking about the maximum level of popularity.


Fair but social/media elements played their part in that
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

I'm sure Donald Trump is right on the verge of rebounding to Obama's level of popularity, a level he has never achieved across either term.



Its truly revealing that this is the yardstick that is being used. The mental gymnastics on display here are second to none.
Let me know when they use Bill Clinton.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

sycasey said:

I'm sure Donald Trump is right on the verge of rebounding to Obama's level of popularity, a level he has never achieved across either term.



Its truly revealing that this is the yardstick that is being used. The mental gymnastics on display here are second to none. Let me know when they use Bill Clinton.



When Trump sleeps with an intern, I'll be sure to
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

sycasey said:

I'm sure Donald Trump is right on the verge of rebounding to Obama's level of popularity, a level he has never achieved across either term.



Its truly revealing that this is the yardstick that is being used. The mental gymnastics on display here are second to none. Let me know when they use Bill Clinton.



When Trump sleeps with an intern, I'll be sure to


No one cared about that.
Except for Jimmy Swaggart and Faux News.

sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

I'm sure Donald Trump is right on the verge of rebounding to Obama's level of popularity, a level he has never achieved across either term.


Polls say otherwise

I'm talking about the maximum level of popularity.


Fair but social/media elements played their part in that

They do for every President.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

sycasey said:

I'm sure Donald Trump is right on the verge of rebounding to Obama's level of popularity, a level he has never achieved across either term.



Its truly revealing that this is the yardstick that is being used. The mental gymnastics on display here are second to none. Let me know when they use Bill Clinton.



When Trump sleeps with an intern, I'll be sure to


No one cared about that.
Except for Jimmy Swaggart and Faux News.




Sounds like we got a revisionist in here
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

I'm sure Donald Trump is right on the verge of rebounding to Obama's level of popularity, a level he has never achieved across either term.


Polls say otherwise

I'm talking about the maximum level of popularity.


Fair but social/media elements played their part in that

They do for every President.


Yes but you can't honestly say Obama's wasn't different. Trump isn't helped by the media in the same way our neighborhood democrat presidents are. Trump also isn't black
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

bearister said:

Not voting also puts Trump in office.

Not our problem you Democrats keep nominating ****ty candidates.

Have you been voting third-party lately?



So do you vote? If so, for whom?

Someone thinks he's entitled to information he's not entitled to and keeps asking the same questions, not noticing that I never answer them.

Okay then.

You're very eager to talk about how bad the major parties are (fair enough), but I'm curious to know what you actually do support.

I support disbanding NATO, getting rid of a large amount of American foreign military bases, passing Medicare For All, passing a wealth tax on billionaires, reducing income tax on low income families and individuals, severely restricting AI, investing heavily in energy research, increasing government subsidies for education, a national strategy to address homelessness, strong border control, speeding up the process for legal immigration, disbanding the DHS, CIA and FBI which are thoroughly corrupt and need to be replaced with something starting from scratch, stronger speech protections, overturning Citizens United, drastically reducing military spending.

I think that's more than enough for you.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree with Trump here.

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

Except that's not a whataboutism. It's a comparison to past history.


Good to know that Barrack Obama is your measuring stick.



He's the golden goose of the left. Of course he's going to get used for comparison. Silly to think otherwise


You couldn't be more wrong.
Bill Clinton would be the Golden Goose.

Here, let me help you understand why.

Clinton balanced the budget. Four consecutive years of surplus.
The only President in my lifetime going back to the 60's to do so.

There was no budget deficit.
There was a surplus each year.

  • FY 2001: $128 billion surplus
  • FY 2000: $236 billion surplus
  • FY 1999: $126 billion surplus
  • FY 1998: $69 billion surplus


U.S. Budget Deficit by President


DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let's face it, Trump turned his back on a balanced budget and MAGA.

What he sold his base on for many years . . . is a LIE.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

Except that's not a whataboutism. It's a comparison to past history.


Good to know that Barrack Obama is your measuring stick.



He's the golden goose of the left. Of course he's going to get used for comparison. Silly to think otherwise


You couldn't be more wrong.
Bill Clinton would be the Golden Goose.

Here, let me help you understand why.

Clinton balanced the budget. Four consecutive years of surplus.
The only President in my lifetime going back to the 60's to do so.

There was no budget deficit.
There was a surplus each year.

  • FY 2001: $128 billion surplus
  • FY 2000: $236 billion surplus
  • FY 1999: $126 billion surplus
  • FY 1998: $69 billion surplus


U.S. Budget Deficit by President




Thank Ross Perot, Newt Gingrich, the Contract with America, and the Internet.

Heritage Foundation: "Decades from now, historians quite likely will reflect back upon the Contract With America as one of the most significant developments in the political history of the United States. As Newt Gingrich, the first Republican Speaker of the House of Representatives in 40 years, has written: "there is no comparable congressional document in our two-hundred-year history."

"Never before had so detailed a document become such an integral part of a congressional election campaign; never had so many innovative ideas been drafted into legislation so quickly; and never in the previous six decades had so much legislation been passed by the House of Representatives in less than 100 days after the newly elected Members of Congress took office. As the chief political columnist for The New York Times, R. W. Apple, wrote in a front page news analysis: "Perhaps not since the start of the New Deal [in 1932], to which many of the programs now under attack can trace their origins, has Congress moved with such speed on so many fronts." "

https://www.heritage.org/political-process/report/the-contract-america-implementing-new-ideas-the-us
First Page Last Page
Page 181 of 185
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.