Official Trump / Vance Administration Thread

537,016 Views | 6454 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by DiabloWags
bearister
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:43p, 3/31/26
Fresh in from the Be Careful What You Wish for Department:

Federal Judge Approves Trump Effort to Obtain List of Jews From Penn
The government's effort to collect the names and phone numbers of Jewish people on campus as it investigates antisemitism has upset some people who worry about how the information will be used.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/31/us/politics/trump-jews-penn-list-judge.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20260331&instance_id=173377&nl=breaking-news®i_id=73910054&segment_id=217539&user_id=ad18fc4e6f33bfafb338c4c822d93cea
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Reply Quote
2
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cal83dls79 • 3:13p, 3/31/26
cal83dls79 said:


Are the Democrats upset over what's being built under the ballroom and what it's connecting to?
Reply Quote
1
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 3:21p, 3/31/26
DiabloWags said:
MORE WINNING!


Rogue U.S. judge halting a privately funded project mid construction?
Reply Quote
2
Eastern Oregon Bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 4:14p, 3/31/26
PAC-10-BEAR said:
DiabloWags said:
MORE WINNING!


Rogue U.S. judge halting a privately funded project mid construction?
The public has a compelling interest when it comes to the White House. This isn't some golf course or a street corner in Manhattan.
Reply Quote
1
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Eastern Oregon Bear • 4:29p, 3/31/26
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
DiabloWags said:
MORE WINNING!


Rogue U.S. judge halting a privately funded project mid construction?

The public has a compelling interest when it comes to the White House. This isn't some golf course or a street corner in Manhattan.


There is a compelling portrait of Joe Biden hanging in the Trump White House.
Reply Quote
2
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 5:28p, 3/31/26
DiabloWags said:
MORE WINNING!



Looks out of scale. The gold leaf is easy to tone down after he leaves. Not sure why the need to hold almost 1,000 people. Try 600-700, reduce the height and sheer size.
Reply Quote
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 10:28p, 3/31/26
PAC-10-BEAR said:
DiabloWags said:
MORE WINNING!


Rogue U.S. judge halting a privately funded project mid construction?


The President has executive authority over the White House and because no public funds are being used, this will get tossed out and Trump can continue building his mega ballroom. Another liberal judge throwing spaghetti at the wall and seeing if it'll stick
Reply Quote
2
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:45a, 4/1/26
Reply Quote
1
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:33a
Reply Quote
1
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 7:58a
Cal88 said:

Pedantic point, but . . . I don't think Netanyahu is a President.
Reply Quote
1
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 8:15a
sycasey said:
Cal88 said:

Pedantic point, but . . . I don't think Netanyahu is a President.


Not sure if it's just an oversight on Mearsheimer's part or a pointed remark about the influence of Netanyahu over Trump...
Reply Quote
1
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:02p
This will be a winning midterm message:

Reply Quote
5
smh
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 4:05p
sycasey said:
This will be a winning midterm message

yeahbut, no. surprised at the lack of any /S headsup
# just desert first
Reply Quote
1 edit
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 5:43p
sycasey said:
This will be a winning midterm message:


The Democrat version of this is "We would do all of this if it wasn't for that damn parliamentarian."

Meanwhile, they are signing bombs for Israel and sending all of our money to Ukraine.
Reply Quote
1
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aunburdened • 8:33p
Aunburdened said:
sycasey said:
This will be a winning midterm message:


The Democrat version of this is "We would do all of this if it wasn't for that damn parliamentarian."

Meanwhile, they are signing bombs for Israel and sending all of our money to Ukraine.

How do you think the spending for our aid to Ukraine compares to the current war in Iran?

The real answer for why Dems were limited in what they can pass was having a very slim majority and thus being hamstrung by what Manchin/Sinema would support. Kind of similar to why Republicans find it hard to pass anything now.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 8:48p
sycasey said:
Aunburdened said:
sycasey said:
This will be a winning midterm message:


The Democrat version of this is "We would do all of this if it wasn't for that damn parliamentarian."

Meanwhile, they are signing bombs for Israel and sending all of our money to Ukraine.

How do you think the spending for our aid to Ukraine compares to the current war in Iran?

The real answer for why Dems were limited in what they can pass was having a very slim majority and thus being hamstrung by what Manchin/Sinema would support. Kind of similar to why Republicans find it hard to pass anything now.


Well said.
Reply Quote
First Page Refresh
Page 185 of 185 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.