DiabloWags said:
oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
Of course, you are free to do your own research.
It's up to you whether you want to provide more information than the article has presented.
Or, perhaps you are content with criticizing it and offering no answer yourself.
I've provided a few links if you're interested.
Thanks.
I already thanked you for the links. I also thank you for once again being wrong here, although you will never admit it. Your reply had a major reading comprehension issue.
That was your interpretation and it was not based in Fact.
I'm sorry that I tried engaging in a good faith discussion with you by providing additional links.
Have a nice day.
I appreciate the links as I have already said twice. If you were engaging in a good faith discussion with me, you would admit your retort to me was factually incorrect, which is based off of one of two things:
1) you were arguing in deliberate bad faith; or
2) you made a mistake because of poor reading comprehension.
Which is it Wags?
