Iran could retaliate by launching drones at the West Coast

1,121 Views | 29 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by PAC-10-BEAR
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We recently acquired information that as of early February 2026, Iran allegedly aspired to conduct a surprise attack using unmanned aerial vehicles from an unidentified vessel off the coast of the United State Homeland, specifically against unspecified targets in California, in the event that the US conducted strikes against Iran," according to the alert distributed at the end of February. "We have no additional information on the timing, method, target, or perpetrators of this alleged attack…….

U.S. intelligence officials have also grown concerned in recent months about the expanding use of drones by Mexican drug cartels and the chance the technology could be used to attack American forces and personnel near the Mexican border."



*I'm very relieved to see that War a Lago is free from this threat. An Iranian incoming can really f@uck up the greens. Trump would be happy to see California under attack.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't think Iran is interested in having a tactical nuclear weapon used on them.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:

I don't think Iran is interested in having a tactical nuclear weapon used on them.

As long as it is limited to California, it could end up as a provision of the peace plan.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Anarchistbear said:

I don't think Iran is interested in having a tactical nuclear weapon used on them.

As long as it is limited to California, it could end up as a provision of the peace plan.


BINGO.

Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Anarchistbear said:

I don't think Iran is interested in having a tactical nuclear weapon used on them.

As long as it is limited to California, it could end up as a provision of the peace plan.

Red states: "What's a few less fruits and nuts? I'm actually starting to like Iran a little bit!"
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It actually brings up an interesting point (how about THAT for putting my social science hat on). I think the attacks on Persian Gulf oil infrastructure will not create a backlash against Iran. But directly attacking the homeland (drone strike on Disneyland anyone) would lead to a Pearl Harbor like response and backfire. American's are strange that way.
Take care of your Chicken
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

"We recently acquired information that as of early February 2026, Iran allegedly aspired to conduct a surprise attack using unmanned aerial vehicles from an unidentified vessel off the coast of the United State Homeland, specifically against unspecified targets in California, in the event that the US conducted strikes against Iran," according to the alert distributed at the end of February. "We have no additional information on the timing, method, target, or perpetrators of this alleged attack…….

U.S. intelligence officials have also grown concerned in recent months about the expanding use of drones by Mexican drug cartels and the chance the technology could be used to attack American forces and personnel near the Mexican border."



*I'm very relieved to see that War a Lago is free from this threat. An Iranian incoming can really f@uck up the greens. Trump would be happy to see California under attack.



Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


They are all in Minnesota
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:



They are all in Minnesota

Off the west coast of Minnesota, that is
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

Anarchistbear said:



They are all in Minnesota

Off the west coast of Minnesota, that is


Take out the Dakotas now
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump's personal FBI shepherded by Cash Patel is in it to win it. The Realm is secure.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:

Aunburdened said:

Anarchistbear said:



They are all in Minnesota

Off the west coast of Minnesota, that is


Take out the Dakotas now


Are you calling Noem a sleeper cell?
I guess that was it all along.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Iran could retaliate by launching drones at the West Coast

concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Quote:

Iran could retaliate by launching drones at the West Coast




A similar veined line could be:
Trump finds the process of aging so distasteful he's trying to get himself killed by "enemies" so as to die a martyr.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump probably finds the idea of getting 72 virgins after martyrdom appealing.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Trump probably finds the idea of getting 72 virgins after martyrdom appealing.


Wouldn't most men?
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Trump probably finds the idea of getting 72 virgins after martyrdom appealing.


Wouldn't most men?


I don't have the energy anymore to train 72 women to do things properly
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

BearlySane88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Trump probably finds the idea of getting 72 virgins after martyrdom appealing.


Wouldn't most men?


I don't have the energy anymore to train 72 women to do things properly


I prefer my escapades to be experts
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Aunburdened said:

BearlySane88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Trump probably finds the idea of getting 72 virgins after martyrdom appealing.


Wouldn't most men?


I don't have the energy anymore to train 72 women to do things properly


I prefer my escapades to be experts



and prostitutes can be cheaper than wives.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Aunburdened said:

BearlySane88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Trump probably finds the idea of getting 72 virgins after martyrdom appealing.


Wouldn't most men?


I don't have the energy anymore to train 72 women to do things properly


I prefer my escapades to be experts



and prostitutes can be cheaper than wives.
You shouldn't shop for prostitutes in the Tenderloin.
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Aunburdened said:

BearlySane88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Trump probably finds the idea of getting 72 virgins after martyrdom appealing.


Wouldn't most men?


I don't have the energy anymore to train 72 women to do things properly


I prefer my escapades to be experts



and prostitutes can be cheaper than wives.
You shouldn't shop for prostitutes in the Tenderloin.


I prefer to do it at Davos with all the influencial world leaders
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Trump probably finds the idea of getting 72 virgins after martyrdom appealing.

We should remind him of the incentive to break out the convertible.

concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Aunburdened said:

BearlySane88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Trump probably finds the idea of getting 72 virgins after martyrdom appealing.


Wouldn't most men?


I don't have the energy anymore to train 72 women to do things properly


I prefer my escapades to be experts



and prostitutes can be cheaper than wives.
You shouldn't shop for prostitutes in the Tenderloin.


I prefer to do it at Davos with all the influencial world leaders


I think she was covertly offering you.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Iran could retaliate by launching drones at the West Coast

These are the terrific Californians who would save us:

Gavin Newsom
Nancy Pelosi
Adam Schiff
Alex Padilla
Ro Kahanna
Maxine Waters
Ted Lieu
Eric Swalwell
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Quote:

Iran could retaliate by launching drones at the West Coast

These are the terrific Californians who would save us:

Gavin Newsom
Nancy Pelosi
Adam Schiff
Alex Padilla
Ro Kahanna
Maxine Waters
Ted Lieu
Eric Swalwell


That's a good lineup. Much better than the MAGA creatures that created this danger.
Censorship has always been a tool of the fascist
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Quote:

Iran could retaliate by launching drones at the West Coast

These are the terrific Californians who would save us:

Gavin Newsom
Nancy Pelosi
Adam Schiff
Alex Padilla
Ro Kahanna
Maxine Waters
Ted Lieu
Eric Swalwell


That's a good lineup. Much better than the MAGA creatures that created this danger.


Bahahahahahahaha.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Quote:

Iran could retaliate by launching drones at the West Coast

These are the terrific Californians who would save us:

Gavin Newsom
Nancy Pelosi
Adam Schiff
Alex Padilla
Ro Kahanna
Maxine Waters
Ted Lieu
Eric Swalwell


That's a good lineup. Much better than the MAGA creatures that created this danger.


Bahahahahahahaha.


You think compromised establishment GOPers like Tom Cotton Candy and Lady Lindsay are more reliable parties?

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Quote:

Iran could retaliate by launching drones at the West Coast

These are the terrific Californians who would save us:

Gavin Newsom
Nancy Pelosi
Adam Schiff
Alex Padilla
Ro Kahanna
Maxine Waters
Ted Lieu
Eric Swalwell


That's a good lineup. Much better than the MAGA creatures that created this danger.


Bahahahahahahaha.


You think compromised establishment GOPers like Tom Cotton Candy and Lady Lindsay are more reliable parties?




No I think they all suck. I've said this many times.
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Quote:

Iran could retaliate by launching drones at the West Coast

These are the terrific Californians who would save us:

Gavin Newsom
Nancy Pelosi
Adam Schiff
Alex Padilla
Ro Kahanna
Maxine Waters
Ted Lieu
Eric Swalwell


That's a good lineup. Much better than the MAGA creatures that created this danger.

PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Quote:

Iran could retaliate by launching drones at the West Coast

These are the terrific Californians who would save us:

Gavin Newsom
Nancy Pelosi
Adam Schiff
Alex Padilla
Ro Kahanna
Maxine Waters
Ted Lieu
Eric Swalwell


That's a good lineup. Much better than the MAGA creatures that created this danger.

Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.