chazzed said:

---

Republicans profess their support for the right to peacefully assemble...until the masses do so against a historically unpopular GOP president. Then they push Antifa and paid protestor nonsense.

---

Those wearing masks and dressed in all black are Antifa.

The 70-year old white women holding signs are the paid protestors.

Aunburdened said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

Stop spamming the board with Gandhi ****

---

Just stop spamming the board with any of his crap

---

You guys are funny.
I submit a few high minded thoughts about a famous leader and you guys throw a fit.

Don't bother being inspired by anyone, or try to improve what you put out into the world, or for yourself.

My posts about Gandhi were as much as for myself as for anyone. In fact, most of what I type is for my own mental processing.

I suppose anyone on an anonymous forum is doing the same, self processing what's in their own head.

Justice for the Gays of Hormuz pic.twitter.com/73SFJr5dBD

— Geiger Capital (@Geiger_Capital) March 30, 2026

NO KINGS

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

Justice for the Gays of Hormuz pic.twitter.com/73SFJr5dBD

— Geiger Capital (@Geiger_Capital) March 30, 2026

NO KINGS

---

More folks who will probably be "disenfranchised" because they won't be able to figure out voter id.

Aunburdened said:

---

---

Murder Porn Alert
at 3:38 to 4:14.

Anarchistbear said:

---

concordtom said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

Stop spamming the board with Gandhi ****

---

Just stop spamming the board with any of his crap

---

You guys are funny.
I submit a few high minded thoughts about a famous leader and you guys throw a fit.

Don't bother being inspired by anyone, or try to improve what you put out into the world, or for yourself.

My posts about Gandhi were as much as for myself as for anyone. In fact, most of what I type is for my own mental processing.

I suppose anyone on an anonymous forum is doing the same, self processing what's in their own head.

---

High minded thoughts about Gandhi along with the usual Trump murder porn. Thought the Gandhi was a joke, the murder porn being your signature

---

It was your buddy who posted this, not me.
I've stated many times, murder is wrong.

concordtom said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

---

Murder Porn Alert
at 3:38 to 4:14.

---

"But you believe in the non-violence"

concordtom said:

---

---

They should have added:

-Don't speak about specific issues, like stopping the war in Iran, releasing the Epstein files, and holding Democrats who are by and large as compliant to the MIC and AIPAC responsible, just keep this whole protest as nebulous and vague as possible.

sycasey said:

---

Except it's pretty obvious that people at these protests have talked about those things.

---

I think they've also talked about how Trump raped that woman in the department store.

And cheated on all three of his wives, had sexual with at least one porn star, playboy bunny, and hundreds of sexual partners in his life, likely, if not thousands.
And how the 70's sex scene was his personal Vietnam.

Yet, voters keep voting for him.
I suppose anything goes, including the coming retaliatory explosions on US soil.

Thank you, Mr Trump.
Thank you, voters.
Thank you, Putin.

So I haven't participated in any of this No Kings stuff, but early in the first Trump term I was involved with creating a local group for Indivisible, and I know that the Indivisible people do a lot of the national coordination for No Kings too. I haven't been involved in that group for many years, so maybe it's changed but I'll speak to my experience with them:

The national messaging for Indivisible/No Kings is intentionally very broad and vague, because they want the local groups to tailor the message to whatever they think works for their local communities. If you're in San Francisco you can probably be as safely lefty as you want and go full pro-Palestine, pro-trans, etc. But a No Kings organizer in Boise, Idaho might want to have a more moderate message that pulls in more participants in a more conservative area. They want to leave that up to them, so the national guidance will not name a lot of specific policies to trumpet. Some people want to point this out as a fault of the movement, but it is very much a feature and not a bug.

Aunburdened said:

---

sycasey said:

---

So I haven't participated in any of this No Kings stuff, but early in the first Trump term I was involved with creating a local group for Indivisible, and I know that the Indivisible people do a lot of the national coordination for No Kings too. I haven't been involved in that group for many years, so maybe it's changed but I'll speak to my experience with them:

The national messaging for Indivisible/No Kings is intentionally very broad and vague, because they want the local groups to tailor the message to whatever they think works for their local communities. If you're in San Francisco you can probably be as safely lefty as you want and go full pro-Palestine, pro-trans, etc. But a No Kings organizer in Boise, Idaho might want to have a more moderate message that pulls in more participants in a more conservative area. They want to leave that up to them, so the national guidance will not name a lot of specific policies to trumpet. Some people want to point this out as a fault of the movement, but it is very much a feature and not a bug.

---

That's because it's a recruitment tool for the Democratic Party and not a protest.

---

Indivisible makes no real secret of that: they want to elect more Democrats.

sycasey said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

sycasey said:

---

So I haven't participated in any of this No Kings stuff, but early in the first Trump term I was involved with creating a local group for Indivisible, and I know that the Indivisible people do a lot of the national coordination for No Kings too. I haven't been involved in that group for many years, so maybe it's changed but I'll speak to my experience with them:

The national messaging for Indivisible/No Kings is intentionally very broad and vague, because they want the local groups to tailor the message to whatever they think works for their local communities. If you're in San Francisco you can probably be as safely lefty as you want and go full pro-Palestine, pro-trans, etc. But a No Kings organizer in Boise, Idaho might want to have a more moderate message that pulls in more participants in a more conservative area. They want to leave that up to them, so the national guidance will not name a lot of specific policies to trumpet. Some people want to point this out as a fault of the movement, but it is very much a feature and not a bug.

---

That's because it's a recruitment tool for the Democratic Party and not a protest.

---

Indivisible makes no real secret of that: they want to elect more Democrats.

---

Now all you have to do is just take that final step and admit what everyone else knows, but you are too proud to admit

Aunburdened said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

sycasey said:

---

So I haven't participated in any of this No Kings stuff, but early in the first Trump term I was involved with creating a local group for Indivisible, and I know that the Indivisible people do a lot of the national coordination for No Kings too. I haven't been involved in that group for many years, so maybe it's changed but I'll speak to my experience with them:

The national messaging for Indivisible/No Kings is intentionally very broad and vague, because they want the local groups to tailor the message to whatever they think works for their local communities. If you're in San Francisco you can probably be as safely lefty as you want and go full pro-Palestine, pro-trans, etc. But a No Kings organizer in Boise, Idaho might want to have a more moderate message that pulls in more participants in a more conservative area. They want to leave that up to them, so the national guidance will not name a lot of specific policies to trumpet. Some people want to point this out as a fault of the movement, but it is very much a feature and not a bug.

---

That's because it's a recruitment tool for the Democratic Party and not a protest.

---

Indivisible makes no real secret of that: they want to elect more Democrats.

---

Now all you have to do is just take that final step and admit what everyone else knows, but you are too proud to admit

---

Huh?

Everywhere.

But the big organized liberal groups that people might expect to organize big rallies, are controlled by the Democratic Party, aka Zionists. They support the war. So the mass SMS calls to protest do not go out. The right-War Party then pretends no one really minds. https://t.co/cp7pDwQKNF

— Scott Horton (@scotthortonshow) April 2, 2026

I really don't think the No Kings/Indivisible people are pro-war.

What's wrong with calling it the We Hate Trump coalition?
Seems pretty accurate to me.

sycasey said:

---

I really don't think the No Kings/Indivisible people are pro-war.

---

if the Democratic party wants to "reinvent" its approach to US foreign policy — but their leaders keep refusing to acknowledge their role in building & maintaining America's murderous war machine — then that project should be understood as fundamentally unserious & doomed to fail https://t.co/jqfISuXdMw

— Alex JER-dun (@alexjordanATL) April 2, 2026

Aunburdened said:

---

sycasey said:

---

I really don't think the No Kings/Indivisible people are pro-war.

---

if the Democratic party wants to "reinvent" its approach to US foreign policy — but their leaders keep refusing to acknowledge their role in building & maintaining America's murderous war machine — then that project should be understood as fundamentally unserious & doomed to fail https://t.co/jqfISuXdMw

— Alex JER-dun (@alexjordanATL) April 2, 2026

---

Yes, I agree that many of the Democratic politicians are making a bad call here. That's not necessarily the fault of No Kings though.