tequila4kapp said:
Thank you for providing a list.
I am SO not interested in defending that list or getting into an argument. I am asking honest questions to understand how this isn't just TDS/anti-Republicanism, etc.
Here is my question: How do you level this list with the instances where the Biden Admin ignored/circumvented court orders (Title 9, student loans, CDC eviction moratorium, etc.)? The Democratic party rigging primaries to benefit one candidate (HRC) over another (Bernie)? The Democratic party booting a duly nominated candidate - who was also the sitting President - because they believed he could not win? (if they really thought he was incapable of doing the job they would have 25th Amendment-ed him). The Democratic party hand selecting a replacement candidate without any electoral process?
How are those actions any better or different? Were they not "King-like" in that centralized authority circumvented inconveniences to their ruling objective where those inconveniences were clearly rooted in democratic and rule of law principles?
Wow. I'm initially a bit flabbergasted at your post because it seems that your attention goes immediately away from how outrageous the list is and instead focuses on who I perceive your opponent to be: "Democrats".
It's like if a kid gets caught doing something wrong instead of feeling shame for their transgressions (stealing cookies, kicking the nerd, graffiti) they proclaim that other kids were doing it and didn't get caught/in trouble.
I think we must first be noble, call a horse a horse.
So, to swallow my own medicine, I will therefore first address your turnabout or in-kind accusations:
How do you level this list with the instances where the Biden Admin ignored/circumvented court orders (Title 9, student loans, CDC eviction moratorium, etc.)?I don't actually know what you are talking about.
The Democratic party rigging primaries to benefit one candidate (HRC) over another (Bernie)? Rigging?
I would have to understand what rigging you are referring to. Is this the superdelegate issue? Yes, I recall something that didn't seem fair regarding superdelegates. But again, getting me up to speed takes time, is a rabbit hole. I'm willing to go there provided we agree that both sides look equally at all complaints. If kid A gets examined then kid B (the TDS list gets addressed, rather than be distracted away).
The Democratic party booting a duly nominated candidate - who was also the sitting President - because they believed he could not win? (if they really thought he was incapable of doing the job they would have 25th Amendment-ed him). The Democratic party hand selecting a replacement candidate without any electoral process?Okay, I can speak to this issue. I would have preferred a full primary. But let me break it down into two time periods:
Period A, before his disastrous debate:
It's an interesting thing, which I've railed against, and which 240 years ago was cautioned against, how both parties end up eroding democracy, as power is controlled within the party structures and by the powerful people at the top who set the agenda at the parties.
This is witnessed by how all members of Congress vote along partisan lines, by how individual politicians choose not to run against a sitting president, etc.
So, the design of our electoral process is flawed, in a multitude of ways. To rip on "Democrats" because Biden initially went unopposed is a bit farcical, because it's simply common practice everywhere every time. Yes, it's wrong, I agree, but let's not think that suddenly "The Democrats" are dealing from the bottom of the deck as sneaky cheats.
Period B, after the disastrous debate:
What else would you have liked to see happen? I would think you'd approve that the Party did indeed do the right thing in terms of convincing Biden to step back from running.
Second, I think you should realize that for a very long portion of US history, the party nominees were not "elected" by voters but chosen by insiders. Do your research on that!
Third, yes, some newspaper op-eds and some political voices suggested a quick national vote with top 3-5 candidates. I would have preferred that. But it was scramble time, late in the clock, and it didn't happen. But don't lose your cookies - what if Biden had suddenly died, what did you want? What remedy do you propose??
I think what's happening here is that your student has literally killed people and you are ignoring that and saying cookies were stolen. It's truly outrageous, your redirection.
How are those actions any better or different? Were they not "King-like" in that centralized authority circumvented inconveniences to their ruling objective where those inconveniences were clearly rooted in democratic and rule of law principles?Yes, both parties control power as kings, and they take turns.
I had a class in college (in DC) where we focused on the party structures. They control who/what gets on state ballots. Their candidates automatically get on every ballot. Third parties require signatures, and it's a pain.
Ranked choice voting is a good solution, but there are so many built in advantages, I can't even remember them all. The two parties have structured things to form a duopoly, and they pawn it off as "democracy".
If they truly wanted "democracy" they would open power sharing by more party groups.
And I must also say that there is a massive undemocratic thing about how money buys marketing buys votes buys candidates who therefore are beholden to the moneyed donors - this is why Citizens United is such a problem!
In summary, I would suggest that the problems YOU point to are primarily problems with the system, which impacts all players in both parties. I do not deny it and I'd like to change it.
But my outrage is that Trump is singularly psycho and must be stopped.
Perhaps you'll be able to confess your inner disgust of him. I do not particularly understand the hesitation to do so. I think it is rooted in base partisanship. Tribalism. It would be hard to root for a great athlete/guy if he wore a Stanford shirt. We evolved with Us/Them minds and they live inside us today.