🚨Biden Autopen Pardons on VACATION?🚨

Who is behind this autopen on 12/30/2022 that pardoned six criminals (with the exact same autopen signature) while Joe Biden was vacationing and golfing in the U.S. Virgin Islands?

Note they all say they are "Signed in the City of… https://t.co/b0SEtalm4N pic.twitter.com/dN7BbVOiVj

— Oversight Project (@ItsYourGov) March 10, 2025

@ItsYourGov: There are an estimated 339,000 non-citizens living in Georgia.

If the 14% proportion holds true state wide, this would equate to over 47,000 registered non-citizens.

For context, Joe Biden "won" the state of Georgia by less than 12,000 votes in 2020.'

There are an estimated 339,000 non-citizens living in Georgia.

If the 14% proportion holds true state wide, this would equate to over 47,000 registered non-citizens.

For context, Joe Biden "won" the state of Georgia by less than 12,000 votes in 2020.'

— Oversight Project (@ItsYourGov) July 31, 2024

bearister said:

---

Vaccines Are Helping Older People More Than We Knew

---

Not based on my reading of this board.

movielover said:

---

@ItsYourGov: There are an estimated 339,000 non-citizens living in Georgia.

If the 14% proportion holds true state wide, this would equate to over 47,000 registered non-citizens.

For context, Joe Biden "won" the state of Georgia by less than 12,000 votes in 2020.'

There are an estimated 339,000 non-citizens living in Georgia.

If the 14% proportion holds true state wide, this would equate to over 47,000 registered non-citizens.

For context, Joe Biden "won" the state of Georgia by less than 12,000 votes in 2020.'

— Oversight Project (@ItsYourGov) July 31, 2024

---

So it's not such a small amount that it doesn't matter. Sycasey what's your take?

Whoops coordinated.

🚨SECRET BLUE STATE RESISTANCE AGREEMENT OBTAINED - BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP🚨

We have obtained a secret agreement between 22 blue states, DC, and San Francisco, signed beginning on November 8, 2024. This agreement, just 3 days after President Trump's landslide election win,… pic.twitter.com/7AsqgCjlcX

— Oversight Project (@ItsYourGov) February 11, 2025

🚨Election Integrity Under Attack - Undercover Video

Illegal Alien "Charity" Distributing Fraudulent Papers Exposed

In Queens, New York, the organization La Jornada provides services to illegal aliens

The Oversight Project obtained video from @realmuckraker discovering a… pic.twitter.com/FOIDDn28jy

— Oversight Project (@ItsYourGov) March 20, 2024

Perhaps you should take your anecdotal "proof" somewhere that can make a difference and get things changed. Hmmm... maybe the courts? Of course, that hasn't worked out too well for you guys and your anecdotal "proof" in the past.

If I was a non citizen and some biased "citizen journalist" yo-yo was badgering me about whether or not I was registered to vote, I'd probably say yes just to tick them off.

movielover said:

---

Return the stolen land!

---

Billie Eilish needs to make the first move and return stolen property before she lectures everyone else. Then we'll all be convinced to do the same....: )

BearlySane88 said:

---

movielover said:

---

@ItsYourGov: There are an estimated 339,000 non-citizens living in Georgia.

If the 14% proportion holds true state wide, this would equate to over 47,000 registered non-citizens.

For context, Joe Biden "won" the state of Georgia by less than 12,000 votes in 2020.'

There are an estimated 339,000 non-citizens living in Georgia.

If the 14% proportion holds true state wide, this would equate to over 47,000 registered non-citizens.

For context, Joe Biden "won" the state of Georgia by less than 12,000 votes in 2020.'

— Oversight Project (@ItsYourGov) July 31, 2024

---

So it's not such a small amount that it doesn't matter. Sycasey what's your take?

---

I don't consider anecdotal evidence from Twitter randos.

sycasey said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

movielover said:

---

@ItsYourGov: There are an estimated 339,000 non-citizens living in Georgia.

If the 14% proportion holds true state wide, this would equate to over 47,000 registered non-citizens.

For context, Joe Biden "won" the state of Georgia by less than 12,000 votes in 2020.'

There are an estimated 339,000 non-citizens living in Georgia.

If the 14% proportion holds true state wide, this would equate to over 47,000 registered non-citizens.

For context, Joe Biden "won" the state of Georgia by less than 12,000 votes in 2020.'

— Oversight Project (@ItsYourGov) July 31, 2024

---

So it's not such a small amount that it doesn't matter. Sycasey what's your take?

---

I don't consider anecdotal evidence from Twitter randos.

---

He's not just any Twitter Rando, he's a "Citizen Journalist". I must be a Citizen Journalist too since I have the same qualifications.

So many of our journos are corrupt.

Look at the interview with Epstein where he blamed Bill Clinton for the 2008 housing implosion.

60 Minutes (?) Jouno: 'So you're blaming black, brown, and white working people?"

Epstein: 'No, I didn't say that. I blamed Bill Clinton."

The Trump team can't get its story straight on the president, Gabbard and Fulton County

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

sycasey said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

movielover said:

---

@ItsYourGov: There are an estimated 339,000 non-citizens living in Georgia.

If the 14% proportion holds true state wide, this would equate to over 47,000 registered non-citizens.

For context, Joe Biden "won" the state of Georgia by less than 12,000 votes in 2020.'

There are an estimated 339,000 non-citizens living in Georgia.

If the 14% proportion holds true state wide, this would equate to over 47,000 registered non-citizens.

For context, Joe Biden "won" the state of Georgia by less than 12,000 votes in 2020.'

— Oversight Project (@ItsYourGov) July 31, 2024

---

So it's not such a small amount that it doesn't matter. Sycasey what's your take?

---

I don't consider anecdotal evidence from Twitter randos.

---

He's not just any Twitter Rando, he's a "Citizen Journalist". I must be a Citizen Journalist too since I have the same qualifications.

---

So here's from further down the same Twitter thread:

We attempted to locate these individuals on GA voter rolls and were unable to find them.

Non-citizens have shoddy address history records and often use fake documents and names.

It is unclear exactly what information these individuals gave when registering to vote.

— Oversight Project (@ItsYourGov) July 31, 2024

When they tried to look for these people in the voter rolls they couldn't find that they were actually registered. Seems more likely they were just confused by the questions. Or maybe the local/state officials couldn't verify citizenship and didn't register them. So yeah, I continue to maintain that actual voter fraud is a vanishingly small issue.

movielover said:

---

CNBC: Jill Biden's ex-husband arrested and charged with killing his current wife

---

The Biden crime family.

No one is above the law.

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

movielover said:

---

CNBC: Jill Biden's ex-husband arrested and charged with killing his current wife

---

The Biden crime family.

No one is above the law.

---

Jill's ex-husband wouldn't be a Biden, would he?

I timestamped this to start when this election video starts..our elections are so unsecure I can't believe this isn't a bipartisan agreement that things need to change.

Aunburdened said:

---

sycasey said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

What sensible forward thinking cutting edge leading nation is having a DEBATE on whether or not there should be VOTER ID?!?!!!! Like?!?!? They’re actually fighting NOT to have ppl present ID while voting for your leaders!!!!! Do you get it?!?!!!! Do you get it now?!?!!!

— Nicki Minaj (@NICKIMINAJ) February 2, 2026

I didn't have Nicki being the voice of reason on my 2026 bingo card

---

Okay, if anyone actually wants the legitimate argument against this, here it is

---

There is no legitimate argument against it and the fact that Democratic politicians fight so hard in the name of "It's just too much of a burden for these folks to get something that they're already getting so they can drive a car legally" tells you that they want to protect it for nefarious reasons.

Do I think the Democrats won the 2020 Presidential election based on fraud? No. Do I believe these stories about how voter fraud is astonishingly rare? About as much I believe all those stories by liberal corporate journalists that asserted confidently that COVID came from a bat in a wet market.

---

I can't see any valid reason NOT to require ID when voting. I remember the first time I voted, I had my ID out and was surprised I didn't need it.

Don't want to go to the trouble to create "National Identification Cards"? Just accept state DLs or IDs... any valid picture ID.

Is the Dems' fighting this "nefarious"? Or just another woke stupid thing they do? As a stupid Dem myself, I figure the latter.

When I was growing up, mandatory voter ID had been used for decades, especially in the South, to keep the wrong kind of people from voting. Fortunately, it was ending about then.

Are you arguing that it shouldn't be used nowadays? If so, why (specifically)?

sycasey said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

movielover said:

---

@ItsYourGov: There are an estimated 339,000 non-citizens living in Georgia.

If the 14% proportion holds true state wide, this would equate to over 47,000 registered non-citizens.

For context, Joe Biden "won" the state of Georgia by less than 12,000 votes in 2020.'

There are an estimated 339,000 non-citizens living in Georgia.

If the 14% proportion holds true state wide, this would equate to over 47,000 registered non-citizens.

For context, Joe Biden "won" the state of Georgia by less than 12,000 votes in 2020.'

— Oversight Project (@ItsYourGov) July 31, 2024

---

So it's not such a small amount that it doesn't matter. Sycasey what's your take?

---

I don't consider anecdotal evidence from Twitter randos.

---

Of course you don't. You still get your news from mainstream media

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

When I was growing up, mandatory voter ID had been used for decades, especially in the South, to keep the wrong kind of people from voting. Fortunately, it was ending about then.

---

https://www.history.com/articles/jim-crow-laws-black-vote

Quote:

---

Following the ratification in 1870 of the 15th Amendment, which barred states from depriving citizens the right to vote based on race, southern states began enacting measures such as poll taxes, literacy tests, all-white primaries, felony disenfranchisement laws, grandfather clauses, fraud and intimidation to keep African Americans from the polls.

---

Nowhere in there is voter ID listed because it was not used to suppress the vote. It obviously would have been a very ineffective way to prevent minorities from voting when they had far better methods to weed out who they didn't want voting.

Furthermore, the Supreme Court has already ruled on this in 2013, walking back some of the restrictions in the Voting Rights Act that prevented states from making changes to their own voting laws as the Democrats could not produce any evidence that there was any racially based voter suppression going on that the Act was designed to prevent. 35 of the 50 states have ID requirements already and there have been zero successful legal challenges to establish that any of those 36 states are engaged in voter suppression (though the Democratic Party's army of lawyers keeps trying).

https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/voter-id-laws-by-state

The problem with voting is not voter ID. The problem is access. Voting is made unnecessarily inconvenient by having limited days where you can vote, sometimes insufficient polling places, and unnecessary restrictions on what methods you can use to vote.

Big C said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

sycasey said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

What sensible forward thinking cutting edge leading nation is having a DEBATE on whether or not there should be VOTER ID?!?!!!! Like?!?!? They’re actually fighting NOT to have ppl present ID while voting for your leaders!!!!! Do you get it?!?!!!! Do you get it now?!?!!!

— Nicki Minaj (@NICKIMINAJ) February 2, 2026

I didn't have Nicki being the voice of reason on my 2026 bingo card

---

Okay, if anyone actually wants the legitimate argument against this, here it is

---

There is no legitimate argument against it and the fact that Democratic politicians fight so hard in the name of "It's just too much of a burden for these folks to get something that they're already getting so they can drive a car legally" tells you that they want to protect it for nefarious reasons.

Do I think the Democrats won the 2020 Presidential election based on fraud? No. Do I believe these stories about how voter fraud is astonishingly rare? About as much I believe all those stories by liberal corporate journalists that asserted confidently that COVID came from a bat in a wet market.

---

I can't see any valid reason NOT to require ID when voting. I remember the first time I voted, I had my ID out and was surprised I didn't need it.

Don't want to go to the trouble to create "National Identification Cards"? Just accept state DLs or IDs... any valid picture ID.

Is the Dems' fighting this "nefarious"? Or just another woke stupid thing they do? As a stupid Dem myself, I figure the latter.

---

No IDs enable individuals to vote multiple times, non citizens to vote, etc.

Only trumped by mail-in voting.

Americans agree with Nicki Minaj when it comes to voter id.

83% of favor photo voter id to vote per Pew. This includes 70%+ of Democrats and Republicans, as well as 75%+ of Americans across races.... White, Black, and Latino.

It's not controversial. pic.twitter.com/9Kocw85Uh8

— (((Harry Enten))) (@ForecasterEnten) February 3, 2026

Aunburdened said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

sycasey said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

What sensible forward thinking cutting edge leading nation is having a DEBATE on whether or not there should be VOTER ID?!?!!!! Like?!?!? They’re actually fighting NOT to have ppl present ID while voting for your leaders!!!!! Do you get it?!?!!!! Do you get it now?!?!!!

— Nicki Minaj (@NICKIMINAJ) February 2, 2026

I didn't have Nicki being the voice of reason on my 2026 bingo card

---

Okay, if anyone actually wants the legitimate argument against this, here it is

---

There is no legitimate argument against it and the fact that Democratic politicians fight so hard in the name of "It's just too much of a burden for these folks to get something that they're already getting so they can drive a car legally" tells you that they want to protect it for nefarious reasons.

---

Not everyone drives a car but they should still get to vote.

---

You need ID for about 10 other things other than just driving a car and you expose how intellectually dishonest you are when you pretend it's a burden for those folks to get ID.

---

This video has been posted here before, but it bears repeating just to point out how incredibly weak these Democrat arguments against voter ID are.

Is it racist to require an ID to vote?

White liberals vs black people:

pic.twitter.com/y5APErlaRE

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) February 3, 2026

Look who I ran into on the streets of San Francisco… Rich Freakin’ Gannon! pic.twitter.com/xIKYOo1CxP

— Jon Gruden (@BarstoolGruden) February 3, 2026

Just a trigger for another painful memory for a former lifetime Raiders fan. Gruden knew every play Raiders called:

"The Buccaneers defeated the Raiders by the score of 48-21, tied with Super Bowl XXXV for the seventh-largest Super Bowl margin of victory, winning their first-ever Super Bowl."
Wikipedia

movielover said:

---

Big C said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

sycasey said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

What sensible forward thinking cutting edge leading nation is having a DEBATE on whether or not there should be VOTER ID?!?!!!! Like?!?!? They’re actually fighting NOT to have ppl present ID while voting for your leaders!!!!! Do you get it?!?!!!! Do you get it now?!?!!!

— Nicki Minaj (@NICKIMINAJ) February 2, 2026

I didn't have Nicki being the voice of reason on my 2026 bingo card

---

Okay, if anyone actually wants the legitimate argument against this, here it is

---

There is no legitimate argument against it and the fact that Democratic politicians fight so hard in the name of "It's just too much of a burden for these folks to get something that they're already getting so they can drive a car legally" tells you that they want to protect it for nefarious reasons.

Do I think the Democrats won the 2020 Presidential election based on fraud? No. Do I believe these stories about how voter fraud is astonishingly rare? About as much I believe all those stories by liberal corporate journalists that asserted confidently that COVID came from a bat in a wet market.

---

I can't see any valid reason NOT to require ID when voting. I remember the first time I voted, I had my ID out and was surprised I didn't need it.

Don't want to go to the trouble to create "National Identification Cards"? Just accept state DLs or IDs... any valid picture ID.

Is the Dems' fighting this "nefarious"? Or just another woke stupid thing they do? As a stupid Dem myself, I figure the latter.

---

No IDs enable individuals to vote multiple times, non citizens to vote, etc.

Only trumped by mail-in voting.

---

movielover, we have agreed on a number of things over the past several years! Okay, not too big of a number, but still...

Mail-in voting is a vestige of the pandemic, which is gone. Everybody has a ****ing ID. If a few people don't what are the chances they want to vote? Stupid California keeps accepting votes until a week after the election because... what if someone dropped their ballot in the mailbox on election day and it got "lost in the mail" for awhile and didn't arrive for six days? Jesus...

If there is ever a big voter fraud problem, it might come in the window after the ballots are cast, but before they are officially counted as votes. Especially with the electronic machines. That's what I'd be worried about. All you would need is some expertise with electronic machines that can manipulate numbers to get any desired outcome. Why, I bet anybody who has ever owned a casino would know how to...

Oh, wait...

Aunburdened said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

sycasey said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

What sensible forward thinking cutting edge leading nation is having a DEBATE on whether or not there should be VOTER ID?!?!!!! Like?!?!? They’re actually fighting NOT to have ppl present ID while voting for your leaders!!!!! Do you get it?!?!!!! Do you get it now?!?!!!

— Nicki Minaj (@NICKIMINAJ) February 2, 2026

I didn't have Nicki being the voice of reason on my 2026 bingo card

---

Okay, if anyone actually wants the legitimate argument against this, here it is

---

There is no legitimate argument against it and the fact that Democratic politicians fight so hard in the name of "It's just too much of a burden for these folks to get something that they're already getting so they can drive a car legally" tells you that they want to protect it for nefarious reasons.

---

Not everyone drives a car but they should still get to vote.

---

You need ID for about 10 other things other than just driving a car and you expose how intellectually dishonest you are when you pretend it's a burden for those folks to get ID.

---

This video has been posted here before, but it bears repeating just to point out how incredibly weak these Democrat arguments against voter ID are.

Is it racist to require an ID to vote?

White liberals vs black people:

pic.twitter.com/y5APErlaRE

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) February 3, 2026

---

Liberal racism and or pandering.

for convenience here's DW's missing link (finger crossed)..
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-california-congressional-maps-8362a34b739ea91d37a190eee1b6a6d1

> WASHINGTON (AP) The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed California to use a new voter-approved congressional map that is favorable to Democrats in this year's elections, rejecting a last-ditch plea from state Republicans and the Trump administration.
No justices dissented from the brief order denying the appeal without explanation, as is common on the court's emergency docket.

SCOTUS has been pretty consistent about this: Gerrymandering is all fine. Or at least, it's not against the Constitution.

If we want to stop it then Congress has to pass a law.

smh said:

---

for convenience here's DW's missing link (finger crossed)..
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-california-congressional-maps-8362a34b739ea91d37a190eee1b6a6d1

> WASHINGTON (AP) The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed California to use a new voter-approved congressional map that is favorable to Democrats in this year's elections, rejecting a last-ditch plea from state Republicans and the Trump administration.
No justices dissented from the brief order denying the appeal without explanation, as is common on the court's emergency docket.

---

Quote:

---

Conservative Justice Samuel Alito wrote in December that it appeared both states had adopted new maps for political advantage, which the high court has previously ruled cannot be a basis for a federal lawsuit.

---

🚨DeSantis says NO DATA CENTERS!

They do NOT create jobs and suck up all the electricity!

“I don't think there's very many people that want to have higher energy bills just so some chatbot can corrupt some 13 year old kid online! That is not what anybody is signing up for!” pic.twitter.com/zQRQBqvx48

— Chris Nelson 🏝️🇺🇸 (@ReOpenChris) February 4, 2026

Interesting from Florida

BREAKING: Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass allegedly had officials alter an after-action report on the Palisades fire to downplay failures by the city and the Los Angeles Fire Department in combating the catastrophic blaze.

Sources close to Bass say she lied when she claimed she had… pic.twitter.com/an9cKJ225A

— Ryan Saavedra (@RyanSaavedra) February 4, 2026