How did Lautaro Martinez not even get a yellow card for this???? pic.twitter.com/PQmCv9ZfkN
— Raxfer Sinclair (@RaxferSinclair) June 22, 2026
Otra vez dos rojas perdonadas en una misma jugada.
— CD Ciudad De Zamora (@CdCiudadDZamora) June 22, 2026
Patada por detras abajo y agresión arriba con la mano.
Está claro que juegan con otras normas, lo saben y se aprovechan de ello. pic.twitter.com/h318SbhcdI
Big C said:
"Casuals" like me love the way the big scorers are delivering!
Cal88 said:
Norway-Senegal a very good game, two good teams going at it, Norway making Senegal pay for their mistakes.
Senegal on the brink, after facing the two heavyweights in the group of death, they need at the very least a narrow loss to hope getting through, assuming they beat Iraq.
Big C said:
"Casuals" like me love the way the big scorers are delivering!
concordtom said:Cal88 said:
Norway-Senegal a very good game, two good teams going at it, Norway making Senegal pay for their mistakes.
Senegal on the brink, after facing the two heavyweights in the group of death, they need at the very least a narrow loss to hope getting through, assuming they beat Iraq.
But, someone said Group D was the most difficult.
dajo9 said:
I do not consider myself a soccer fan but I do consider myself a fan of the World Cup. They should bring the number of teams back down to 32. Day after day I look at the lineup of games and I am just disinterested. There are way too many uncompetitive games. When does the USA play again?
ducktilldeath said:concordtom said:Cal88 said:
Norway-Senegal a very good game, two good teams going at it, Norway making Senegal pay for their mistakes.
Senegal on the brink, after facing the two heavyweights in the group of death, they need at the very least a narrow loss to hope getting through, assuming they beat Iraq.
But, someone said Group D was the most difficult.
Nobody said that.
Cal88 said:
On the plus side, you have nice side stories like Curacao, Bosnia and DR Congo who wouldn't have qualified otherwise. The other positive is that these tuneup games allow teams to gel and start the knockout rounds in a better shape, look at the USMNT. On the negative side, you have 20-30 games that are fillers.
So far deep into matchday 2 we have these breakdowns of the field:
The class of the tournament, at least 2 of these will be in the semis, depending on whether they meet earlier or not:
France, Argentina, Spain
Dangerous teams:
Morocco, England, Germany, Holland, Japan
Potential spoilers:
Norway, Belgium, Cote d'Ivoire; USA and Canada playing at home with big momentum, both top players Pulisic and Davies will be healthy in the bracket games.
Team Senegal is in disarray, problems with organisation and players not getting paid, otherwise would have been on top of the spoilers category.
smh said:ducktilldeath said:smh said:dajo9 said:
> Damn Canadians
me and my better half drove up to canada several times, twice to reconnect with our transplanted draft dodging UCSD college buddy, many weeks just driving around /day hikes, bucchardt (spelling sucks) gardens included, vast open space and mtns # ohh canada # trump free zone # good times / long gone
You drove to an island? Mad props!
edit: I'm aware that you can get to said island without leaving your car lol
some of this some of that, waayback in the rear view mirror
# ferries rock # life sentence stuck at home bear # bought several fetching sheep skins
ducktilldeath said:concordtom said:Cal88 said:
On the plus side, you have nice side stories like Curacao, Bosnia and DR Congo who wouldn't have qualified otherwise. The other positive is that these tuneup games allow teams to gel and start the knockout rounds in a better shape, look at the USMNT. On the negative side, you have 20-30 games that are fillers.
There's talk that the tournament will soon expand to 64 teams.
That would see 16 groups of 4 with the top 2 moving on the elimination stage of final 32 teams and 2 getting dropped after the first 3 group games.
I think it's great and I totally agree with your point about teams warning up and gelling.
64 is better than 48 for competitive reasons. The fact they created a system where 1/3 of the group winners have to face a runner up and the other 2/3 do not is asinine. The difference between a 2nd place group finisher and 3rd is frequently enormous. One could argue that the competition itself will be watered down at 64(it would be), but at least there isn't an inherent unfairness to the system. The randomness of the group selection process is one thing, but baking in a massive disadvantage for GROUP WINNERS is NCAA/FIA/IOC levels of stupidity.
dajo9 said:
There were complaints that the U.S. didn't have enough practice fields for 48 teams. When they go to 64 teams I guess the host will be Europe. Or Asia. It will become about what country hosts the final rounds.
BearlySane88 said:🚨🤯 CONFIRMED: MEMO OCHOA WILL START AGAINST CZECHIA AT THE ESTADIO AZTECA!
— All Fútbol MX 🇲🇽 (@AllFutbolMX) June 22, 2026
The 40-year-old legendary goalkeeper will get one last game for Mexico at a World Cup. 🧤🏆
Via @espnsutcliffe pic.twitter.com/Y0lCzJTxf9
Big C said:ducktilldeath said:concordtom said:Cal88 said:
On the plus side, you have nice side stories like Curacao, Bosnia and DR Congo who wouldn't have qualified otherwise. The other positive is that these tuneup games allow teams to gel and start the knockout rounds in a better shape, look at the USMNT. On the negative side, you have 20-30 games that are fillers.
There's talk that the tournament will soon expand to 64 teams.
That would see 16 groups of 4 with the top 2 moving on the elimination stage of final 32 teams and 2 getting dropped after the first 3 group games.
I think it's great and I totally agree with your point about teams warning up and gelling.
64 is better than 48 for competitive reasons. The fact they created a system where 1/3 of the group winners have to face a runner up and the other 2/3 do not is asinine. The difference between a 2nd place group finisher and 3rd is frequently enormous. One could argue that the competition itself will be watered down at 64(it would be), but at least there isn't an inherent unfairness to the system. The randomness of the group selection process is one thing, but baking in a massive disadvantage for GROUP WINNERS is NCAA/FIA/IOC levels of stupidity.
How about if they put every country in and establish the tradition of always having the opening game be between Italy and Vatican City, with an accompanying giant world-wide pool for the game's goal differential?
gotta think outside the box on this...
Alternatively, have the opener be between the US and Greenland, winner gets to annex the other country. Okay, some stick-in-the-mud will say that Greenland is not its own country. Whatever, Denmark needs to help make this work.
sycasey said:Big C said:
Okay, some stick-in-the-mud will say that Greenland is not its own country.
FIFA has plenty of member "nations" that are actually territories of another country! Scotland and Wales, for example. Curacao is in this tournament and is a Dutch territory.
We can make it happen for Greenland.

Among the most ignorant and brainwashed are some Pahlavi supporters living in the West.
— 𝐌𝐚𝐥𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐦 (@Malcolm_Pal9) June 23, 2026
A Pahlavi supporter approaches a woman carrying an Iranian🇮🇷 flag and violently throws her to the ground. pic.twitter.com/9WvhsdZv12
I had stopped posting videos of Iranian Monarchists celebrating the war or abusing their political opponents because they were simply bringing so much shame to the Iranian American community.
— Trita Parsi (@tparsi) June 16, 2026
But this one is so egregious, it has to be shown. Outside of the soccer game yesterday,… pic.twitter.com/v7FvZRLH3H
Shameful - Pahlavi supporters attacking Iranian fans outside the stadium at the FIFA world cup match pic.twitter.com/OAvOr1mlpM
— DANGERX_313 (@DANGERX_313) June 16, 2026
Pahlavi thugs assault Iran's soccer team supporters at the World Cup tournament in the United States. pic.twitter.com/Iert6POrDq
— Iran Screenshot (@iranscreenshot) June 21, 2026
the rapey monarchists are verbally abusing women for supporting Iran’s national team.
— Parisa (@loveparisa) June 16, 2026
These women don’t deserve vulgar insults and sexual harassment.
pic.twitter.com/ItyeYEztBG
Pahlavi supporters harass Iranian fans at the World Cup for displaying Iran's national flag pic.twitter.com/crbNNo9UmD
— MiddleEast Live (@MeLive007) June 22, 2026
For those asking, here’s a video of the moment pic.twitter.com/XEPm1SgnCC
— Holly Dagres (@hdagres) June 21, 2026
concordtom said:Big C said:ducktilldeath said:concordtom said:Cal88 said:
On the plus side, you have nice side stories like Curacao, Bosnia and DR Congo who wouldn't have qualified otherwise. The other positive is that these tuneup games allow teams to gel and start the knockout rounds in a better shape, look at the USMNT. On the negative side, you have 20-30 games that are fillers.
There's talk that the tournament will soon expand to 64 teams.
That would see 16 groups of 4 with the top 2 moving on the elimination stage of final 32 teams and 2 getting dropped after the first 3 group games.
I think it's great and I totally agree with your point about teams warning up and gelling.
64 is better than 48 for competitive reasons. The fact they created a system where 1/3 of the group winners have to face a runner up and the other 2/3 do not is asinine. The difference between a 2nd place group finisher and 3rd is frequently enormous. One could argue that the competition itself will be watered down at 64(it would be), but at least there isn't an inherent unfairness to the system. The randomness of the group selection process is one thing, but baking in a massive disadvantage for GROUP WINNERS is NCAA/FIA/IOC levels of stupidity.
How about if they put every country in and establish the tradition of always having the opening game be between Italy and Vatican City, with an accompanying giant world-wide pool for the game's goal differential?
gotta think outside the box on this...
Alternatively, have the opener be between the US and Greenland, winner gets to annex the other country. Okay, some stick-in-the-mud will say that Greenland is not its own country. Whatever, Denmark needs to help make this work.
Every team already IS in the tournament!
It's called qualifying, World Cup Qualifiers. Happens on every continent years and months before the World Cup Finals, which is this tournament.
It all ends with the Final of the Finals.
dajo9 said:concordtom said:Big C said:ducktilldeath said:concordtom said:Cal88 said:
On the plus side, you have nice side stories like Curacao, Bosnia and DR Congo who wouldn't have qualified otherwise. The other positive is that these tuneup games allow teams to gel and start the knockout rounds in a better shape, look at the USMNT. On the negative side, you have 20-30 games that are fillers.
There's talk that the tournament will soon expand to 64 teams.
That would see 16 groups of 4 with the top 2 moving on the elimination stage of final 32 teams and 2 getting dropped after the first 3 group games.
I think it's great and I totally agree with your point about teams warning up and gelling.
64 is better than 48 for competitive reasons. The fact they created a system where 1/3 of the group winners have to face a runner up and the other 2/3 do not is asinine. The difference between a 2nd place group finisher and 3rd is frequently enormous. One could argue that the competition itself will be watered down at 64(it would be), but at least there isn't an inherent unfairness to the system. The randomness of the group selection process is one thing, but baking in a massive disadvantage for GROUP WINNERS is NCAA/FIA/IOC levels of stupidity.
How about if they put every country in and establish the tradition of always having the opening game be between Italy and Vatican City, with an accompanying giant world-wide pool for the game's goal differential?
gotta think outside the box on this...
Alternatively, have the opener be between the US and Greenland, winner gets to annex the other country. Okay, some stick-in-the-mud will say that Greenland is not its own country. Whatever, Denmark needs to help make this work.
Every team already IS in the tournament!
It's called qualifying, World Cup Qualifiers. Happens on every continent years and months before the World Cup Finals, which is this tournament.
It all ends with the Final of the Finals.
With 64 teams the real qualifiers will be when FIFA decides how many teams each continent gets. More bribes, please.
dajo9 said:concordtom said:Big C said:ducktilldeath said:concordtom said:Cal88 said:
On the plus side, you have nice side stories like Curacao, Bosnia and DR Congo who wouldn't have qualified otherwise. The other positive is that these tuneup games allow teams to gel and start the knockout rounds in a better shape, look at the USMNT. On the negative side, you have 20-30 games that are fillers.
There's talk that the tournament will soon expand to 64 teams.
That would see 16 groups of 4 with the top 2 moving on the elimination stage of final 32 teams and 2 getting dropped after the first 3 group games.
I think it's great and I totally agree with your point about teams warning up and gelling.
64 is better than 48 for competitive reasons. The fact they created a system where 1/3 of the group winners have to face a runner up and the other 2/3 do not is asinine. The difference between a 2nd place group finisher and 3rd is frequently enormous. One could argue that the competition itself will be watered down at 64(it would be), but at least there isn't an inherent unfairness to the system. The randomness of the group selection process is one thing, but baking in a massive disadvantage for GROUP WINNERS is NCAA/FIA/IOC levels of stupidity.
How about if they put every country in and establish the tradition of always having the opening game be between Italy and Vatican City, with an accompanying giant world-wide pool for the game's goal differential?
gotta think outside the box on this...
Alternatively, have the opener be between the US and Greenland, winner gets to annex the other country. Okay, some stick-in-the-mud will say that Greenland is not its own country. Whatever, Denmark needs to help make this work.
Every team already IS in the tournament!
It's called qualifying, World Cup Qualifiers. Happens on every continent years and months before the World Cup Finals, which is this tournament.
It all ends with the Final of the Finals.
With 64 teams the real qualifiers will be when FIFA decides how many teams each continent gets. More bribes, please.
Cal88 said:
Pro-regime change Iranian expats harassing and attacking Iranian fans.Among the most ignorant and brainwashed are some Pahlavi supporters living in the West.
— 𝐌𝐚𝐥𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐦 (@Malcolm_Pal9) June 23, 2026
A Pahlavi supporter approaches a woman carrying an Iranian🇮🇷 flag and violently throws her to the ground. pic.twitter.com/9WvhsdZv12I had stopped posting videos of Iranian Monarchists celebrating the war or abusing their political opponents because they were simply bringing so much shame to the Iranian American community.
— Trita Parsi (@tparsi) June 16, 2026
But this one is so egregious, it has to be shown. Outside of the soccer game yesterday,… pic.twitter.com/v7FvZRLH3HShameful - Pahlavi supporters attacking Iranian fans outside the stadium at the FIFA world cup match pic.twitter.com/OAvOr1mlpM
— DANGERX_313 (@DANGERX_313) June 16, 2026Pahlavi thugs assault Iran's soccer team supporters at the World Cup tournament in the United States. pic.twitter.com/Iert6POrDq
— Iran Screenshot (@iranscreenshot) June 21, 2026the rapey monarchists are verbally abusing women for supporting Iran’s national team.
— Parisa (@loveparisa) June 16, 2026
These women don’t deserve vulgar insults and sexual harassment.
pic.twitter.com/ItyeYEztBGPahlavi supporters harass Iranian fans at the World Cup for displaying Iran's national flag pic.twitter.com/crbNNo9UmD
— MiddleEast Live (@MeLive007) June 22, 2026
Regime change supporters rooting against Iran:For those asking, here’s a video of the moment pic.twitter.com/XEPm1SgnCC
— Holly Dagres (@hdagres) June 21, 2026
sycasey said:
.. .. .. I don't think they should be harassing fans in the street but I've got no problem with cheering against the Iranian regime.
sycasey said:Cal88 said:
Pro-regime change Iranian expats harassing and attacking Iranian fans.Among the most ignorant and brainwashed are some Pahlavi supporters living in the West.
— 𝐌𝐚𝐥𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐦 (@Malcolm_Pal9) June 23, 2026
A Pahlavi supporter approaches a woman carrying an Iranian🇮🇷 flag and violently throws her to the ground. pic.twitter.com/9WvhsdZv12I had stopped posting videos of Iranian Monarchists celebrating the war or abusing their political opponents because they were simply bringing so much shame to the Iranian American community.
— Trita Parsi (@tparsi) June 16, 2026
But this one is so egregious, it has to be shown. Outside of the soccer game yesterday,… pic.twitter.com/v7FvZRLH3HShameful - Pahlavi supporters attacking Iranian fans outside the stadium at the FIFA world cup match pic.twitter.com/OAvOr1mlpM
— DANGERX_313 (@DANGERX_313) June 16, 2026Pahlavi thugs assault Iran's soccer team supporters at the World Cup tournament in the United States. pic.twitter.com/Iert6POrDq
— Iran Screenshot (@iranscreenshot) June 21, 2026the rapey monarchists are verbally abusing women for supporting Iran’s national team.
— Parisa (@loveparisa) June 16, 2026
These women don’t deserve vulgar insults and sexual harassment.
pic.twitter.com/ItyeYEztBGPahlavi supporters harass Iranian fans at the World Cup for displaying Iran's national flag pic.twitter.com/crbNNo9UmD
— MiddleEast Live (@MeLive007) June 22, 2026
Regime change supporters rooting against Iran:For those asking, here’s a video of the moment pic.twitter.com/XEPm1SgnCC
— Holly Dagres (@hdagres) June 21, 2026
I don't think they should be harassing fans in the street but I've got no problem with cheering against the Iranian regime.
Cal88 said:sycasey said:Cal88 said:
Pro-regime change Iranian expats harassing and attacking Iranian fans.Among the most ignorant and brainwashed are some Pahlavi supporters living in the West.
— 𝐌𝐚𝐥𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐦 (@Malcolm_Pal9) June 23, 2026
A Pahlavi supporter approaches a woman carrying an Iranian🇮🇷 flag and violently throws her to the ground. pic.twitter.com/9WvhsdZv12I had stopped posting videos of Iranian Monarchists celebrating the war or abusing their political opponents because they were simply bringing so much shame to the Iranian American community.
— Trita Parsi (@tparsi) June 16, 2026
But this one is so egregious, it has to be shown. Outside of the soccer game yesterday,… pic.twitter.com/v7FvZRLH3HShameful - Pahlavi supporters attacking Iranian fans outside the stadium at the FIFA world cup match pic.twitter.com/OAvOr1mlpM
— DANGERX_313 (@DANGERX_313) June 16, 2026Pahlavi thugs assault Iran's soccer team supporters at the World Cup tournament in the United States. pic.twitter.com/Iert6POrDq
— Iran Screenshot (@iranscreenshot) June 21, 2026the rapey monarchists are verbally abusing women for supporting Iran’s national team.
— Parisa (@loveparisa) June 16, 2026
These women don’t deserve vulgar insults and sexual harassment.
pic.twitter.com/ItyeYEztBGPahlavi supporters harass Iranian fans at the World Cup for displaying Iran's national flag pic.twitter.com/crbNNo9UmD
— MiddleEast Live (@MeLive007) June 22, 2026
Regime change supporters rooting against Iran:For those asking, here’s a video of the moment pic.twitter.com/XEPm1SgnCC
— Holly Dagres (@hdagres) June 21, 2026
I don't think they should be harassing fans in the street but I've got no problem with cheering against the Iranian regime.
These pro-Pahlavi fans in the bottom link were actually cheering against the Iran team...