chazzed said:

---

Republicans profess their support for the right to peacefully assemble...until the masses do so against a historically unpopular GOP president. Then they push Antifa and paid protestor nonsense.

---

Aunburdened said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

Stop spamming the board with Gandhi ****

---

Just stop spamming the board with any of his crap

---

Justice for the Gays of Hormuz pic.twitter.com/73SFJr5dBD

— Geiger Capital (@Geiger_Capital) March 30, 2026

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

Justice for the Gays of Hormuz pic.twitter.com/73SFJr5dBD

— Geiger Capital (@Geiger_Capital) March 30, 2026

NO KINGS

---

Aunburdened said:

---

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

concordtom said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

Stop spamming the board with Gandhi ****

---

Just stop spamming the board with any of his crap

---

You guys are funny.
I submit a few high minded thoughts about a famous leader and you guys throw a fit.

Don't bother being inspired by anyone, or try to improve what you put out into the world, or for yourself.

My posts about Gandhi were as much as for myself as for anyone. In fact, most of what I type is for my own mental processing.

I suppose anyone on an anonymous forum is doing the same, self processing what's in their own head.

---

High minded thoughts about Gandhi along with the usual Trump murder porn. Thought the Gandhi was a joke, the murder porn being your signature

---

concordtom said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

---

Murder Porn Alert
at 3:38 to 4:14.

---

concordtom said:

---

---

sycasey said:

---

Except it's pretty obvious that people at these protests have talked about those things.

---

Aunburdened said:

---

sycasey said:

---

So I haven't participated in any of this No Kings stuff, but early in the first Trump term I was involved with creating a local group for Indivisible, and I know that the Indivisible people do a lot of the national coordination for No Kings too. I haven't been involved in that group for many years, so maybe it's changed but I'll speak to my experience with them:

The national messaging for Indivisible/No Kings is intentionally very broad and vague, because they want the local groups to tailor the message to whatever they think works for their local communities. If you're in San Francisco you can probably be as safely lefty as you want and go full pro-Palestine, pro-trans, etc. But a No Kings organizer in Boise, Idaho might want to have a more moderate message that pulls in more participants in a more conservative area. They want to leave that up to them, so the national guidance will not name a lot of specific policies to trumpet. Some people want to point this out as a fault of the movement, but it is very much a feature and not a bug.

---

That's because it's a recruitment tool for the Democratic Party and not a protest.

---

sycasey said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

sycasey said:

---

So I haven't participated in any of this No Kings stuff, but early in the first Trump term I was involved with creating a local group for Indivisible, and I know that the Indivisible people do a lot of the national coordination for No Kings too. I haven't been involved in that group for many years, so maybe it's changed but I'll speak to my experience with them:

The national messaging for Indivisible/No Kings is intentionally very broad and vague, because they want the local groups to tailor the message to whatever they think works for their local communities. If you're in San Francisco you can probably be as safely lefty as you want and go full pro-Palestine, pro-trans, etc. But a No Kings organizer in Boise, Idaho might want to have a more moderate message that pulls in more participants in a more conservative area. They want to leave that up to them, so the national guidance will not name a lot of specific policies to trumpet. Some people want to point this out as a fault of the movement, but it is very much a feature and not a bug.

---

That's because it's a recruitment tool for the Democratic Party and not a protest.

---

Indivisible makes no real secret of that: they want to elect more Democrats.

---

Aunburdened said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

sycasey said:

---

So I haven't participated in any of this No Kings stuff, but early in the first Trump term I was involved with creating a local group for Indivisible, and I know that the Indivisible people do a lot of the national coordination for No Kings too. I haven't been involved in that group for many years, so maybe it's changed but I'll speak to my experience with them:

The national messaging for Indivisible/No Kings is intentionally very broad and vague, because they want the local groups to tailor the message to whatever they think works for their local communities. If you're in San Francisco you can probably be as safely lefty as you want and go full pro-Palestine, pro-trans, etc. But a No Kings organizer in Boise, Idaho might want to have a more moderate message that pulls in more participants in a more conservative area. They want to leave that up to them, so the national guidance will not name a lot of specific policies to trumpet. Some people want to point this out as a fault of the movement, but it is very much a feature and not a bug.

---

That's because it's a recruitment tool for the Democratic Party and not a protest.

---

Indivisible makes no real secret of that: they want to elect more Democrats.

---

Now all you have to do is just take that final step and admit what everyone else knows, but you are too proud to admit

---

Everywhere.

But the big organized liberal groups that people might expect to organize big rallies, are controlled by the Democratic Party, aka Zionists. They support the war. So the mass SMS calls to protest do not go out. The right-War Party then pretends no one really minds. https://t.co/cp7pDwQKNF

— Scott Horton (@scotthortonshow) April 2, 2026

sycasey said:

---

I really don't think the No Kings/Indivisible people are pro-war.

---

if the Democratic party wants to "reinvent" its approach to US foreign policy — but their leaders keep refusing to acknowledge their role in building & maintaining America's murderous war machine — then that project should be understood as fundamentally unserious & doomed to fail https://t.co/jqfISuXdMw

— Alex JER-dun (@alexjordanATL) April 2, 2026

Aunburdened said:

---

sycasey said:

---

I really don't think the No Kings/Indivisible people are pro-war.

---

if the Democratic party wants to "reinvent" its approach to US foreign policy — but their leaders keep refusing to acknowledge their role in building & maintaining America's murderous war machine — then that project should be understood as fundamentally unserious & doomed to fail https://t.co/jqfISuXdMw

— Alex JER-dun (@alexjordanATL) April 2, 2026

---

tequila4kapp said:

---

Thank you for providing a list.

I am SO not interested in defending that list or getting into an argument. I am asking honest questions to understand how this isn't just TDS/anti-Republicanism, etc.

Here is my question: How do you level this list with the instances where the Biden Admin ignored/circumvented court orders (Title 9, student loans, CDC eviction moratorium, etc.)? The Democratic party rigging primaries to benefit one candidate (HRC) over another (Bernie)? The Democratic party booting a duly nominated candidate - who was also the sitting President - because they believed he could not win? (if they really thought he was incapable of doing the job they would have 25th Amendment-ed him). The Democratic party hand selecting a replacement candidate without any electoral process?

How are those actions any better or different? Were they not "King-like" in that centralized authority circumvented inconveniences to their ruling objective where those inconveniences were clearly rooted in democratic and rule of law principles?

---