BearlySane88 said:
Will nothing ever be enough for you and others like you? You're so sure that Trump is guilty that I believe you won't ever come to terms with the fact that there is no factual evidence showing Trump is guilty of anything related to this situation
Evidence? The people in charge of the evidence have been caught playing games with it. Not a good look for an innocent man.
Since you posed a personal question about me and people like me, I will return the favor by posing a personal question to "you and people like you:"
With the extremes that you have to go to in your defense of Trump's actions, do you have to look in the mirror in the morning and recite a daily affirmation before you put your pants on?
*I have at least some respect for the few Trump supporters that say they believe his policies are good for America and therefore they are willing to overlook his failings and misconduct (Trump, himself, acknowledged this when he said he could "shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose a supporter).
The supporters that need a leader with solid character feel they have to take issue with every instance of his bad conduct (conflicts of interest, self dealing, felony convictions, judgments in civil suits against him for defamation and sexual assault, emotional outbursts, his statements related to the Nobel Peace Prize and Medal of Honor, early morning bizarre rants on Truth Social, etc.,etc.,etc.,etc.)
*The way the DOJ has handled the release of the Epstein files is doing the exact opposite of making connected people in Epstein's orbit look innocent:
Withholding Evidence Related to Donald Trump:
An investigation revealed that the DOJ withheld dozens of pages of FBI interview notes from 2019 involving a survivor who alleged sexual abuse by Donald Trump when she was a minor. Representative Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) stated that after reviewing unredacted logs, he could confirm the DOJ "illegally withheld" these interviews.
"Spying" on Congressional Reviewers:
Lawmakers, including Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) and Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.), accused the DOJ of tracking their search history and monitoring which documents they opened in secure "reading rooms". This was described as an "inappropriate" and "problematic" breach of oversight.
Inconsistent Redactions:
The DOJ has been criticized for "malicious compliance," releasing millions of pages with heavy redactions on critical documents while failing to protect victims. In one instance, it was reported that high-profile names were shielded while the full names and nude photos of nearly 100 survivors were inadvertently exposed, an act victims' attorneys called "the single most egregious violation of victim privacy in one day in United States history".
Missing and Disappearing Files:
Investigators noted that certain documents, such as a 69-page DEA memo and spreadsheets summarizing complaints, were temporarily removed or became unavailable online shortly after being noticed by the public. Lawmakers claim the DOJ has released only a fraction of the documents mandated by law.
Misleading Statements on Completion:
Despite Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy AG Todd Blanche insisting in a Feb. 14 letter that no records were withheld for political sensitivity, subsequent reviews by Congress found significant omissions, prompting new investigations into whether the DOJ provided false information to the public and Congress.
The New York Times
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
