Jeffrey Epstein

233,408 Views | 2549 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by movielover
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haloski said:


Same here, man. There's no proof out there that Trump is a pedo. If anything, he's a statutory rapist. Then again, there are 3 million docs that weren't released despite absolute clarity that they should have been.

My thing has always been that there is absolute certainty that Trump was very buddy-buddy with Epstein and knew EXACTLY who he was while letting him operate and recruit on his property for years until it became inconvenient for him to do so. At that point, he turned on him and spoke with authorities. There was nothing about any of his actions that was less than transactional and self-interest related.

The fact that you guys go to bat for this guy is unbelievable. What void does it fill? Surely it could be filled more effectively and honorably.


The people that go to "bat" for him have an 0 - 2 count against them and they keep fouling the ball off.

I wonder if Pam Bondi is still talking about Dow 50,000.
She literally yapped that at the TOP.
Talk about a contrary indicator.

lol




BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let me know when there is proof of statutory rape or him being a pedo. His civil case involving E Jean Carroll wouldn't have even met the standard for guilt in a criminal trial if the statute of limitations hadn't expired.
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haloski said:

BearlySane88 said:

Where's the proof he's a pedo? Still waiting for that


Same here, man. There's no proof out there that Trump is a pedo. If anything, he's a statutory rapist. Then again, there are 3 million docs that weren't released despite absolute clarity that they should have been.

My thing has always been that there is absolute certainty that Trump was very buddy-buddy with Epstein and knew EXACTLY who he was while letting him operate and recruit on his property for years until it became inconvenient for him to do so. At that point, he turned on him and spoke with authorities. There was nothing about any of his actions that was less than transactional and self-interest related.

The fact that you guys go to bat for this guy is unbelievable. What void does it fill? Surely it could be filled more effectively and honorably.

You are right--we should refer to him as a statutory rapist.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Got any evidence or can we just start calling you that too? If we don't need evidence to call people things, it's just a free for all right?
Haloski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Let me know when there is proof of statutory rape or him being a pedo. His civil case involving E Jean Carroll wouldn't have even met the standard for guilt in a criminal trial if the statute of limitations hadn't expired.


If focus on the stuff that the other person said there isnt proof of if I were you, too.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let me know when you have proof. You claim it as fact but I'm still waiting for you to provide any evidence to back it up
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haloski said:

BearlySane88 said:

Where's the proof he's a pedo? Still waiting for that

Same here, man. There's no proof out there that Trump is a pedo.

Maybe you'll find proof during the next Democratic administration!
Haloski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Haloski said:

BearlySane88 said:

Where's the proof he's a pedo? Still waiting for that

Same here, man. There's no proof out there that Trump is a pedo.

Maybe you'll find proof during the next Democratic administration!


Good to hear from you!

It's Tuesday, so I'm not sure what your stance on punishing and not covering for the actual pedophiles in the Epstein files is. I can't quite keep track of your schedule. I think you were most recently in favor of protecting pedophiles and suppressing/redacting the files, a stark contrast from the person you were in the early binder days.

Yuck. From Binder Boy to Captain Pedo Protector.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Any proof yet?
Haloski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Any proof yet?


Do I have proof of what I never said?

I have no proof that he was a pedophile or a statutory rapist, but then again I never said that he was either. I did say "IF anything" about the statutory rapist part. It's all there for you to read again, if you'd like.

Keep carrying water for the billionaire in a baseball hat, if that's your jam, though.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haloski said:

BearlySane88 said:

Any proof yet?


Do I have proof of what I never said?

I have no proof that he was a pedophile or a statutory rapist, but then again I never said that he was either. I did say "IF anything" about the statutory rapist part. It's all there for you to read again, if you'd like.

Keep carrying water for the billionaire in a baseball hat, if that's your jam, though.


Oh I read it but maybe you forgot what you wrote. You called Pac10 a pedo protector. What pedo is he protecting exactly?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haloski said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Haloski said:

BearlySane88 said:

Where's the proof he's a pedo? Still waiting for that

Same here, man. There's no proof out there that Trump is a pedo.

Maybe you'll find proof during the next Democratic administration!


Good to hear from you!

It's Tuesday, so I'm not sure what your stance on punishing and not covering for the actual pedophiles in the Epstein files is. I can't quite keep track of your schedule. I think you were most recently in favor of protecting pedophiles and suppressing/redacting the files, a stark contrast from the person you were in the early binder days.

Yuck. From Binder Boy to Captain Pedo Protector.

Most of your recent posting history in BI is in this thread, which is why you have been given the unfortunate name, EpsteinOski, by yours truly.

For a person with a singular interest and focus, I would expect something more insightful coming from you.

Drop some names from the Podesta emails and entertain us.

dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

Haloski said:

BearlySane88 said:

Where's the proof he's a pedo? Still waiting for that


Same here, man. There's no proof out there that Trump is a pedo. If anything, he's a statutory rapist. Then again, there are 3 million docs that weren't released despite absolute clarity that they should have been.

My thing has always been that there is absolute certainty that Trump was very buddy-buddy with Epstein and knew EXACTLY who he was while letting him operate and recruit on his property for years until it became inconvenient for him to do so. At that point, he turned on him and spoke with authorities. There was nothing about any of his actions that was less than transactional and self-interest related.

The fact that you guys go to bat for this guy is unbelievable. What void does it fill? Surely it could be filled more effectively and honorably.

You are right--we should refer to him as a statutory rapist.

This is why democrats lose
Censorship has always been a tool of the fascist
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Any proof yet?
Booth.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

BearlySane88 said:

Any proof yet?
Booth.


Have you found any proof or just being a troll?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Haloski said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Haloski said:

BearlySane88 said:

Where's the proof he's a pedo? Still waiting for that

Same here, man. There's no proof out there that Trump is a pedo.

Maybe you'll find proof during the next Democratic administration!


Good to hear from you!

It's Tuesday, so I'm not sure what your stance on punishing and not covering for the actual pedophiles in the Epstein files is. I can't quite keep track of your schedule. I think you were most recently in favor of protecting pedophiles and suppressing/redacting the files, a stark contrast from the person you were in the early binder days.

Yuck. From Binder Boy to Captain Pedo Protector.

Most of your recent posting history in BI is in this thread, which is why you have been given the unfortunate name, EpsteinOski, by yours truly.

For a person with a singular interest and focus, I would expect something more insightful coming from you.

Drop some names from the Podesta emails and entertain us.


Here's a name for you.

This is Leon Black, a billionaire and close friend of Trump.

He raped a 7 year old girl.

His son is a high official in the Trump administration.




BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah f that guy. Is his son guilty because his dad did something wrong?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Yeah f that guy. Is his son guilty because his dad did something wrong?


He appointed the son of his friend.

It's a terrible look and you know it.

And why isn't Kash Patel going after that pedo rapist? Here's what MTG had to say about that:





BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You'd have to ask Kash but again a son isn't guilty of his father's crimes
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Binder Bondi!


BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm confused by your stance on posting limits.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

I'm confused by your stance on posting limits.

Why would you care?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Because you don't practice what you preach so I'm curious if your stance is just for people who post things you don't agree with or if you actually want post limits.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Because you don't practice what you preach so I'm curious if your stance is just for people who post things you don't agree with or if you actually want post limits.


I repeat: No one was even remotely interested in my suggestion for a daily post limit.

Since there is no interest, then there is no motivation to practice what I was preaching.

In other words, "Why should I care if no one else does?"

The logic is pretty simple.
Hope that answers your QUESTION.

That having been said, I don't see myself posting 280x over a three day period.
That will never happen.

Never.


BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:


I repeat: No one was even remotely interested in my suggestion for a daily post limit.




Agreed
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Let's keep our own dirty laundry in the hamper
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So much for transparency of elected officials being paid with our tax dollars.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:



Let's keep our own dirty laundry in the hamper


Such a joke.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

You'd have to ask Kash but again a son isn't guilty of his father's crimes


Trump appointed his son because he is close friend with his pedo predator father, just like he appointed his SOL Kushner's slimebag father as ambassador.

98.5% bad faith
1.5% ignorance
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

You'd have to ask Kash but again a son isn't guilty of his father's crimes


Trump appointed his son because he is close friend with his pedo predator father, just like he appointed his SOL Kushner's slimebag father as ambassador.

98.5% bad faith
1.5% ignorance


Again, a son is not guilty of his father's crimes.

100% regime protector
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

You'd have to ask Kash but again a son isn't guilty of his father's crimes


Trump appointed his son because he is close friend with his pedo predator father, just like he appointed his SOL Kushner's slimebag father as ambassador.

98.5% bad faith
1.5% ignorance


Again, a son is not guilty of his father's crimes.

100% regime protector


100% bad faith
0% ignorance
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So we should lock up all murder's kids? What about tax fraud's children? What level of crime trickles down to the child?

100% stupid post
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

So we should lock up all murder's kids? What about tax fraud's children? What level of crime trickles down to the child?

100% stupid post


Nepotism is one of the main currencies of the Epstein Administration.

Get it now?

I think you got it before though, that was a rhetorical question.

99.9% bad faith
0.1% ignorance
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.