Jeffrey Epstein

288,279 Views | 2699 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by BearlySane88
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 6:39a, 5/11/26
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
Cal88 said:
Boy oh boy.

Trump vetoed a bill to bring water to Colorado because Rep. Boebert signed to petition to expose the Epstein ring.



Look for Adelson and Singer to throw more millions trying to oust Massie now, can't have that kind of straight talk in their Congress.

Thomas Massie, financed by pro-Islamists outside the state of Kentucky, goes on Tucker's show, who previously denied calling Trump the Antichrist to talk about Epstein water....Maybe it will catch on?



That is a bald-faced lie and a typical example of zionists projecting. Absolutely disgraceful.

The main reason Singer, Adelson and Paulson are throwing millions into a small rural Kentucky district is because a principled local Congressman dared go against AIPAC and criticize Israel, and you know it.


Principled "local" congressman with 95% of his donations from outside Kentucky.


Mostly from first time small donors, average donation around $100. The astroturfed empty suit who they run against Massie got most of his donations from three oligarchs working for a foreign lobby.

This is a prime example of how twisted and disgustingly fake your argumentation is.
Reply Quote
2
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 6:46a, 5/11/26
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
Thomas Massie, financed by pro-Islamists outside the state of Kentucky, goes on Tucker's show, who previously denied calling Trump the Antichrist to talk about Epstein water....Maybe it will catch on?



That is a bald-faced lie and a typical example of zionists projecting. Absolutely disgraceful.

The main reason Singer, Adelson and Paulson are throwing millions into a small rural Kentucky district is because a principled local Congressman dared go against AIPAC and criticize Israel, and you know it.


Principled "local" congressman with 95% of his donations from outside Kentucky.


Paul Singer is from NY, John Paulson from Florida, and Miriam Adelson from Nevada.



Super PAC Targeting Massie Funded By Three Israel-Backing Billionaires | The Liberty Beacon
Reply Quote
2
2 edits
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 7:00a
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
Cal88 said:
Boy oh boy.

Trump vetoed a bill to bring water to Colorado because Rep. Boebert signed to petition to expose the Epstein ring.



Look for Adelson and Singer to throw more millions trying to oust Massie now, can't have that kind of straight talk in their Congress.

Thomas Massie, financed by pro-Islamists outside the state of Kentucky, goes on Tucker's show, who previously denied calling Trump the Antichrist to talk about Epstein water....Maybe it will catch on?



That is a bald-faced lie and a typical example of zionists projecting. Absolutely disgraceful.

The main reason Singer, Adelson and Paulson are throwing millions into a small rural Kentucky district is because a principled local Congressman dared go against AIPAC and criticize Israel, and you know it.


Principled "local" congressman with 95% of his donations from outside Kentucky.


Mostly from first time small donors, average donation around $100. The astroturfed empty suit who they run against Massie got most of his donations from three oligarchs working for a foreign lobby.

This is a prime example of how twisted and disgustingly fake your argumentation is.


You can spin it however you want but my argumentation isn't fake, if it was then you would have refuted it with facts stating otherwise. My post remains true, 95% of his funding is from outside of Kentucky. I said nothing about his opponent, just that it's interesting such a local boy isn't getting much local funding
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 7:09a
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
Cal88 said:
Boy oh boy.

Trump vetoed a bill to bring water to Colorado because Rep. Boebert signed to petition to expose the Epstein ring.



Look for Adelson and Singer to throw more millions trying to oust Massie now, can't have that kind of straight talk in their Congress.

Thomas Massie, financed by pro-Islamists outside the state of Kentucky, goes on Tucker's show, who previously denied calling Trump the Antichrist to talk about Epstein water....Maybe it will catch on?



That is a bald-faced lie and a typical example of zionists projecting. Absolutely disgraceful.

The main reason Singer, Adelson and Paulson are throwing millions into a small rural Kentucky district is because a principled local Congressman dared go against AIPAC and criticize Israel, and you know it.


Principled "local" congressman with 95% of his donations from outside Kentucky.


Mostly from first time small donors, average donation around $100. The astroturfed empty suit who they run against Massie got most of his donations from three oligarchs working for a foreign lobby.

This is a prime example of how twisted and disgustingly fake your argumentation is.


You can spin it however you want but my argumentation isn't fake, if it was then you would have refuted it with facts stating otherwise. My post remains true, 95% of his funding is from outside of Kentucky. I said nothing about his opponent, just that it's interesting such a local boy isn't getting much local funding


Keep obfuscating the fact that Massie's astroturfed opponent is funded by three Israel first oligarchs.

Your point above about Massie not getting local funding is also false propaganda, Massie has far broader support within Kentucky than his oligarch funded stand-in:



Thanks, and have a good day.
Reply Quote
2
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 7:23a
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
Cal88 said:
Boy oh boy.

Trump vetoed a bill to bring water to Colorado because Rep. Boebert signed to petition to expose the Epstein ring.



Look for Adelson and Singer to throw more millions trying to oust Massie now, can't have that kind of straight talk in their Congress.

Thomas Massie, financed by pro-Islamists outside the state of Kentucky, goes on Tucker's show, who previously denied calling Trump the Antichrist to talk about Epstein water....Maybe it will catch on?



That is a bald-faced lie and a typical example of zionists projecting. Absolutely disgraceful.

The main reason Singer, Adelson and Paulson are throwing millions into a small rural Kentucky district is because a principled local Congressman dared go against AIPAC and criticize Israel, and you know it.


Principled "local" congressman with 95% of his donations from outside Kentucky.


Mostly from first time small donors, average donation around $100. The astroturfed empty suit who they run against Massie got most of his donations from three oligarchs working for a foreign lobby.

This is a prime example of how twisted and disgustingly fake your argumentation is.


You can spin it however you want but my argumentation isn't fake, if it was then you would have refuted it with facts stating otherwise. My post remains true, 95% of his funding is from outside of Kentucky. I said nothing about his opponent, just that it's interesting such a local boy isn't getting much local funding


Keep obfuscating the fact that Massie's astroturfed opponent is funded by three Israel first oligarchs.

Your point above about Massie not getting local funding is also false propaganda, Massie has far broader support within Kentucky than his oligarch funded stand-in:



Thanks, and have a good day.


You seem to be taking this personally, are you from Kentucky or related to Massie?

You're conflating my statement. There was no comparison made or avoided, my point was simple and factual. Massie is largely funded by donations outside of Kentucky. Yes 5% of his donations are local, 95% aren't. My original post still holds true.
Reply Quote
2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.