Jeffrey Epstein

230,429 Views | 2545 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by Cal88
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 7:05p, 2/12/26
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Massie is on his way out. Getting creamed in the polls. Call this his last hurrah I guess

Yeah no.



Guess what, people in rural Kentucky aren't as dumb as the average MAGA ******.





That's not a poll it's a predictive market. Also, nobody here is protecting pedos or pushing to protect pedos. I have yet to see one poster say they don't want all the files released. Ridiculous claim you're making there





Your source is literally that meme







Quote:
Please show me where I attacked Massie in my above post? I said two facts and an opinion. None were attacking Massie.

Are you still pretending you weren't disparaging Massie with that post calling his supporters "Masswipes"?



Not pretending anything. I wasn't disparaging Massie. I posted the tweet for the chart provided which you've ignored entirely. And the post you quoted me in isn't even the post Wags was referring to lol

Are you suggesting the FEC filings are inaccurate?


You were clearly being hypocritical when claiming you weren't disparaging Massie.



Nope I wasn't because I added no personal opinion about Massie at all

You quoted that tweet in defense of your argument. The logical assumption is that you agreed with it. You post someone else's name calling, you own it too.


Where did I name call? As stated, I posted the tweet for the chart.

Dance, dance, dance.
Spin, spin, spin.
Weasel, weasel, weasel.

You chose to post a tweet calling other people Masswipes, you own it.


He's clearly not arguing in good faith.


lol you're all just missing the reason I posted that tweet even though I've explained myself multiple times. He's more popular in terms of political donations in California than he is in his own state.


Go ahead and post the percentage of total donations from Kentucky that the astroturfed Trump Pedo Swamp tool running against Massie got, for ****s and giggles.

Your sources are crap, if you rely on them and don't bother to do a minimum of due diligence, you're going to look even worse than you usually do.
Reply Quote
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aunburdened • 7:24p, 2/12/26
Aunburdened said:
BearlySane88 said:
Aunburdened said:
BearlySane88 said:
Aunburdened said:
BearlySane88 said:
Massie is on his way out. Getting creamed in the polls. Call this his last hurrah I guess

Doubtful.
https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/07/politics/massie-trump-paul-kentucky-primary

It only matters how the people in the 4th Congressional District feel about Massie. How he polls with the rest of the country is irrelevant.


It's just very interesting that 25% of his funding comes from California. Only 4% from Kentucky

Not when you consider where his opponent's funding comes from.

My point is, the claim is he's very popular in Kentucky but his funding doesn't match that

Your point is weak. You need to look at voter support, not monetary support.


That's exactly what I'm saying lol. Why doesn't voter support match monetary support? If he's so loved in Kentucky, why isn't he getting the donor support from Kentucky?
Reply Quote
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 7:26p, 2/12/26
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Massie is on his way out. Getting creamed in the polls. Call this his last hurrah I guess

Yeah no.



Guess what, people in rural Kentucky aren't as dumb as the average MAGA ******.





That's not a poll it's a predictive market. Also, nobody here is protecting pedos or pushing to protect pedos. I have yet to see one poster say they don't want all the files released. Ridiculous claim you're making there





Your source is literally that meme







Quote:
Please show me where I attacked Massie in my above post? I said two facts and an opinion. None were attacking Massie.

Are you still pretending you weren't disparaging Massie with that post calling his supporters "Masswipes"?



Not pretending anything. I wasn't disparaging Massie. I posted the tweet for the chart provided which you've ignored entirely. And the post you quoted me in isn't even the post Wags was referring to lol

Are you suggesting the FEC filings are inaccurate?


You were clearly being hypocritical when claiming you weren't disparaging Massie.



Nope I wasn't because I added no personal opinion about Massie at all

You quoted that tweet in defense of your argument. The logical assumption is that you agreed with it. You post someone else's name calling, you own it too.


Where did I name call? As stated, I posted the tweet for the chart.

Dance, dance, dance.
Spin, spin, spin.
Weasel, weasel, weasel.

You chose to post a tweet calling other people Masswipes, you own it.


He's clearly not arguing in good faith.


lol you're all just missing the reason I posted that tweet even though I've explained myself multiple times. He's more popular in terms of political donations in California than he is in his own state.


Go ahead and post the percentage of total donations from Kentucky that the astroturfed Trump Pedo Swamp tool running against Massie got, for ****s and giggles.

Your sources are crap, if you rely on them and don't bother to do a minimum of due diligence, you're going to look even worse than you usually do.



Your view of me means absolutely nothing to my life lol. It's not my fault you're entirely missing the point because you have some hard on for Massie. I know his opponent is heavily funded from out of state. You all keep saying Massie is so loved in Kentucky but he isn't getting monetary support from Kentucky. Why?
Reply Quote
2 edits
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 7:27p, 2/12/26
DiabloWags said:
bearister said:
Trump is a Zionist.


Bingo.


Random point that has nothing to do with the conversation
Reply Quote
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 7:29p, 2/12/26
BearlySane88 said:
Aunburdened said:
BearlySane88 said:
Aunburdened said:
BearlySane88 said:
Aunburdened said:
BearlySane88 said:
Massie is on his way out. Getting creamed in the polls. Call this his last hurrah I guess

Doubtful.
https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/07/politics/massie-trump-paul-kentucky-primary

It only matters how the people in the 4th Congressional District feel about Massie. How he polls with the rest of the country is irrelevant.


It's just very interesting that 25% of his funding comes from California. Only 4% from Kentucky

Not when you consider where his opponent's funding comes from.

My point is, the claim is he's very popular in Kentucky but his funding doesn't match that

Your point is weak. You need to look at voter support, not monetary support.


That's exactly what I'm saying lol. Why doesn't voter support match monetary support? If he's so loved in Kentucky, why isn't he getting the donor support from Kentucky?

Maybe people in Kentucky have better things to do with their money than spend it on politicians.

Stop making BS arguments.
Reply Quote
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 7:31p, 2/12/26
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Massie is on his way out. Getting creamed in the polls. Call this his last hurrah I guess

Yeah no.



Guess what, people in rural Kentucky aren't as dumb as the average MAGA ******.





That's not a poll it's a predictive market. Also, nobody here is protecting pedos or pushing to protect pedos. I have yet to see one poster say they don't want all the files released. Ridiculous claim you're making there





Your source is literally that meme







Quote:
Please show me where I attacked Massie in my above post? I said two facts and an opinion. None were attacking Massie.

Are you still pretending you weren't disparaging Massie with that post calling his supporters "Masswipes"?



Not pretending anything. I wasn't disparaging Massie. I posted the tweet for the chart provided which you've ignored entirely. And the post you quoted me in isn't even the post Wags was referring to lol

Are you suggesting the FEC filings are inaccurate?


You were clearly being hypocritical when claiming you weren't disparaging Massie.



Nope I wasn't because I added no personal opinion about Massie at all

You quoted that tweet in defense of your argument. The logical assumption is that you agreed with it. You post someone else's name calling, you own it too.


Where did I name call? As stated, I posted the tweet for the chart.

Dance, dance, dance.
Spin, spin, spin.
Weasel, weasel, weasel.

You chose to post a tweet calling other people Masswipes, you own it.


He's clearly not arguing in good faith.




Dumb attempt to swiftboat Massie.

The tweet that you've posted yourself shows that Jeff Yass is backing libertarians like Rand Paul, and that his motivation here is for free speech and against censorship of TikTok, which in fact is something hardcore zonists like the billionaires who back his opponent strongly oppose. See the archzionist Ellison who bought TikTok and CBS with the help of Trump and the zioswamp in order to shut down online criticism of the Gaza genocide.




The other grossly egregious aspect is that Yass' donation, $32K, is tiny next to that of archzionist megabillionaires Adelson, Singer and co, who have pumped millions into the astroturfed opponent of Massie.

That's why trying to paint Massie as a zionist is completely r3tarded.

I think in this case though your argumentation is more about deception than plain ignorance.
Reply Quote
1 edit
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 7:31p, 2/12/26
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Massie is on his way out. Getting creamed in the polls. Call this his last hurrah I guess

Yeah no.



Guess what, people in rural Kentucky aren't as dumb as the average MAGA ******.





That's not a poll it's a predictive market. Also, nobody here is protecting pedos or pushing to protect pedos. I have yet to see one poster say they don't want all the files released. Ridiculous claim you're making there





Your source is literally that meme







Quote:
Please show me where I attacked Massie in my above post? I said two facts and an opinion. None were attacking Massie.

Are you still pretending you weren't disparaging Massie with that post calling his supporters "Masswipes"?



Not pretending anything. I wasn't disparaging Massie. I posted the tweet for the chart provided which you've ignored entirely. And the post you quoted me in isn't even the post Wags was referring to lol

Are you suggesting the FEC filings are inaccurate?


You were clearly being hypocritical when claiming you weren't disparaging Massie.



Nope I wasn't because I added no personal opinion about Massie at all

You quoted that tweet in defense of your argument. The logical assumption is that you agreed with it. You post someone else's name calling, you own it too.


Where did I name call? As stated, I posted the tweet for the chart.

Dance, dance, dance.
Spin, spin, spin.
Weasel, weasel, weasel.

You chose to post a tweet calling other people Masswipes, you own it.


He's clearly not arguing in good faith.


lol you're all just missing the reason I posted that tweet even though I've explained myself multiple times. He's more popular in terms of political donations in California than he is in his own state.


Go ahead and post the percentage of total donations from Kentucky that the astroturfed Trump Pedo Swamp tool running against Massie got, for ****s and giggles.

Your sources are crap, if you rely on them and don't bother to do a minimum of due diligence, you're going to look even worse than you usually do.



Your view of me means absolutely nothing to my life lol. It's not my fault you're entirely missing the point because you have some hard on for Massie. I know his opponent is heavily funded from out of state. You all keep saying Massie is so loved in Kentucky but he isn't getting monetary support from Kentucky. Why?

Wasn't Trump outspent by the Hillary and Kamala campaigns? Why didn't he lose? Has anyone looked into this?
Reply Quote
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 7:33p, 2/12/26
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Massie is on his way out. Getting creamed in the polls. Call this his last hurrah I guess

Yeah no.



Guess what, people in rural Kentucky aren't as dumb as the average MAGA ******.





That's not a poll it's a predictive market. Also, nobody here is protecting pedos or pushing to protect pedos. I have yet to see one poster say they don't want all the files released. Ridiculous claim you're making there





Your source is literally that meme







Quote:
Please show me where I attacked Massie in my above post? I said two facts and an opinion. None were attacking Massie.

Are you still pretending you weren't disparaging Massie with that post calling his supporters "Masswipes"?



Not pretending anything. I wasn't disparaging Massie. I posted the tweet for the chart provided which you've ignored entirely. And the post you quoted me in isn't even the post Wags was referring to lol

Are you suggesting the FEC filings are inaccurate?


You were clearly being hypocritical when claiming you weren't disparaging Massie.



Nope I wasn't because I added no personal opinion about Massie at all

You quoted that tweet in defense of your argument. The logical assumption is that you agreed with it. You post someone else's name calling, you own it too.


Where did I name call? As stated, I posted the tweet for the chart.

Dance, dance, dance.
Spin, spin, spin.
Weasel, weasel, weasel.

You chose to post a tweet calling other people Masswipes, you own it.


He's clearly not arguing in good faith.




Dumb attempt to swiftboat Massie.

The tweet that you've posted yourself shows that Jeff Yass is backing libertarians like Rand Paul, and that his motivation here is for free speech and against censorship of TikTok, which in fact is something hardcore zonists like the billionaires who back his opponent or the archzionist Ellison who bought TikTok and CBS with the help of Trump and the zioswamp in order to shut down online criticism of the Gaza genocide.




The other grossly egregious aspect is that Yass' donation is tiny next to that of the archzionist megabillionaires Adelson, Singer and co, who have pumped millions into the astroturfed opponent of Massie.

I think in this case your argumentation is more about deception than plain ignorance.


I thought you didn't like Zionists running our elections? Now it's okay because it's not that much and you like Massie?
Reply Quote
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 7:34p, 2/12/26
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Massie is on his way out. Getting creamed in the polls. Call this his last hurrah I guess

Yeah no.



Guess what, people in rural Kentucky aren't as dumb as the average MAGA ******.





That's not a poll it's a predictive market. Also, nobody here is protecting pedos or pushing to protect pedos. I have yet to see one poster say they don't want all the files released. Ridiculous claim you're making there





Your source is literally that meme







Quote:
Please show me where I attacked Massie in my above post? I said two facts and an opinion. None were attacking Massie.

Are you still pretending you weren't disparaging Massie with that post calling his supporters "Masswipes"?



Not pretending anything. I wasn't disparaging Massie. I posted the tweet for the chart provided which you've ignored entirely. And the post you quoted me in isn't even the post Wags was referring to lol

Are you suggesting the FEC filings are inaccurate?


You were clearly being hypocritical when claiming you weren't disparaging Massie.



Nope I wasn't because I added no personal opinion about Massie at all

You quoted that tweet in defense of your argument. The logical assumption is that you agreed with it. You post someone else's name calling, you own it too.


Where did I name call? As stated, I posted the tweet for the chart.

Dance, dance, dance.
Spin, spin, spin.
Weasel, weasel, weasel.

You chose to post a tweet calling other people Masswipes, you own it.


He's clearly not arguing in good faith.


lol you're all just missing the reason I posted that tweet even though I've explained myself multiple times. He's more popular in terms of political donations in California than he is in his own state.


Go ahead and post the percentage of total donations from Kentucky that the astroturfed Trump Pedo Swamp tool running against Massie got, for ****s and giggles.

Your sources are crap, if you rely on them and don't bother to do a minimum of due diligence, you're going to look even worse than you usually do.



Your view of me means absolutely nothing to my life lol. It's not my fault you're entirely missing the point because you have some hard on for Massie. I know his opponent is heavily funded from out of state. You all keep saying Massie is so loved in Kentucky but he isn't getting monetary support from Kentucky. Why?

Wasn't Trump outspent by the Hillary and Kamala campaigns? Why didn't he lose? Has anyone looked into this?


Kamala was a terrible candidate. Hilary, less so, but she did her best to lose the election. Plus people were mad about Bernie
Reply Quote
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aunburdened • 7:35p, 2/12/26
Aunburdened said:
BearlySane88 said:
Aunburdened said:
BearlySane88 said:
Aunburdened said:
BearlySane88 said:
Aunburdened said:
BearlySane88 said:
Massie is on his way out. Getting creamed in the polls. Call this his last hurrah I guess

Doubtful.
https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/07/politics/massie-trump-paul-kentucky-primary

It only matters how the people in the 4th Congressional District feel about Massie. How he polls with the rest of the country is irrelevant.


It's just very interesting that 25% of his funding comes from California. Only 4% from Kentucky

Not when you consider where his opponent's funding comes from.

My point is, the claim is he's very popular in Kentucky but his funding doesn't match that

Your point is weak. You need to look at voter support, not monetary support.


That's exactly what I'm saying lol. Why doesn't voter support match monetary support? If he's so loved in Kentucky, why isn't he getting the donor support from Kentucky?

Maybe people in Kentucky have better things to do with their money than spend it on politicians.

Stop making BS arguments.


Yours is a BS argument. If Kentuckians were so happy with Massie, they would donate.
Reply Quote
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:36p, 2/12/26
Reply Quote
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:39p, 2/12/26
Reply Quote
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 7:43p, 2/12/26
BearlySane88 said:


Yours is a BS argument. If Kentuckians were so happy with Massie, they would donate.


Cool story.
Rent Free Living in Domes 24/7/52
Reply Quote
5 edits
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 7:46p, 2/12/26
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Massie is on his way out. Getting creamed in the polls. Call this his last hurrah I guess

Yeah no.



Guess what, people in rural Kentucky aren't as dumb as the average MAGA ******.





That's not a poll it's a predictive market. Also, nobody here is protecting pedos or pushing to protect pedos. I have yet to see one poster say they don't want all the files released. Ridiculous claim you're making there





Your source is literally that meme







Quote:
Please show me where I attacked Massie in my above post? I said two facts and an opinion. None were attacking Massie.

Are you still pretending you weren't disparaging Massie with that post calling his supporters "Masswipes"?



Not pretending anything. I wasn't disparaging Massie. I posted the tweet for the chart provided which you've ignored entirely. And the post you quoted me in isn't even the post Wags was referring to lol

Are you suggesting the FEC filings are inaccurate?


You were clearly being hypocritical when claiming you weren't disparaging Massie.



Nope I wasn't because I added no personal opinion about Massie at all

You quoted that tweet in defense of your argument. The logical assumption is that you agreed with it. You post someone else's name calling, you own it too.


Where did I name call? As stated, I posted the tweet for the chart.

Dance, dance, dance.
Spin, spin, spin.
Weasel, weasel, weasel.

You chose to post a tweet calling other people Masswipes, you own it.


He's clearly not arguing in good faith.


lol you're all just missing the reason I posted that tweet even though I've explained myself multiple times. He's more popular in terms of political donations in California than he is in his own state.


Go ahead and post the percentage of total donations from Kentucky that the astroturfed Trump Pedo Swamp tool running against Massie got, for ****s and giggles.

Your sources are crap, if you rely on them and don't bother to do a minimum of due diligence, you're going to look even worse than you usually do.



Your view of me means absolutely nothing to my life lol. It's not my fault you're entirely missing the point because you have some hard on for Massie. I know his opponent is heavily funded from out of state. You all keep saying Massie is so loved in Kentucky but he isn't getting monetary support from Kentucky. Why?


What you're still hiding here is that his opponent is a lot more heavily funded from outside sources than Massie. It's kind of embarrassingly dumb to try to swiftboat him on this when his opponent is clearly far worse.

The Massie reelection campaign became national because Trump's zionist backers told him to go after Massie, one of the very few Congressmen who do not kowtow to AIPAC and crossed their red line by not being a Bibi bootlicker. Adelson and Singer poured millions against Massie, so Massie appealed to patriots from all over the country.

It is a given that Massie, despite this national appeal for donations, is going to be heavily outspent by his Trump Pedo Swamp opponent. However it looks like he might become the first Congressman in history who was able to stand up to AIPAC and that is something that every patriot should celebrate.
Reply Quote
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 8:13p, 2/12/26
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Massie is on his way out. Getting creamed in the polls. Call this his last hurrah I guess

Yeah no.



Guess what, people in rural Kentucky aren't as dumb as the average MAGA ******.





That's not a poll it's a predictive market. Also, nobody here is protecting pedos or pushing to protect pedos. I have yet to see one poster say they don't want all the files released. Ridiculous claim you're making there





Your source is literally that meme







Quote:
Please show me where I attacked Massie in my above post? I said two facts and an opinion. None were attacking Massie.

Are you still pretending you weren't disparaging Massie with that post calling his supporters "Masswipes"?



Not pretending anything. I wasn't disparaging Massie. I posted the tweet for the chart provided which you've ignored entirely. And the post you quoted me in isn't even the post Wags was referring to lol

Are you suggesting the FEC filings are inaccurate?


You were clearly being hypocritical when claiming you weren't disparaging Massie.



Nope I wasn't because I added no personal opinion about Massie at all

You quoted that tweet in defense of your argument. The logical assumption is that you agreed with it. You post someone else's name calling, you own it too.


Where did I name call? As stated, I posted the tweet for the chart.

Dance, dance, dance.
Spin, spin, spin.
Weasel, weasel, weasel.

You chose to post a tweet calling other people Masswipes, you own it.


He's clearly not arguing in good faith.


lol you're all just missing the reason I posted that tweet even though I've explained myself multiple times. He's more popular in terms of political donations in California than he is in his own state.


Go ahead and post the percentage of total donations from Kentucky that the astroturfed Trump Pedo Swamp tool running against Massie got, for ****s and giggles.

Your sources are crap, if you rely on them and don't bother to do a minimum of due diligence, you're going to look even worse than you usually do.



Your view of me means absolutely nothing to my life lol. It's not my fault you're entirely missing the point because you have some hard on for Massie. I know his opponent is heavily funded from out of state. You all keep saying Massie is so loved in Kentucky but he isn't getting monetary support from Kentucky. Why?


What you're still hiding here is that his opponent is a lot more heavily funded from outside sources than Massie. It's kind of embarrassingly dumb to try to swiftboat him on this when his opponent is clearly far worse.

The Massie reelection campaign became national because Trump's zionist backers told him to go after Massie, one of the very few Congressmen who do not kowtow to AIPAC and crossed their red line by not being a Bibi bootlicker. Adelson and Singer poured millions against Massie, so Massie appealed to patriots from all over the country.

It is a given that Massie, despite this national appeal for donations, is going to be heavily outspent by his Trump Pedo Swamp opponent. However it looks like he might become the first Congressman in history who was able to stand up to AIPAC and that is something that every patriot should celebrate.


I'm not hiding anything. My post had absolutely nothing to do with his opponent which is why I mentioned nothing about his opponent or donations to him.

You all keep claiming he's popular in Kentucky but isn't receiving much funding from within Kentucky. Why is that? None of you have answered that. Wags couldn't answer it so he hit me with a "cool story," his go to when he has no argument to make.

Yass is a Zionist who is funding him. He's avoiding taking money from AIPAC by taking it straight from Yass. You can't claim you're not taking Israeli money when you're taking Israeli money. $32,000 from Yass directly. $192,000 from Club for Growth, funded by Yass. Yass has made donations exceeding $16 mil to pro-Israel and anti-Muslim/anti-Iran groups. He's a Zionist through and through.
Reply Quote
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:23a, 2/13/26
Epstein and his Inside Leaker in UK on banking matters.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DUlSorMElFk/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
Reply Quote
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 12:51a, 2/13/26
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Massie is on his way out. Getting creamed in the polls. Call this his last hurrah I guess

Yeah no.



Guess what, people in rural Kentucky aren't as dumb as the average MAGA ******.





That's not a poll it's a predictive market. Also, nobody here is protecting pedos or pushing to protect pedos. I have yet to see one poster say they don't want all the files released. Ridiculous claim you're making there





Your source is literally that meme







Quote:
Please show me where I attacked Massie in my above post? I said two facts and an opinion. None were attacking Massie.

Are you still pretending you weren't disparaging Massie with that post calling his supporters "Masswipes"?



Not pretending anything. I wasn't disparaging Massie. I posted the tweet for the chart provided which you've ignored entirely. And the post you quoted me in isn't even the post Wags was referring to lol

Are you suggesting the FEC filings are inaccurate?


You were clearly being hypocritical when claiming you weren't disparaging Massie.



Nope I wasn't because I added no personal opinion about Massie at all

You quoted that tweet in defense of your argument. The logical assumption is that you agreed with it. You post someone else's name calling, you own it too.


Where did I name call? As stated, I posted the tweet for the chart.

Dance, dance, dance.
Spin, spin, spin.
Weasel, weasel, weasel.

You chose to post a tweet calling other people Masswipes, you own it.


He's clearly not arguing in good faith.


lol you're all just missing the reason I posted that tweet even though I've explained myself multiple times. He's more popular in terms of political donations in California than he is in his own state.


Go ahead and post the percentage of total donations from Kentucky that the astroturfed Trump Pedo Swamp tool running against Massie got, for ****s and giggles.

Your sources are crap, if you rely on them and don't bother to do a minimum of due diligence, you're going to look even worse than you usually do.



Your view of me means absolutely nothing to my life lol. It's not my fault you're entirely missing the point because you have some hard on for Massie. I know his opponent is heavily funded from out of state. You all keep saying Massie is so loved in Kentucky but he isn't getting monetary support from Kentucky. Why?


What you're still hiding here is that his opponent is a lot more heavily funded from outside sources than Massie. It's kind of embarrassingly dumb to try to swiftboat him on this when his opponent is clearly far worse.

The Massie reelection campaign became national because Trump's zionist backers told him to go after Massie, one of the very few Congressmen who do not kowtow to AIPAC and crossed their red line by not being a Bibi bootlicker. Adelson and Singer poured millions against Massie, so Massie appealed to patriots from all over the country.

It is a given that Massie, despite this national appeal for donations, is going to be heavily outspent by his Trump Pedo Swamp opponent. However it looks like he might become the first Congressman in history who was able to stand up to AIPAC and that is something that every patriot should celebrate.


I'm not hiding anything. My post had absolutely nothing to do with his opponent which is why I mentioned nothing about his opponent or donations to him.

You all keep claiming he's popular in Kentucky but isn't receiving much funding from within Kentucky. Why is that? None of you have answered that. Wags couldn't answer it so he hit me with a "cool story," his go to when he has no argument to make.

Yass is a Zionist who is funding him. He's avoiding taking money from AIPAC by taking it straight from Yass. You can't claim you're not taking Israeli money when you're taking Israeli money. $32,000 from Yass directly. $192,000 from Club for Growth, funded by Yass. Yass has made donations exceeding $16 mil to pro-Israel and anti-Muslim/anti-Iran groups. He's a Zionist through and through.

Quote:
"As a libertarian, Jeff generally opposes American involvement in foreign affairs as evidenced by his support for Rand Paul and Thomas Massie," the spokesperson said.

https://israelpalestinenews.org/billionaire-jeff-yass-linked-to-donations-to-anti-muslim-and-pro-israel-groups/

He may be a Zionist, but if he's supporting Massie he's backing the wrong candidate. He should be backing his opponent who is bankrolled by AIPAC with far more money than Massie got from Yass, who says his #1 issue is school choice.



Continue on with your intellectually dishonest trolling though.
Reply Quote
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aunburdened • 5:18a, 2/13/26
Reply Quote
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:21a, 2/13/26
Reply Quote
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aunburdened • 5:41a, 2/13/26
Aunburdened said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Massie is on his way out. Getting creamed in the polls. Call this his last hurrah I guess

Yeah no.



Guess what, people in rural Kentucky aren't as dumb as the average MAGA ******.





That's not a poll it's a predictive market. Also, nobody here is protecting pedos or pushing to protect pedos. I have yet to see one poster say they don't want all the files released. Ridiculous claim you're making there





Your source is literally that meme







Quote:
Please show me where I attacked Massie in my above post? I said two facts and an opinion. None were attacking Massie.

Are you still pretending you weren't disparaging Massie with that post calling his supporters "Masswipes"?



Not pretending anything. I wasn't disparaging Massie. I posted the tweet for the chart provided which you've ignored entirely. And the post you quoted me in isn't even the post Wags was referring to lol

Are you suggesting the FEC filings are inaccurate?


You were clearly being hypocritical when claiming you weren't disparaging Massie.



Nope I wasn't because I added no personal opinion about Massie at all

You quoted that tweet in defense of your argument. The logical assumption is that you agreed with it. You post someone else's name calling, you own it too.


Where did I name call? As stated, I posted the tweet for the chart.

Dance, dance, dance.
Spin, spin, spin.
Weasel, weasel, weasel.

You chose to post a tweet calling other people Masswipes, you own it.


He's clearly not arguing in good faith.


lol you're all just missing the reason I posted that tweet even though I've explained myself multiple times. He's more popular in terms of political donations in California than he is in his own state.


Go ahead and post the percentage of total donations from Kentucky that the astroturfed Trump Pedo Swamp tool running against Massie got, for ****s and giggles.

Your sources are crap, if you rely on them and don't bother to do a minimum of due diligence, you're going to look even worse than you usually do.



Your view of me means absolutely nothing to my life lol. It's not my fault you're entirely missing the point because you have some hard on for Massie. I know his opponent is heavily funded from out of state. You all keep saying Massie is so loved in Kentucky but he isn't getting monetary support from Kentucky. Why?


What you're still hiding here is that his opponent is a lot more heavily funded from outside sources than Massie. It's kind of embarrassingly dumb to try to swiftboat him on this when his opponent is clearly far worse.

The Massie reelection campaign became national because Trump's zionist backers told him to go after Massie, one of the very few Congressmen who do not kowtow to AIPAC and crossed their red line by not being a Bibi bootlicker. Adelson and Singer poured millions against Massie, so Massie appealed to patriots from all over the country.

It is a given that Massie, despite this national appeal for donations, is going to be heavily outspent by his Trump Pedo Swamp opponent. However it looks like he might become the first Congressman in history who was able to stand up to AIPAC and that is something that every patriot should celebrate.


I'm not hiding anything. My post had absolutely nothing to do with his opponent which is why I mentioned nothing about his opponent or donations to him.

You all keep claiming he's popular in Kentucky but isn't receiving much funding from within Kentucky. Why is that? None of you have answered that. Wags couldn't answer it so he hit me with a "cool story," his go to when he has no argument to make.

Yass is a Zionist who is funding him. He's avoiding taking money from AIPAC by taking it straight from Yass. You can't claim you're not taking Israeli money when you're taking Israeli money. $32,000 from Yass directly. $192,000 from Club for Growth, funded by Yass. Yass has made donations exceeding $16 mil to pro-Israel and anti-Muslim/anti-Iran groups. He's a Zionist through and through.

Quote:
"As a libertarian, Jeff generally opposes American involvement in foreign affairs as evidenced by his support for Rand Paul and Thomas Massie," the spokesperson said.

https://israelpalestinenews.org/billionaire-jeff-yass-linked-to-donations-to-anti-muslim-and-pro-israel-groups/

He may be a Zionist, but if he's supporting Massie he's backing the wrong candidate. He should be backing his opponent who is bankrolled by AIPAC with far more money than Massie got from Yass, who says his #1 issue is school choice.


Continue on with your intellectually dishonest trolling though.


Yass is a Zionist and he supports Zionist causes. I'm gonna move on from this in this thread as it's not on topic but feel free to continue it elsewhere if you'd like
Reply Quote
1 edit
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:58a, 2/13/26


Not Epstein related but it's interesting/disgusting and has some connections
Reply Quote
concordtom
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:13a, 2/13/26


Epstein the blackmailer
Reply Quote
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:04a, 2/13/26
Reply Quote
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:18a, 2/13/26
Kathryn Ruemmler (Democrat) has resigned her corporate money gig with Goldman Sachs as her close relationship with Uncle Jeffrey (Democrat) is revealed.

Former White House legal counsel / fixer to Barack Obama, and former personal lawyer / fixer of Susan Rice, Ruemmler was Chief Legal Counsel for GS the past six years.
Reply Quote
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 10:32a, 2/13/26
Good.

Former Prime Minister of Norway arrested over Epstein files revelations:

Reply Quote
2 edits
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 10:36a, 2/13/26
movielover said:
Kathryn Ruemmler (Democrat) has resigned her corporate money gig with Goldman Sachs as her close relationship with Uncle Jeffrey (Democrat) is revealed.

Former White House legal counsel / fixer to Barack Obama, and former personal lawyer / fixer of Susan Rice, Ruemmler was Chief Legal Counsel for GS the past six years.

Love watching all these Democrats go down in service of their obsession with trying to get Trump on this.
Reply Quote
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:56a, 2/13/26
Reply Quote
1 edit
Anarchistbear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:59a, 2/13/26
It's about prostitution- some are paid better than others.
Reply Quote
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:03p, 2/13/26

Reply Quote
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 12:14p, 2/13/26
movielover said:
Kathryn Ruemmler (Democrat) has resigned her corporate money gig with Goldman Sachs as her close relationship with Uncle Jeffrey (Democrat) is revealed.

Former White House legal counsel / fixer to Barack Obama, and former personal lawyer / fixer of Susan Rice, Ruemmler was Chief Legal Counsel for GS the past six years.


Reply Quote
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to brobear • 12:29p, 2/13/26
FLAGGED
Reply Quote
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 12:30p, 2/13/26
Number skewed by went Cheeto was a Dem
Reply Quote
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aunburdened • 12:31p, 2/13/26
I'm willing to lose a scuzzy Goldman Sachs counsel to get the big one

It's coming bruh

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE GAVIN

ICE OUT
Reply Quote
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 1:02p, 2/13/26
SBGold said:
Number skewed by went Cheeto was a Dem


Did Trump ever run for office as a dem?
Reply Quote
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 1:02p, 2/13/26
SBGold said:
I'm willing to lose a scuzzy Goldman Sachs counsel to get the big one

It's coming bruh

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE GAVIN

ICE OUT


Yall been saying that for the last decade
Reply Quote
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.