Operation Epic Furry Energy Crisis Thread

14,304 Views | 350 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by BearGoggles
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

BearlySane88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

BearlySane88 said:

Less safe how exactly? Illegal border crossings are down, murders are down.. sounds a lot safer to me

Nice goalpost shift. Dajo was clearly talking about diplomacy vs starting foreign wars.


He made a broad statement about America being less safe. I asked how. Even in relation to diplomacy, how is America less safe?

Have you seen any evidence that the Trump administration had plans to evacuate American citizens from the Middle East?


Now that's moving the goal posts. I said America, not Americans overseas.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
brobear said:

democrats do nothing but hate everything Trump related, it's an easy and true connection to make

you weren't one of the 77 million Trump voters so stop assuming you know what they think and feel. nobody is surprised that Trump attacked Iran. he's been talking about it since the '80s

Why didn't Trump attack Iran during his first term then? They were hostile to the US then too.
brobear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

brobear said:

democrats do nothing but hate everything Trump related, it's an easy and true connection to make

you weren't one of the 77 million Trump voters so stop assuming you know what they think and feel. nobody is surprised that Trump attacked Iran. he's been talking about it since the '80s

Why didn't Trump attack Iran during his first term then? They were hostile to the US then too.


the time was right. couldn't pass it up
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

BearlySane88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

BearlySane88 said:

Less safe how exactly? Illegal border crossings are down, murders are down.. sounds a lot safer to me

Nice goalpost shift. Dajo was clearly talking about diplomacy vs starting foreign wars.


He made a broad statement about America being less safe. I asked how. Even in relation to diplomacy, how is America less safe?

Have you seen any evidence that the Trump administration had plans to evacuate American citizens from the Middle East?


Now that's moving the goal posts. I said America, not Americans overseas.

They aren't Americans too? Isn't America made up of American citizens?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

BearlySane88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

BearlySane88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

BearlySane88 said:

Less safe how exactly? Illegal border crossings are down, murders are down.. sounds a lot safer to me

Nice goalpost shift. Dajo was clearly talking about diplomacy vs starting foreign wars.


He made a broad statement about America being less safe. I asked how. Even in relation to diplomacy, how is America less safe?

Have you seen any evidence that the Trump administration had plans to evacuate American citizens from the Middle East?


Now that's moving the goal posts. I said America, not Americans overseas.

They aren't Americans too? Isn't America made up of American citizens?


Now you're just arguing to argue. I said what I said very specifically, read it or don't. That's up to you
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Clown show
Censorship has always been a tool of the fascist
brobear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
good description of the democratic party for sure
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
brobear said:

democrats do nothing but hate everything Trump related, it's an easy and true connection to make

you weren't one of the 77 million Trump voters so stop assuming you know what they think and feel. nobody is surprised that Trump attacked Iran. he's been talking about it since the '80s


Cool story.

That's not the platform he campaigned on.
Not even close.

Thanks for the amazing spin.



BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Clown show


Sock puppet show.




You're just mad when this place isn't a liberal circle jerk
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Clown show


Sock puppet show.




You're just mad when this place isn't a liberal circle jerk


Another cool story.
Im not a liberal.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Clown show


Sock puppet show.




You're just mad when this place isn't a liberal circle jerk


Another cool story.
Im not a liberal.



You fooled all of us.

Let me clarify, you're just mad when this place isn't a TDS circle jerk
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Clown show


Sock puppet show.




You're just mad when this place isn't a liberal circle jerk


Another cool story.
Im not a liberal.



You fooled all of us.

Let me clarify, you're just mad when this place isn't a TDS circle jerk


I've noticed that you aren't real good when it comes to paying attention to details. If you were, you would have noticed that Im not a fan of Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren.

Its shocking that you've missed this.
Given that you literally reply to over 90% of my posts.

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Clown show


Sock puppet show.




You're just mad when this place isn't a liberal circle jerk


Another cool story.
Im not a liberal.



You fooled all of us.

Let me clarify, you're just mad when this place isn't a TDS circle jerk


I've noticed that you aren't real good when it comes to paying attention to details. If you were, you would have noticed that Im not a fan of Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren.

Its shocking that you've missed this.
Given that you literally reply to over 90% of my posts.




Oh good lord, learn to do math before spouting statistics.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Clown show


Sock puppet show.




You're just mad when this place isn't a liberal circle jerk


Another cool story.
Im not a liberal.



You fooled all of us.

Let me clarify, you're just mad when this place isn't a TDS circle jerk


I've noticed that you aren't real good when it comes to paying attention to details. If you were, you would have noticed that Im not a fan of Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren.

Its shocking that you've missed this.
Given that you literally reply to over 90% of my posts.




Oh good lord, learn to do math before spouting statistics.



+1000
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Clown show


Sock puppet show.




You're just mad when this place isn't a liberal circle jerk


Another cool story.
Im not a liberal.



You fooled all of us.

Let me clarify, you're just mad when this place isn't a TDS circle jerk


I've noticed that you aren't real good when it comes to paying attention to details. If you were, you would have noticed that Im not a fan of Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren.

Its shocking that you've missed this.
Given that you literally reply to over 90% of my posts.




Oh good lord, learn to do math before spouting statistics.



I've got $5,000 that says Im good at Math.
Wanna play?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Clown show


Sock puppet show.




You're just mad when this place isn't a liberal circle jerk


Another cool story.
Im not a liberal.



You fooled all of us.

Let me clarify, you're just mad when this place isn't a TDS circle jerk


I've noticed that you aren't real good when it comes to paying attention to details. If you were, you would have noticed that Im not a fan of Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren.

Its shocking that you've missed this.
Given that you literally reply to over 90% of my posts.




Oh good lord, learn to do math before spouting statistics.



I've got $5,000 that says Im good at Math.
Wanna play?



You just said literally 90% of your posts I respond to. Go ahead, spend your evening doing that math to prove it. Donate the 5k to Cal football when you're done proving yourself wrong
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

The sock puppets are out in full force tonight.
Just look at ALL OF THOSE STARS!




You really need to find some better hobbies. It's getting to your head bro
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Clown show


Sock puppet show.




You're just mad when this place isn't a liberal circle jerk


Another cool story.
Im not a liberal.



You fooled all of us.

Let me clarify, you're just mad when this place isn't a TDS circle jerk


I've noticed that you aren't real good when it comes to paying attention to details. If you were, you would have noticed that Im not a fan of Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren.

Its shocking that you've missed this.
Given that you literally reply to over 90% of my posts.




Oh good lord, learn to do math before spouting statistics.



I've got $5,000 that says Im good at Math.
Wanna play?



You just said literally 90% of your posts I respond to. Go ahead, spend your evening doing that math to prove it


Yes, I know what I said.
And I stand by it.

I guess you're not interested in making $5,000.
Lolz.

Shocker.

oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Clown show


Sock puppet show.




You're just mad when this place isn't a liberal circle jerk


Another cool story.
Im not a liberal.



You fooled all of us.

Let me clarify, you're just mad when this place isn't a TDS circle jerk


I've noticed that you aren't real good when it comes to paying attention to details. If you were, you would have noticed that Im not a fan of Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren.

Its shocking that you've missed this.
Given that you literally reply to over 90% of my posts.




Oh good lord, learn to do math before spouting statistics.



I've got $5,000 that says Im good at Math.
Wanna play?



You just said literally 90% of your posts I respond to. Go ahead, spend your evening doing that math to prove it. Donate the 5k to Cal football when you're done proving yourself wrong


He is either bad at math or a liar, or both.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Clown show


Sock puppet show.




You're just mad when this place isn't a liberal circle jerk


Another cool story.
Im not a liberal.



You fooled all of us.

Let me clarify, you're just mad when this place isn't a TDS circle jerk


I've noticed that you aren't real good when it comes to paying attention to details. If you were, you would have noticed that Im not a fan of Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren.

Its shocking that you've missed this.
Given that you literally reply to over 90% of my posts.




Oh good lord, learn to do math before spouting statistics.



I've got $5,000 that says Im good at Math.
Wanna play?



You just said literally 90% of your posts I respond to. Go ahead, spend your evening doing that math to prove it. Donate the 5k to Cal football when you're done proving yourself wrong


He is either bad at math or a liar, or both.


Im pretty good at math.
Im willing to put up $5000 to find out just how good I am.

How about you bro?
Can you put up $5,000?

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Clown show


Sock puppet show.




You're just mad when this place isn't a liberal circle jerk


Another cool story.
Im not a liberal.



You fooled all of us.

Let me clarify, you're just mad when this place isn't a TDS circle jerk


I've noticed that you aren't real good when it comes to paying attention to details. If you were, you would have noticed that Im not a fan of Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren.

Its shocking that you've missed this.
Given that you literally reply to over 90% of my posts.




Oh good lord, learn to do math before spouting statistics.



I've got $5,000 that says Im good at Math.
Wanna play?



You just said literally 90% of your posts I respond to. Go ahead, spend your evening doing that math to prove it


Yes, I know what I said.
And I stand by it.

I guess you're not interested in making $5,000.
Lolz.

Shocker.




Do the math for us then. Like I said, when you're wrong you can donate the 5k to Cal football
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Clown show


Sock puppet show.




You're just mad when this place isn't a liberal circle jerk


Another cool story.
Im not a liberal.



You fooled all of us.

Let me clarify, you're just mad when this place isn't a TDS circle jerk


I've noticed that you aren't real good when it comes to paying attention to details. If you were, you would have noticed that Im not a fan of Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren.

Its shocking that you've missed this.
Given that you literally reply to over 90% of my posts.




Oh good lord, learn to do math before spouting statistics.



I've got $5,000 that says Im good at Math.
Wanna play?



You just said literally 90% of your posts I respond to. Go ahead, spend your evening doing that math to prove it


Yes, I know what I said.
And I stand by it.

I guess you're not interested in making $5,000.
Lolz.

Shocker.




Do the math for us then. Like I said, when you're wrong you can donate the 5k to Cal football


I made the offer.
Its up to you to do the work.

$5,000.
BearGoggles
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

What I find truly remarkable about your post is how easily you are able to succumb to turning this into a nice, neat, little box of partisan politics and Democrats vs Republicans, even using the TDS card.

For some puzzling reason, you conveniently ignore the FACT that Trump ran his election campaign primarily on an American First! doctrine and being the peace president with No New Wars.

I would imagine that there are a large number of those 77 million voters that voted for Trump in 2024 and believed his campaign promises . . . particularly America First! and No New Wars.

I would also imagine that many of them feel betrayed now.
But instead of mentioning this, you do nothing more than default to Dems vs Republicans.

Shocker.



One big tell of your most egregious instances of mendacity on this board is when you reply to a post without quoting it (or quoting it only in part), like you did above. When I see that, I know a lie or dodge is embedded in your response. The above is exactly that.

I said nothing about democrats vs republicans. I simply pointed out that many, like you, seem to be rooting against Trump when that means rooting against our country. You could disabuse me of that notion by simply posting "I hope Trump's military action is successful and that there is regime change in Iran to a more pro-western government." Can you say that?

Beyond that, I was pointing out the hypocrisy of many on this board when it comes to gas prices. You, again, are exhibit A for that since you love to post random pictures of high gas prices and then blame trump even though CA gas prices have been absurdly high since forever. And when you know that the gas prices will return to normal as soon as the military action is over.

Regarding the substance of your post - because unlike you I will respond - Trump also ran on the platform that Iran would not obtain a nuclear bomb under his watch. Just like all of the presidents since Reagan. Trump's America First platform is consistent with that - if you believe Iran having a bomb (or for that matter ballistic missiles) is against America's vital interest. Clearly Trump believes that, since his platform has always said as such.

My guess is that 80-90% of Americans don't want Iran to have nukes with missiles that reach Europe and the USA. If you and dem politicians choose to be on the other side of that issue, god bless you. So I'll ask directly - do you feel that Iran having a nuclear bomb and/or ballistic missiles that can reach Europe or the USA is an acceptable risk for the USA?

Some of Trump's supporters are upset with the Iran military action. They are in the minority. Recent polls suggest that 80%+ of republicans support Trump's Iran actions. That will change if: (i) there are mass American casualties; (ii) the hostilities drag on for more than a few months; and/or (iii) there are ground troops inserted for anything more than special forces missions.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Clown show


Sock puppet show.




You're just mad when this place isn't a liberal circle jerk


Another cool story.
Im not a liberal.



You fooled all of us.

Let me clarify, you're just mad when this place isn't a TDS circle jerk


I've noticed that you aren't real good when it comes to paying attention to details. If you were, you would have noticed that Im not a fan of Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren.

Its shocking that you've missed this.
Given that you literally reply to over 90% of my posts.




Oh good lord, learn to do math before spouting statistics.



I've got $5,000 that says Im good at Math.
Wanna play?



You just said literally 90% of your posts I respond to. Go ahead, spend your evening doing that math to prove it


Yes, I know what I said.
And I stand by it.

I guess you're not interested in making $5,000.
Lolz.

Shocker.




Do the math for us then. Like I said, when you're wrong you can donate the 5k to Cal football


I made the offer.
Its up to you to do the work.

$5,000.



You're the one claiming to be good at math but want to the push the work onto someone else. You're goofy bro
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

oski003 said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Clown show


Sock puppet show.




You're just mad when this place isn't a liberal circle jerk


Another cool story.
Im not a liberal.



You fooled all of us.

Let me clarify, you're just mad when this place isn't a TDS circle jerk


I've noticed that you aren't real good when it comes to paying attention to details. If you were, you would have noticed that Im not a fan of Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren.

Its shocking that you've missed this.
Given that you literally reply to over 90% of my posts.




Oh good lord, learn to do math before spouting statistics.



I've got $5,000 that says Im good at Math.
Wanna play?



You just said literally 90% of your posts I respond to. Go ahead, spend your evening doing that math to prove it. Donate the 5k to Cal football when you're done proving yourself wrong


He is either bad at math or a liar, or both.


Im pretty good at math.
Im willing to put up $5000 to find out just how good I am.

How about you bro?
Can you put up $5,000?




Please just post with honesty. It can't be that difficult.
BearGoggles
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Clown show


Sock puppet show.




You're just mad when this place isn't a liberal circle jerk


Another cool story.
Im not a liberal.



You fooled all of us.

Let me clarify, you're just mad when this place isn't a TDS circle jerk


I've noticed that you aren't real good when it comes to paying attention to details. If you were, you would have noticed that Im not a fan of Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren.

Its shocking that you've missed this.
Given that you literally reply to over 90% of my posts.




Oh good lord, learn to do math before spouting statistics.



I've got $5,000 that says Im good at Math.
Wanna play?



You just said literally 90% of your posts I respond to. Go ahead, spend your evening doing that math to prove it


Yes, I know what I said.
And I stand by it.

I guess you're not interested in making $5,000.
Lolz.

Shocker.




Do the math for us then. Like I said, when you're wrong you can donate the 5k to Cal football


I made the offer.
Its up to you to do the work.

$5,000.


I just did the math. By my calculations, BearlySane88 responds to less than 90% of your posts.

Please pay up the $5,000.

Of course, if you dispute this, you're free to do the math on your end and prove me wrong.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearGoggles said:

DiabloWags said:

What I find truly remarkable about your post is how easily you are able to succumb to turning this into a nice, neat, little box of partisan politics and Democrats vs Republicans, even using the TDS card.

For some puzzling reason, you conveniently ignore the FACT that Trump ran his election campaign primarily on an American First! doctrine and being the peace president with No New Wars.

I would imagine that there are a large number of those 77 million voters that voted for Trump in 2024 and believed his campaign promises . . . particularly America First! and No New Wars.

I would also imagine that many of them feel betrayed now.
But instead of mentioning this, you do nothing more than default to Dems vs Republicans.

Shocker.



One big tell of your most egregious instances of mendacity on this board is when you reply to a post without quoting it (or quoting it only in part), like you did above. When I see that, I know a lie or dodge is embedded in your response. The above is exactly that.

I said nothing about democrats vs republicans. I simply pointed out that many, like you, seem to be rooting against Trump when that means rooting against our country. You could disabuse me of that notion by simply posting "I hope Trump's military action is successful and that there is regime change in Iran to a more pro-western government." Can you say that?

Beyond that, I was pointing out the hypocrisy of many on this board when it comes to gas prices. You, again, are exhibit A for that since you love to post random pictures of high gas prices and then blame trump even though CA gas prices have been absurdly high since forever. And when you know that the gas prices will return to normal as soon as the military action is over.

Regarding the substance of your post - because unlike you I will respond - Trump also ran on the platform that Iran would not obtain a nuclear bomb under his watch. Just like all of the presidents since Reagan. Trump's America First platform is consistent with that - if you believe Iran having a bomb (or for that matter ballistic missiles) is against America's vital interest. Clearly Trump believes that, since his platform has always said as such.

My guess is that 80-90% of Americans don't want Iran to have nukes with missiles that reach Europe and the USA. If you and dem politicians choose to be on the other side of that issue, god bless you. So I'll ask directly - do you feel that Iran having a nuclear bomb and/or ballistic missiles that can reach Europe or the USA is an acceptable risk for the USA?

Some of Trump's supporters are upset with the Iran military action. They are in the minority. Recent polls suggest that 80%+ of republicans support Trump's Iran actions. That will change if: (i) there are mass American casualties; (ii) the hostilities drag on for more than a few months; and/or (iii) there are ground troops inserted for anything more than special forces missions.


tldr.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearGoggles said:

DiabloWags said:

What I find truly remarkable about your post is how easily you are able to succumb to turning this into a nice, neat, little box of partisan politics and Democrats vs Republicans, even using the TDS card.

For some puzzling reason, you conveniently ignore the FACT that Trump ran his election campaign primarily on an American First! doctrine and being the peace president with No New Wars.

I would imagine that there are a large number of those 77 million voters that voted for Trump in 2024 and believed his campaign promises . . . particularly America First! and No New Wars.

I would also imagine that many of them feel betrayed now.
But instead of mentioning this, you do nothing more than default to Dems vs Republicans.

Shocker.



One big tell of your most egregious instances of mendacity on this board is when you reply to a post without quoting it (or quoting it only in part), like you did above. When I see that, I know a lie or dodge is embedded in your response. The above is exactly that.

I said nothing about democrats vs republicans. I simply pointed out that many, like you, seem to be rooting against Trump when that means rooting against our country. You could disabuse me of that notion by simply posting "I hope Trump's military action is successful and that there is regime change in Iran to a more pro-western government." Can you say that?

Beyond that, I was pointing out the hypocrisy of many on this board when it comes to gas prices. You, again, are exhibit A for that since you love to post random pictures of high gas prices and then blame trump even though CA gas prices have been absurdly high since forever. And when you know that the gas prices will return to normal as soon as the military action is over.

Regarding the substance of your post - because unlike you I will respond - Trump also ran on the platform that Iran would not obtain a nuclear bomb under his watch. Just like all of the presidents since Reagan. Trump's America First platform is consistent with that - if you believe Iran having a bomb (or for that matter ballistic missiles) is against America's vital interest. Clearly Trump believes that, since his platform has always said as such.

My guess is that 80-90% of Americans don't want Iran to have nukes with missiles that reach Europe and the USA. If you and dem politicians choose to be on the other side of that issue, god bless you. So I'll ask directly - do you feel that Iran having a nuclear bomb and/or ballistic missiles that can reach Europe or the USA is an acceptable risk for the USA?

Some of Trump's supporters are upset with the Iran military action. They are in the minority. Recent polls suggest that 80%+ of republicans support Trump's Iran actions. That will change if: (i) there are mass American casualties; (ii) the hostilities drag on for more than a few months; and/or (iii) there are ground troops inserted for anything more than special forces missions.


tldr.



And you wonder why people on the right don't take you seriously here. He actually responded to your post and you say that. Or you read it and you don't have a snappy comeback so you play dumb
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearGoggles said:

DiabloWags said:

What I find truly remarkable about your post is how easily you are able to succumb to turning this into a nice, neat, little box of partisan politics and Democrats vs Republicans, even using the TDS card.

For some puzzling reason, you conveniently ignore the FACT that Trump ran his election campaign primarily on an American First! doctrine and being the peace president with No New Wars.

I would imagine that there are a large number of those 77 million voters that voted for Trump in 2024 and believed his campaign promises . . . particularly America First! and No New Wars.

I would also imagine that many of them feel betrayed now.
But instead of mentioning this, you do nothing more than default to Dems vs Republicans.

Shocker.



One big tell of your most egregious instances of mendacity on this board is when you reply to a post without quoting it (or quoting it only in part), like you did above. When I see that, I know a lie or dodge is embedded in your response. The above is exactly that.

I said nothing about democrats vs republicans. I simply pointed out that many, like you, seem to be rooting against Trump when that means rooting against our country. You could disabuse me of that notion by simply posting "I hope Trump's military action is successful and that there is regime change in Iran to a more pro-western government." Can you say that?

Beyond that, I was pointing out the hypocrisy of many on this board when it comes to gas prices. You, again, are exhibit A for that since you love to post random pictures of high gas prices and then blame trump even though CA gas prices have been absurdly high since forever. And when you know that the gas prices will return to normal as soon as the military action is over.

Regarding the substance of your post - because unlike you I will respond - Trump also ran on the platform that Iran would not obtain a nuclear bomb under his watch. Just like all of the presidents since Reagan. Trump's America First platform is consistent with that - if you believe Iran having a bomb (or for that matter ballistic missiles) is against America's vital interest. Clearly Trump believes that, since his platform has always said as such.

My guess is that 80-90% of Americans don't want Iran to have nukes with missiles that reach Europe and the USA. If you and dem politicians choose to be on the other side of that issue, god bless you. So I'll ask directly - do you feel that Iran having a nuclear bomb and/or ballistic missiles that can reach Europe or the USA is an acceptable risk for the USA?

Some of Trump's supporters are upset with the Iran military action. They are in the minority. Recent polls suggest that 80%+ of republicans support Trump's Iran actions. That will change if: (i) there are mass American casualties; (ii) the hostilities drag on for more than a few months; and/or (iii) there are ground troops inserted for anything more than special forces missions.


tldr.



And you wonder why people on the right don't take you seriously here


I dont have time to read a 3,000 word "essay" by someone who defended Teri McKeever.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearGoggles said:

DiabloWags said:

What I find truly remarkable about your post is how easily you are able to succumb to turning this into a nice, neat, little box of partisan politics and Democrats vs Republicans, even using the TDS card.

For some puzzling reason, you conveniently ignore the FACT that Trump ran his election campaign primarily on an American First! doctrine and being the peace president with No New Wars.

I would imagine that there are a large number of those 77 million voters that voted for Trump in 2024 and believed his campaign promises . . . particularly America First! and No New Wars.

I would also imagine that many of them feel betrayed now.
But instead of mentioning this, you do nothing more than default to Dems vs Republicans.

Shocker.



One big tell of your most egregious instances of mendacity on this board is when you reply to a post without quoting it (or quoting it only in part), like you did above. When I see that, I know a lie or dodge is embedded in your response. The above is exactly that.

I said nothing about democrats vs republicans. I simply pointed out that many, like you, seem to be rooting against Trump when that means rooting against our country. You could disabuse me of that notion by simply posting "I hope Trump's military action is successful and that there is regime change in Iran to a more pro-western government." Can you say that?

Beyond that, I was pointing out the hypocrisy of many on this board when it comes to gas prices. You, again, are exhibit A for that since you love to post random pictures of high gas prices and then blame trump even though CA gas prices have been absurdly high since forever. And when you know that the gas prices will return to normal as soon as the military action is over.

Regarding the substance of your post - because unlike you I will respond - Trump also ran on the platform that Iran would not obtain a nuclear bomb under his watch. Just like all of the presidents since Reagan. Trump's America First platform is consistent with that - if you believe Iran having a bomb (or for that matter ballistic missiles) is against America's vital interest. Clearly Trump believes that, since his platform has always said as such.

My guess is that 80-90% of Americans don't want Iran to have nukes with missiles that reach Europe and the USA. If you and dem politicians choose to be on the other side of that issue, god bless you. So I'll ask directly - do you feel that Iran having a nuclear bomb and/or ballistic missiles that can reach Europe or the USA is an acceptable risk for the USA?

Some of Trump's supporters are upset with the Iran military action. They are in the minority. Recent polls suggest that 80%+ of republicans support Trump's Iran actions. That will change if: (i) there are mass American casualties; (ii) the hostilities drag on for more than a few months; and/or (iii) there are ground troops inserted for anything more than special forces missions.


tldr.



And you wonder why people on the right don't take you seriously here


I dont have time to read a 3,000 word "essay" by someone who defended Teri McKeever.



You've made it clear you don't have time to read at all. Or prove your claims.
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearGoggles said:

DiabloWags said:

What I find truly remarkable about your post is how easily you are able to succumb to turning this into a nice, neat, little box of partisan politics and Democrats vs Republicans, even using the TDS card.

For some puzzling reason, you conveniently ignore the FACT that Trump ran his election campaign primarily on an American First! doctrine and being the peace president with No New Wars.

I would imagine that there are a large number of those 77 million voters that voted for Trump in 2024 and believed his campaign promises . . . particularly America First! and No New Wars.

I would also imagine that many of them feel betrayed now.
But instead of mentioning this, you do nothing more than default to Dems vs Republicans.

Shocker.



One big tell of your most egregious instances of mendacity on this board is when you reply to a post without quoting it (or quoting it only in part), like you did above. When I see that, I know a lie or dodge is embedded in your response. The above is exactly that.

I said nothing about democrats vs republicans. I simply pointed out that many, like you, seem to be rooting against Trump when that means rooting against our country. You could disabuse me of that notion by simply posting "I hope Trump's military action is successful and that there is regime change in Iran to a more pro-western government." Can you say that?

Beyond that, I was pointing out the hypocrisy of many on this board when it comes to gas prices. You, again, are exhibit A for that since you love to post random pictures of high gas prices and then blame trump even though CA gas prices have been absurdly high since forever. And when you know that the gas prices will return to normal as soon as the military action is over.

Regarding the substance of your post - because unlike you I will respond - Trump also ran on the platform that Iran would not obtain a nuclear bomb under his watch. Just like all of the presidents since Reagan. Trump's America First platform is consistent with that - if you believe Iran having a bomb (or for that matter ballistic missiles) is against America's vital interest. Clearly Trump believes that, since his platform has always said as such.

My guess is that 80-90% of Americans don't want Iran to have nukes with missiles that reach Europe and the USA. If you and dem politicians choose to be on the other side of that issue, god bless you. So I'll ask directly - do you feel that Iran having a nuclear bomb and/or ballistic missiles that can reach Europe or the USA is an acceptable risk for the USA?

Some of Trump's supporters are upset with the Iran military action. They are in the minority. Recent polls suggest that 80%+ of republicans support Trump's Iran actions. That will change if: (i) there are mass American casualties; (ii) the hostilities drag on for more than a few months; and/or (iii) there are ground troops inserted for anything more than special forces missions.


tldr.



And you wonder why people on the right don't take you seriously here. He actually responded to your post and you say that. Or you read it and you don't have a snappy comeback so you play dumb

It's not playing if it's true.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearGoggles said:

DiabloWags said:

What I find truly remarkable about your post is how easily you are able to succumb to turning this into a nice, neat, little box of partisan politics and Democrats vs Republicans, even using the TDS card.

For some puzzling reason, you conveniently ignore the FACT that Trump ran his election campaign primarily on an American First! doctrine and being the peace president with No New Wars.

I would imagine that there are a large number of those 77 million voters that voted for Trump in 2024 and believed his campaign promises . . . particularly America First! and No New Wars.

I would also imagine that many of them feel betrayed now.
But instead of mentioning this, you do nothing more than default to Dems vs Republicans.

Shocker.



One big tell of your most egregious instances of mendacity on this board is when you reply to a post without quoting it (or quoting it only in part), like you did above. When I see that, I know a lie or dodge is embedded in your response. The above is exactly that.

I said nothing about democrats vs republicans. I simply pointed out that many, like you, seem to be rooting against Trump when that means rooting against our country. You could disabuse me of that notion by simply posting "I hope Trump's military action is successful and that there is regime change in Iran to a more pro-western government." Can you say that?

Beyond that, I was pointing out the hypocrisy of many on this board when it comes to gas prices. You, again, are exhibit A for that since you love to post random pictures of high gas prices and then blame trump even though CA gas prices have been absurdly high since forever. And when you know that the gas prices will return to normal as soon as the military action is over.

Regarding the substance of your post - because unlike you I will respond - Trump also ran on the platform that Iran would not obtain a nuclear bomb under his watch. Just like all of the presidents since Reagan. Trump's America First platform is consistent with that - if you believe Iran having a bomb (or for that matter ballistic missiles) is against America's vital interest. Clearly Trump believes that, since his platform has always said as such.

My guess is that 80-90% of Americans don't want Iran to have nukes with missiles that reach Europe and the USA. If you and dem politicians choose to be on the other side of that issue, god bless you. So I'll ask directly - do you feel that Iran having a nuclear bomb and/or ballistic missiles that can reach Europe or the USA is an acceptable risk for the USA?

Some of Trump's supporters are upset with the Iran military action. They are in the minority. Recent polls suggest that 80%+ of republicans support Trump's Iran actions. That will change if: (i) there are mass American casualties; (ii) the hostilities drag on for more than a few months; and/or (iii) there are ground troops inserted for anything more than special forces missions.


tldr.



And you wonder why people on the right don't take you seriously here


I dont have time to read a 3,000 word "essay" by someone who defended Teri McKeever.



Breaking news: the self-anointed math wizard lies again.
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Be good to your enemy
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:



Please just post with honesty. It can't be that difficult.


Please just put me on ignore. It can't be that difficult.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

oski003 said:



Please just post with honesty. It can't be that difficult.


Please just put me on ignore. It can't be that difficult.



No thank you.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.