Iran. Oh, the irony...

33,140 Views | 931 Replies | Last: 24 min ago by BearlySane88
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Then call me out for it when I do.

You're clearly deflecting right now after multiple videos you've posted are blatantly false IRGC propaganda
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Then call me out for it when I do.

You're clearly deflecting right now after multiple videos you've posted are blatantly false IRGC propaganda



It's not "false propaganda", it's a real video of a very large pro-government protest in Iran from 2020.

There are similar-sized pro-government protests in videos from today, March 1st, which I have also posted.

100% bad faith
0% ignorance
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Then call me out for it when I do.

You're clearly deflecting right now after multiple videos you've posted are blatantly false IRGC propaganda



It's not "false propaganda", it's a real video of a very large pro-government protest in Iran from 2020.

There are similar-sized pro-government protests in videos from today, March 1st, which I have also posted.

100% bad faith
0% ignorance


It's a very real video that you attributed to an entirely wrong event.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

Maybe Trump will start seizing oil tankers from Iran.


Which family member's portfolio will that go into?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Then call me out for it when I do.

You're clearly deflecting right now after multiple videos you've posted are blatantly false IRGC propaganda



It's not "false propaganda", it's a real video of a very large pro-government protest in Iran from 2020.

There are similar-sized pro-government protests in videos from today, March 1st, which I have also posted.

100% bad faith
0% ignorance


It's a very real video that you attributed to an entirely wrong event.


Exactly the same type of event actually, the mourning of an Iranian government figure killed by the US. In 2020 it was Soleimani, in 2026, Khamenei.

100% bad faith
0% ignorance
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Then call me out for it when I do.

You're clearly deflecting right now after multiple videos you've posted are blatantly false IRGC propaganda



It's not "false propaganda", it's a real video of a very large pro-government protest in Iran from 2020.

There are similar-sized pro-government protests in videos from today, March 1st, which I have also posted.

100% bad faith
0% ignorance


It's a very real video that you attributed to an entirely wrong event.


Exactly the same type of event actually, the mourning of an Iranian government figure killed by the US. In 2020 it was Soleimani, in 2026, Khamenei.

100% bad faith
0% ignorance



You can keep trying to cover your own ass but it was wrong, I called you on it, move on bro. Mistakes happen
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As we all know, 47 flip flops whenever he has something to gain by doing so.

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

concordtom said:

Maybe Trump will start seizing oil tankers from Iran.


Which family member's portfolio will that go into?




BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?


And people wonder why we don't trust the mainstream media anymore
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:



And people wonder why we don't trust the mainstream media anymore


No, we trust neocon luminaries like Michael Knowles from the Daily Wire instead.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:




At 100 schoolboys and girls killed yesterday, I would have thought the weekend quota was already fulfilled. Are we trying to get to Gaza levels by bombing dense city neighborhoods?

Hearts and minds...
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't trust him, he quoted an article. Look I get it, you got proved wrong this morning but now you're on this agenda to attack. It'll be okay buddy, just move on
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?


It was also Iran's own missile that hit the school
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

I don't trust him, he quoted an article. Look I get it, you got proved wrong this morning but now you're on this agenda to attack. It'll be okay buddy, just move on


You've posted 22 times today on this thread alone, don't be surprised if people disagree with your cookie cutter neocon takes.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And you've posted 16 times in this thread. What's your point?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

And you've posted 16 times in this thread. What's your point?


That I'm 38% less of a spammer than you?

You're right, it's a very bad look for me.

You have a strong tendency to engage in inane debates and use small-minded tactics like for example here always trying to have the last word, or to keep repeating the same point as if it wasn't wrong the first time around, and that repeating it ad nauseum is going to make it right, like claiming that the bomb that hit the school was a wayward Iranian missile.

Even a hardcore neocon source, which I have quoted earlier, recognized that it was a US/Israeli bombing, pivoting from "it was an iranian missile" to "it was a targeting mistake", get on with the program.


BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've told you to move on bro multiple times and you instead told me to tattoo it on my forehead and then typed it out backwards, but I'm the one that has to have the last word



They also aren't saying it wasn't Iran.

" Given the school's position, next to and possibly integrated into a military facility, the more logical explanation is that the school was mistakenly targeted during an attack on the base."

If this is in fact true, it feels like something Iran has done intentionally to put the school in a position of danger. No matter who was responsible, it's awful for the innocent students.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

They also aren't saying it wasn't Iran.


Pathetic, 100% bad faith.

I see that at least in your edit you have pivoted to stage 2 - "OK we did it, but that's because the school was in the wrong place", as if they gave a crap about collateral damage.



I kind of disagree with Cal alum McAdams here, Randy Fine's statement is 100% malice and 0% idiocy, he is willfully gaslighting the audience.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

Quote:

They also aren't saying it wasn't Iran.


Pathetic, 100% bad faith.




It says in the tweet from your own source that they aren't determining who is responsible. Exactly what I just said
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

Funny to watch the same bad actor argue with a new combatant here.

The point must be learned: it's pointless to get in the mud with a pig.


Agreed.

What's also funny is how 4 stars appear immediately with each and every post, no matter how false or absurd the post. I feel like I'm in grade school here in this forum.

Grown adults and Cal alums actually have time in their day for this?

Amazing.

tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
News is now reporting the Austin shooting yesterday may be a terrorist attack tied to the war. The shooter had a hoodie / jacket with the word Allah on it and had a shirt underneath with reference to Iran on it.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's a Sunday so yes.

Only seven of my last 40 posts have 4+ stars. 17.5%. Hardly what your post claims
wifeisafurd
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:



And people wonder why we don't trust the mainstream media anymore

People also may wonder why the Post has been a finical disaster since before it was owned by Bezos and has been losing circulation well before Bezos. Hence the most recent round of layoffs. If you want a left agenda, you read the NYT, and if you want the right agenda the WSJ. Or you can be like me and read both, and assumed any something of the truth likely lies somewhere in between. Every other major newspaper is going out of business, they just don't understand that yet.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

It's a Sunday so yes


Fact: This will be my 10th post for today.

Fact: I have better ways to spend my Sunday.

Take care.

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fact: I don't judge how you spend your weekends because I don't care what you do in your personal life. Why you care about what I do in mine is strange
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wifeisafurd said:

BearlySane88 said:



And people wonder why we don't trust the mainstream media anymore

People also may wonder why the Post has been a finical disaster since before it was owned by Bezos and has been losing circulation well before Bezos. Hence the most recent round of layoffs. If you want a left agenda, you read the NYT, and if you want the right agenda the WSJ. Or you can be like me and read both, and assumed any something of the truth likely lies somewhere in between. Every other major newspaper is going out of business, they just don't understand that yet.


Making money is not the business model for media outlets like the WaPo that belong to oligarchs.

You're going to see the same thing with CBS, CNN and the other media getting bought up by Larry Ellison. His main motivation in acquiring these outlets is to push the Israeli agenda.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't think you'd be wrong about that.

And this latest deal with Ellison has Trump's finger prints all over it. He and Larry have become quite cozy.

Amazing how quickly Netflix bowed out of the running.
Hmmmmmm....

After NINE BIDS, Ellison buys Warner for $81 BILLION.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/26/business/paramount-wbd-merger-david-ellison
brobear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
netflix got outbid and weren't willing to up their bid. that's why they dropped out
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
brobear said:

netflix got outbid and weren't willing to up their bid. that's why they dropped out


I didn't see it as being that simplistic.

Perhaps you weren't aware of this, but there were serious anti-trust issues involved with a Netflix acquisition of Warner. Anti-trust issues that Ellison's buddy Donald Trump expressed an "interest" in.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think the NYT and the WSJ put the facts through their bias filters but at least you are getting the facts.

It kind of surprises me how many anti Trump Administration articles are in the WSJ these days, but as I said, the WSJ gives you the facts, and those aren't real supportive of Trump Administration contentions.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
One thing is for certain. The bigger the stakes in the news, the dumber this board gets.
Censorship has always been a tool of the fascist
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

concordtom said:

Funny to watch the same bad actor argue with a new combatant here.

The point must be learned: it's pointless to get in the mud with a pig.


Agreed.

What's also funny is how 4 stars appear immediately with each and every post, no matter how false or absurd the post. I feel like I'm in grade school here in this forum.

Grown adults and Cal alums actually have time in their day for this?

Amazing.


I was thinking today that 2/3 of these "discussions" end up with Barley try to both explain what she said or what she didn't say. And it goes on and on in a back and forth. Give her props for being the Queen of Inuendo. Where every action, every post and word implies some belief etc but when questioned by normal people on said belief you get the ole "I didn't say that….blah blah" and then the whole thing starts up again and it's time to snooze the topic until someone gets tired and goes to bed
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

And people wonder why we don't trust the mainstream media anymore


The New York Times, too. Scott Adams received a harsher sub headline from the NYT for his obituary when he passed.
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First US casualties- 3 dead

Iran's new leadership will talk with Trump

I wouldn't be totally surprised if we see another "obliterated " post by Trump and he also takes the foot off the pedal
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.