Iran. Oh, the irony...

108,850 Views | 1984 Replies | Last: 14 min ago by MinotStateBeav
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Aunburdened said:

BearlySane88 said:



Guess they're not as excited about us bombing them as all of your propaganda sources would suggest.


Uh what? They were blocking the IRGC from getting to the American


Lowbrow wartime propaganda, it takes a very gullible public to buy that. Unfortunately a large segment of the public is pretty gullible.


We see the gullibility here all the time.
Like when a poster posts a tweet from Alexander Muse showing ship traffic returning to "normal" in the Strait.

And these people graduated from Cal?
Really?





In all fairness,

we see the gullibility here all the time.
Like when a poster posts complaining that eggs are $10 when they could still get a dozen at Trader Joe's for $4.49.

Or complains posting that gas in Los Angeles is > $8 per gallon when it was still $5.

Or complains about a bag of chips for $4 when they could get it for $2 elsewhere.

And these people graduated from Cal?
Really?


Peak gullibility is thinking that gas and food prices haven't been going up.


Nobody said that


100% bad faith.

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/132518/replies/2678805


100% bad reading comprehension

Nobody said prices aren't going up. He said they aren't going up to the levels Wags always posts about. It's clear Wags finds the most expensive prices to post about when there are cheaper options


There is always going to be a spread in the price of items across different outlets. There are always "cheaper options", but prices have been going up across the board, even at the cheaper places. That's why his argument is a poor one.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Aunburdened said:

BearlySane88 said:



Guess they're not as excited about us bombing them as all of your propaganda sources would suggest.


Uh what? They were blocking the IRGC from getting to the American


Lowbrow wartime propaganda, it takes a very gullible public to buy that. Unfortunately a large segment of the public is pretty gullible.


We see the gullibility here all the time.
Like when a poster posts a tweet from Alexander Muse showing ship traffic returning to "normal" in the Strait.

And these people graduated from Cal?
Really?





In all fairness,

we see the gullibility here all the time.
Like when a poster posts complaining that eggs are $10 when they could still get a dozen at Trader Joe's for $4.49.

Or complains posting that gas in Los Angeles is > $8 per gallon when it was still $5.

Or complains about a bag of chips for $4 when they could get it for $2 elsewhere.

And these people graduated from Cal?
Really?


Peak gullibility is thinking that gas and food prices haven't been going up.


Nobody said that


100% bad faith.

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/132518/replies/2678805


100% bad reading comprehension

Nobody said prices aren't going up. He said they aren't going up to the levels Wags always posts about. It's clear Wags finds the most expensive prices to post about when there are cheaper options


There is always going to be a spread in the price of items across different outlets. There are always "cheaper options", but prices have been going up across the board, even at the cheaper places. That's why his argument is a poor one.


The arguments that we see by the same old posters is the same old tired pattern of:

A.) Not providing any facts to their initial claim.
B.) Deflecting from the actual topic by casting the "messenger" (me) as the villain.
C.) Being so naive as to believe that the U.S. has "plenty of oil" and thus prices would never go > $4.00
D.) Having a terrible knowledge base when it comes to basic Econ 101a.
E.) Invariably, they reply back 3 more times to "clarify" what they said.
F.) All of the Above.

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Aunburdened said:

BearlySane88 said:



Guess they're not as excited about us bombing them as all of your propaganda sources would suggest.


Uh what? They were blocking the IRGC from getting to the American


Lowbrow wartime propaganda, it takes a very gullible public to buy that. Unfortunately a large segment of the public is pretty gullible.


Please refute it with facts instead of just calling people names. Otherwise it's just you defending another regime like usual


It is your claim, or that of Israeli propagandist Shrader, that is extraordinary and not credible, the notion that Iranians are protecting a pilot who is bombing them to the stone age.

Once again, your post is a combination of bad faith and ignorance, I'd say 80-20 here.


100% no facts provided

Once again, refute it with facts instead of insults otherwise your claim means nothing.


You didn't provide "facts", just a shot of a traffic jam in Iran, there is no indication that there was any motive there, no proof whatsoever that these drivers were blocking the IRGC, this is a narrative that smacks of complete BS.

it's a prime example of lowbrow wartime propaganda which shills like Emily Shraeder have been dispensing for years now.


And if you can disprove it, please do. I'll be waiting
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And you post incessantly about posters you claim to ignore. If you really ignored them, you wouldn't have to continually post about them. Just move on and get over yourself
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Aunburdened said:

BearlySane88 said:



Guess they're not as excited about us bombing them as all of your propaganda sources would suggest.


Uh what? They were blocking the IRGC from getting to the American


Lowbrow wartime propaganda, it takes a very gullible public to buy that. Unfortunately a large segment of the public is pretty gullible.


We see the gullibility here all the time.
Like when a poster posts a tweet from Alexander Muse showing ship traffic returning to "normal" in the Strait.

And these people graduated from Cal?
Really?





In all fairness,

we see the gullibility here all the time.
Like when a poster posts complaining that eggs are $10 when they could still get a dozen at Trader Joe's for $4.49.

Or complains posting that gas in Los Angeles is > $8 per gallon when it was still $5.

Or complains about a bag of chips for $4 when they could get it for $2 elsewhere.

And these people graduated from Cal?
Really?


Peak gullibility is thinking that gas and food prices haven't been going up.


Nobody said that


100% bad faith.

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/132518/replies/2678805


100% bad reading comprehension

Nobody said prices aren't going up. He said they aren't going up to the levels Wags always posts about. It's clear Wags finds the most expensive prices to post about when there are cheaper options


There is always going to be a spread in the price of items across different outlets. There are always "cheaper options", but prices have been going up across the board, even at the cheaper places. That's why his argument is a poor one.


You claimed he said prices weren't going up. You proved yourself wrong by linking his post and now you're pivoting.

100% bad faith
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Cal88 said:

oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Aunburdened said:

BearlySane88 said:



Guess they're not as excited about us bombing them as all of your propaganda sources would suggest.


Uh what? They were blocking the IRGC from getting to the American


Lowbrow wartime propaganda, it takes a very gullible public to buy that. Unfortunately a large segment of the public is pretty gullible.


We see the gullibility here all the time.
Like when a poster posts a tweet from Alexander Muse showing ship traffic returning to "normal" in the Strait.

And these people graduated from Cal?
Really?





In all fairness,

we see the gullibility here all the time.
Like when a poster posts complaining that eggs are $10 when they could still get a dozen at Trader Joe's for $4.49.

Or complains posting that gas in Los Angeles is > $8 per gallon when it was still $5.

Or complains about a bag of chips for $4 when they could get it for $2 elsewhere.

And these people graduated from Cal?
Really?


Peak gullibility is thinking that gas and food prices haven't been going up.


Bingo.

Or claiming that gas prices won't get above $4.00 a gallon because the U.S. has "plenty of oil".
Doing nothing but parrot the Mango Moron.

Apparently, these people didn't know that oil is a global commodity.
Who knew?

And these people graduated from Cal?
Really?





Please feel free to point out those who said gas woudn't go above $4. Right now, all I see is someone who lied repeatedly about gas and food prices and is further lying saying folks said gas prices would never go above $4.

And these lying people graduated from Cal?
Really?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

Cal88 said:

oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Aunburdened said:

BearlySane88 said:



Guess they're not as excited about us bombing them as all of your propaganda sources would suggest.


Uh what? They were blocking the IRGC from getting to the American


Lowbrow wartime propaganda, it takes a very gullible public to buy that. Unfortunately a large segment of the public is pretty gullible.


We see the gullibility here all the time.
Like when a poster posts a tweet from Alexander Muse showing ship traffic returning to "normal" in the Strait.

And these people graduated from Cal?
Really?





In all fairness,

we see the gullibility here all the time.
Like when a poster posts complaining that eggs are $10 when they could still get a dozen at Trader Joe's for $4.49.

Or complains posting that gas in Los Angeles is > $8 per gallon when it was still $5.

Or complains about a bag of chips for $4 when they could get it for $2 elsewhere.

And these people graduated from Cal?
Really?


Peak gullibility is thinking that gas and food prices haven't been going up.


Bingo.

Or claiming that gas prices won't get above $4.00 a gallon because the U.S. has "plenty of oil".
Doing nothing but parrot the Mango Moron.

Apparently, these people didn't know that oil is a global commodity.
Who knew?

And these people graduated from Cal?
Really?





Please feel free to point out those who said gas woudn't go above $4. Right now, all I see is someone who lied repeatedly about gas and food prices and is further lying saying folks said gas prices would never go above $4.

And these lying people graduated from Cal?
Really?



Don't ask Wags to think critically or self reflect. He's proven incapable of both
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Aunburdened said:

BearlySane88 said:



Guess they're not as excited about us bombing them as all of your propaganda sources would suggest.


Uh what? They were blocking the IRGC from getting to the American


Lowbrow wartime propaganda, it takes a very gullible public to buy that. Unfortunately a large segment of the public is pretty gullible.

Or they pretend to be
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:


The arguments that we see by the same old posters is the same old tired pattern of:

Talking about people instead of ideas.

Just shut up. Really. Nobody likes you.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

DiabloWags said:


The arguments that we see by the same old posters is the same old tired pattern of:

Talking about people instead of ideas.

Just shut up. Really. Nobody likes you.


Why would I care about anything that you say?

You repeatedly call tons of posters here dumb, stupid, and even a moderator a moron.
You did this all in a 30-minute period back on Feb. 28th
And yet you were only suspended for a week.

You don't come across as a very HAPPY person.
You appear ANGRY all the time.

Have a nice day!



.


Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Aunburdened said:

BearlySane88 said:



Guess they're not as excited about us bombing them as all of your propaganda sources would suggest.


Uh what? They were blocking the IRGC from getting to the American


Lowbrow wartime propaganda, it takes a very gullible public to buy that. Unfortunately a large segment of the public is pretty gullible.

Or they pretend to be


Yes sometimes it's hard to make up how much of that is ignorance, and how much is bad faith.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

DiabloWags said:


The arguments that we see by the same old posters is the same old tired pattern of:

Talking about people instead of ideas.

Just shut up. Really. Nobody likes you.


BINGO!
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

DiabloWags said:


The arguments that we see by the same old posters is the same old tired pattern of:

Talking about people instead of ideas.

Just shut up. Really. Nobody likes you.


Feel free to put me on IGNORE.
But you can't.

Gee, I wonder why.

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Aunburdened said:

DiabloWags said:


The arguments that we see by the same old posters is the same old tired pattern of:

Talking about people instead of ideas.

Just shut up. Really. Nobody likes you.


Feel free to put me on IGNORE.
But you can't.

Gee, I wonder why.




Because it's way more fun to watch you make a fool of yourself with your posts
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just remember folks . . .

"Gas prices will never go over $4.00 a gallon cause the U.S. has plenty of oil"

LMFAO

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who said this? You keep making the claim someone said this but I don't remember ever reading it here
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

DiabloWags said:


The arguments that we see by the same old posters is the same old tired pattern of:

Talking about people instead of ideas.

Just shut up. Really. Nobody likes you.


Your most liked post ever, congrats!
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Just remember folks . . .
"Gas prices will never go over $4.00 a gallon cause the U.S. has plenty of oil"

this old fool is majorly biased against dumping mega-tons of CO2 in the air, due to it's catastrophic contribution to slow-motion global warming. shame hardly anyone important gives a fark, but that ship has sunk sailed.
so whenever the price goes up, hell yeah, pray to Oski it doubles, maany times, despite consumer inconvenience.
# schadenfreude
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
smh said:

DiabloWags said:

Just remember folks . . .
"Gas prices will never go over $4.00 a gallon cause the U.S. has plenty of oil"

this old fool is majorly biased against dumping mega-tons of CO2 in the air, due to it's catastrophic contribution to slow-motion global warming. shame hardly anyone important gives a fark, but that ship has sunk sailed.
so whenever the price goes up, hell yeah, pray to Oski it doubles, maany times, despite consumer inconvenience.
# schadenfreude


Hundreds of millions of people around the planet are going to starve because of this war and the fallout from the shock in oil and gas supply and that of fertilizers. Many, many more than your imaginary future deaths from CO2, which is actually a very powerful plant fertilizer and has contributed to ever greater agricultural yields across the world and the greening of deserts in African and Asia.

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

smh said:

DiabloWags said:

Just remember folks . . .
"Gas prices will never go over $4.00 a gallon cause the U.S. has plenty of oil"

this old fool is majorly biased against dumping mega-tons of CO2 in the air, due to it's catastrophic contribution to slow-motion global warming. shame hardly anyone important gives a fark, but that ship has sunk sailed.
so whenever the price goes up, hell yeah, pray to Oski it doubles, maany times, despite consumer inconvenience.
# schadenfreude


Hundreds of millions of people around the planet are going to starve because of this war and the fallout from the shock in oil and gas supply and that of fertilizers. Many, many more than your imaginary future deaths from CO2, which is actually a very powerful plant fertilizer and has contributed to ever greater agricultural yields across the world and the greening of deserts in African and Asia.




Starve, no. Acute hunger, possibly.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
High quality trolling from Iran:

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Who said this? You keep making the claim someone said this but I don't remember ever reading it here


You did.
Exactly one month ago today.

Operation Epic Furry Energy Crisis Thread | Bear Insider
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

Who said this? You keep making the claim someone said this but I don't remember ever reading it here


You did.
Exactly one month ago today.

Operation Epic Furry Energy Crisis Thread | Bear Insider



We've already been over this in the other thread but keep on being the cool guy you are
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

Who said this? You keep making the claim someone said this but I don't remember ever reading it here


You did.
Exactly one month ago today.

Operation Epic Furry Energy Crisis Thread | Bear Insider



We've already been over this in the other thread but keep on being the cool guy you are


There is no other "clarification" necessary.
I guess that when someone posts 60 - 70 times in one day, they might not remember what they posted.

I simply pointed out that it was YOU who posted this exactly one month ago today.
No one else.

Thanks.



BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

Who said this? You keep making the claim someone said this but I don't remember ever reading it here


You did.
Exactly one month ago today.

Operation Epic Furry Energy Crisis Thread | Bear Insider



We've already been over this in the other thread but keep on being the cool guy you are


There is no other "clarification" necessary.
I guess that when someone posts 60 - 70 times in one day, they might not remember what they posted.

I simply pointed out that it was YOU who posted this exactly one month ago today.
No one else.

Thanks.






You already pointed this out in the other thread big guy and we've had our discussion about it there. I'm moving on, I've said my piece.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:


You already pointed this out in the other thread big guy and we've had our discussion about it there. I'm moving on, I've said my piece.


Yes.

Im glad I could help refresh your memory.
You're welcome!
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

Who said this? You keep making the claim someone said this but I don't remember ever reading it here


You did.
Exactly one month ago today.

Operation Epic Furry Energy Crisis Thread | Bear Insider



We've already been over this in the other thread but keep on being the cool guy you are


There is no other "clarification" necessary.
I guess that when someone posts 60 - 70 times in one day, they might not remember what they posted.

I simply pointed out that it was YOU who posted this exactly one month ago today.
No one else.

Thanks.






You already pointed this out in the other thread big guy and we've had our discussion about it there. I'm moving on, I've said my piece.


Censorship has always been a tool of the fascist
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

Who said this? You keep making the claim someone said this but I don't remember ever reading it here


You did.
Exactly one month ago today.

Operation Epic Furry Energy Crisis Thread | Bear Insider



We've already been over this in the other thread but keep on being the cool guy you are


There is no other "clarification" necessary.
I guess that when someone posts 60 - 70 times in one day, they might not remember what they posted.

I simply pointed out that it was YOU who posted this exactly one month ago today.
No one else.

Thanks.






You already pointed this out in the other thread big guy and we've had our discussion about it there. I'm moving on, I've said my piece.





Lmao just not gonna have the same convo in two threads. Someone like you might get angry about spamming the board
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That would be your buddy.
Yogi.

Not me.
I dont spam the board asking "who posted that?"

Again, Im glad I could help you refresh your memory.
I guess you forget what you post sometimes.

Do better.
Thanks.

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

That would be your buddy.
Yogi.

Not me.
I dont spam the board asking "who posted that?"

Again, Im glad I could help you refresh your memory.
I guess you forget what you post sometimes.

Do better.
Thanks.




Please lord put me back on ignore. I did not miss your incessant repetition
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Iran demands or else?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.